Letters
Author
Publication Information
Hilgardia 58(2):79-79. DOI:10.3733/ca.v058n02p79. April 2004.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
. 2004. Letters. Hilgardia 58(2):79-79. DOI:10.3733/ca.v058n02p79
Also in this issue:
Life history of the incense cedar scale, Xylococculus macrocarpae (Homoptera: Margarodidae), on incense cedar in California with a description of the larvae of one of its common predators, Eronyxa expansus Van Dyke (Coleoptera: Trogositidae)Challenges and opportunities for horticultural biotechnology
Transgenic acreage grows amid changing regulation
Conventionally bred papaya still possible, even in California
UC researchers evaluating genetically engineered alfalfa
World trade rules affect horticultural biotechnology
Horticultural biotechnology faces significant economic and market barriers
Sidebar: Transgenic produce slow to enter evolving global marketplace
Sidebar: Diversity of horticultural biotech crops contributes to market hurdles
Despite benefits, commercialization of transgenic horticultural crops lags
Sidebar: Virus-resistant transgenic papaya helps save Hawaiian industry
Sidebar: Biotechnology expands pest-management options for horticulture
Sidebar: Transgenic trap crops and rootstocks show potential
Consumer knowledge and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology vary
Sidebar: Words matter
Sidebar: Consumers purchase Bt sweet corn
Regulatory challenges reduce opportunities for horticultural biotechnology
Sidebar: IR-4 Project targets specialty crops
Sidebar: China aggressively pursuing horticulture and plant biotechnology
Public-private partnerships needed in horticultural research and development
Access to intellectual property is a major obstacle to developing transgenic horticultural crops
Sidebar: Nonprofit institutions form intellectual-property resource for agriculture