Public-private partnerships needed in horticultural research and development
Authors
Holly AmedenGordon Rausser
Authors Affiliations
H. Ameden is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Berkeley. The UC Berkeley–Novartis agreement was designed and implemented while Professor Rausser was Dean of the College of Natural Resources at UC Berkeley; G. Rausser is Robert Gordon Sproul Distinguished Professor,.Publication Information
Hilgardia 58(2):116-119. DOI:10.3733/ca.v058n02p116. April 2004.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
University-industry partnerships are proliferating in the United States, as public funding for high-level research continues to decline yet knowledge plays an increasingly important role in industrial processes. The horticulture industry benefits from such arrangements by influencing research directions and gaining access to innovations and complementary research in agri-cultural biotechnology. Given the nature of this industry, the obstacles to developing effective partnerships are substantial. Private horticulture institutions should form consortia of both small- and medium-sized firms, and they should understand the need for faculty and academic freedom. More enterprising members of a consortium can capitalize on the research contacts and pursue firm-specific, applied-research partnerships. Potential drawbacks are the exclusion of smaller firms and inequitable benefits-sharing within the consortia.
Also in this issue:
Life history of the incense cedar scale, Xylococculus macrocarpae (Homoptera: Margarodidae), on incense cedar in California with a description of the larvae of one of its common predators, Eronyxa expansus Van Dyke (Coleoptera: Trogositidae)Challenges and opportunities for horticultural biotechnology
Transgenic acreage grows amid changing regulation
Conventionally bred papaya still possible, even in California
UC researchers evaluating genetically engineered alfalfa
World trade rules affect horticultural biotechnology
Letters
Horticultural biotechnology faces significant economic and market barriers
Sidebar: Transgenic produce slow to enter evolving global marketplace
Sidebar: Diversity of horticultural biotech crops contributes to market hurdles
Despite benefits, commercialization of transgenic horticultural crops lags
Sidebar: Virus-resistant transgenic papaya helps save Hawaiian industry
Sidebar: Biotechnology expands pest-management options for horticulture
Sidebar: Transgenic trap crops and rootstocks show potential
Consumer knowledge and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology vary
Sidebar: Words matter
Sidebar: Consumers purchase Bt sweet corn
Regulatory challenges reduce opportunities for horticultural biotechnology
Sidebar: IR-4 Project targets specialty crops
Sidebar: China aggressively pursuing horticulture and plant biotechnology
Access to intellectual property is a major obstacle to developing transgenic horticultural crops
Sidebar: Nonprofit institutions form intellectual-property resource for agriculture