University of California

Agro-environmental partnerships facilitate sustainable wine-grape production and assessment


Janet C. Broome
Keith Douglass Warner

Authors Affiliations

J.C. Broome is Academic Coordinator, UC Cooperative Extension, Sacramento, Yolo and Solano counties; K.D. Warner is Lecturer and Researcher, Environmental Studies Institute, Santa Clara University.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 62(4):133-141. DOI:10.3733/ca.v062n04p133. October 2008.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


The California wine-grape sector has invested considerable time, money and effort in collective enterprises to reach fellow growers and assess the industry as a whole on sustain-ability. At the same time, California wine-grape production has become increasingly branded by particular geographic regions. Premium wine grapes are grown in regions with high population growth, high land values and often, charged environmental politics. Growers and their institutions have developed several agro-environmental partnerships to assess, improve and publicly represent their environmental stewardship and farming practices. We review trends in several regional and statewide indicators of sustainability, including crush prices, grape acreage, population growth and pesticide use. This review is based on 2 years of field research with participants in wine-grape partnerships, a review of documentary evidence, technical advisory work with the programs and summary assessment of case study data, as well as an analysis of 10 years of Pesticide Use Report data for California wine-grape growers.


Allen P. Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. 1993. New York: Wiley. 344 p.

[CSWA] California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance. California Wine Community Sustainability Report 2004. 2004. San Francisco: CA. www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/2004sustainabilityreport.php.

CSWA. California Sustainable Winegrowing Program Progress Report. 2006. San Francisco: CA. http://www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/docs/cswa_2006_swp_progress_report.pdf.

[CCVT] Central Coast Vineyard Team. Positive Points System: A Self-Assessment Tool for Evaluating Sustainable Management Practices Used in Vineyards. 2007. CA.: Paso Robles. www.vineyardteam.org/PPS_2006_

Conaway J. The Far Side of Eden. 2002. Boston: Hough Miffl. 384 p.

Daane KM, Smith RJ, Klonsky KM, Bentley WJ. Organic vineyard management in California. 2005. www.organic-research.com (May):37N-55N.

Dlott J, Ohmart C, Garn J, et al. The Code of Sustainable Winegrowing Workbook. 2006. (2nd ed.) San Francisco, CA.: California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance. www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/index.php .

El Titi A. Integrated farming: An ecological farming approach in European agriculture. Outlook Ag. 1992. 21(1):33-9.

Friedland WH. Agriculture and rurality: Beginning the “final separation” ?. Rur Sociol. 2002. 67(3):350-71.

Goodhue R, Green R, Heien D, Martin P. California wine industry evolving to compete in the 21st century. Cal Ag. 2008. 62(1):12-8.

Lapsley JT. Bottled Poetry: Napa Winemaking from the Prohibition to the Modern Era. 1996. Berkeley, CA: UC Pr. 301 p.

[LWC] Lodi Winegrape Commission. Lodi Rules Farming Standards. 2007. CA.: Lodi. www.lodiwine.com/lodirules_home1.shtml .

Lybbert TJ, Gubler WD. California wine grape growers' use of powdery mildew forecasts. 2008. CA.: UC Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. Davis. www.agecon.ucdavis.edu/extension/update/articles/v11n4_4.pdf .

MKF Research. The Economic Impact of California Wine 2006 Update. 2006. St. Helena, CA.: Research report. 23 p.

[NRC] National Research Council. Alternative Agriculture. 1989. Washington, DC: Nat Acad Pr. 448 p.

Ohmart CP, Matthiasson S. Lodi Winegrower's Workbook: A Self Assessment of Integrated Farming Practices. 2000. Lodi, CA.: Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission. 145 p.

Poirier-Locke J. Vineyards in the Watershed: Sustainable Winegrowing in Napa County. 2002. Napa, CA.: Napa Sustainable Winegrowing Group. 182 p.

Swezey SL, Broome JC. Growth predicted in biologically integrated and organic farming. Cal Ag. 2000. 54(4):26-36.

[USDA NASS] US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. California Grape Acreage Bulletins. 2006a. www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/California/Publications/Fruits_and_Nuts/index_prev_gab.asp .

USDA NASS. California Grape Crush Bulletins. 2006b. www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/California/Publications/Grape_Crush/index_prev_gcb.asp.

Warner KD. Extending agroecology: Grower participation in partnerships is key to social learning. Renew Food Agr Syst. 2006. 21(2):84-94. doi:10.1079/RAF2005131 https://doi.org/doi:10.1079/RAF2005131

Warner KD. Agroecology in Action: Extending Alternative Agriculture Through Social Networks. 2007a. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pr. 273 p.

Warner KD. The quality of sustainability: Agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California winegrapes. J Rur Stud. 2007b. 23(2):142-55. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.009 https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.009

[WCED] World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. 1987. Oxford Univ Pr. 400 p.

Broome J, Warner K. 2008. Agro-environmental partnerships facilitate sustainable wine-grape production and assessment. Hilgardia 62(4):133-141. DOI:10.3733/ca.v062n04p133
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu