Soil properties change in no-till tomato production
Authors
Enrique V. HerreroW. Thomas Lanini
Eugene M. Miyao
Ronald D. Morse
Enio Campiglia
Jeffrey P. Mitchell
Steven R. Temple
Publication Information
Hilgardia 55(1):30-34. DOI:10.3733/ca.v055n01p30. January 2001.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
High production costs and perceived declines in soil quality due to agricultural intensification have led to recent interest in conservation tillage production practices. We conducted field experiments in Five Points in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the effectiveness of maintaining a cover crop mulch on the soil surface in a no-till system compared to a standard tillage system for conserving soil moisture and improving water infiltration and other soil physical properties in a furrow-irrigated tomato field. Soil water content did not differ among treatments in 1997, but was higher under no-till cover crop mulches than conventionally tilled plots during the 1998 growing season. Soil carbon was increased more than 8% and more earthworms were found under no-till mulches relative to the conventionally tilled plots in the second year of the study. Soil compaction was lower in no-till treatments, especially at the 1-to-2-foot depth. In this study, furrows were swept clean and therefore furrow irrigation did not constitute a limitation to this no-till system.
References
Abdul-Baki AA, JR Teasdale. A no-tillage tomato production system using hairy vetch and subterranean clover mulches. Hort Science. 1993. 28:106-8.
Gantzer CJ, GR Blake. Physical characteristics of Le Sueur clay loam soil following no-till and conventional tillage. Agron J. 1978. 70:853-57.
Griffith DR, Mannering JV., Box JE, Sprague MA, Triplett GB. Soil and water management with reduced tillage. No-Tillage and Surface Tillage Agriculture. 1986. New York: Wiley. p. 19-55.
Herrero EV, Mitchell JP, Campiglia E, et al. Use of cover crop mulches in furrow irrigated no-till processing tomato production system. Hort Technology. 2001. 11((1)):43-8.
Hoyt GD, Monks DW, TJ Monaco. Conservation tillage for vegetable production. Hort Technology. 1994. 4((2)):129-35.
Hsiao TC, Jackson MB, Black CR. Effects of drought and elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and productivity. Interacting Stresses on Plant in a Changing Climate. 1993. 16: Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p. 446-59. NATO ASI Series
Mitchell JP, Hartz T, Pettygrove S, et al. Organic matter recycling varies with crops grown. Cal Ag. 1999a. 53((4)):37-40.
Mitchell JP, Peters DW, Shennan C. Changes in soil water storage in winter fallowed and cover cropped soils. J. Sust Agr. 1999b. 15((2/3)):19-31.
Thomas GW, RE Phillips. Consequences of water movement in macropores. J Environ Qual. 1979. 8((2)):149-52.
Also in this issue:
Competitive interactions among endophagous parasitoids of potato tuberworm larvae in Southern CaliforniaSudden oak death spurs massive team effort
Letters
Science briefs
New pest management center based at UC Davis
Oak killer found in rhododendrons
New pests and diseases: Sudden oak death syndrome fells 3 oak species
Almond advertising yields net benefits to growers
Peach trees perform similarly despite different irrigation scheduling methods
Combining bensulide and pendimethalin controls weeds in onions
Table grapes suffer water loss, stem browning during cooling delays
First-grade gardeners more likely to taste vegetables