Buffering action of nonacid vegetables

Marsh, G

Buffering action of nonacid vegetables

Author

George L. Marsh

Author Affiliations

George L. Marsh was Associate in the Experiment Station, Division of Fruit Products.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 11(7):315-341. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v11n07p315. June 1938.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Abstract does not appear. First page follows.

Juices from all plant tissues exhibit more or less ability to resist changes in pH value on the addition of strong acids or bases⁽¹⁵⁾.3 The substances responsible for this buffering capacity have not been completely defined largely owing to the complexity of the systems involved. The complex nature of the extracted juices increases the difficulties of identifying the specific buffer substances. In those plant juices which have been investigated most extensively, the buffer capacity has been ascribed to organic acids⁽¹⁰⁾, dialyzable acid-salt systems⁽¹⁴⁾, proteins⁽⁶⁾, and acid phosphates⁽⁹⁾. Probably the buffering is also due to the adsorption reactions of the colloids as well as to dissociation of the weak acids or bases that may be present.

The buffering capacity of nonacid vegetables is of particular importance in connection with the use of acidified brines in canning. Cruess, Fong, and Liu⁽⁴⁾ found that nonacid vegetables canned with a sufficiently acid brine to bring their pH value below 4.5 may be readily pasteurized in boiling water and need not be processed in steam-heated pressure cookers. These investigators found, however, that the nonacid vegetables exerted a pronounced buffering action when canned in brines acidified with hydrochloric, citric, or acetic acids: a marked rise in pH value of the added brine occurred during heating. The increase was much greater than could be accounted for by diffusion, and they concluded that the rise in pH value was probably caused principally by the action of buffer substances dissolved from the vegetables. Bigelow and Cathcart⁽²⁾ had also noted that when beans were canned with tomato sauce there was an increase in pH value of the sauce which they stated to be “due to diffusion of acids into the beans.”

Aside from the work of the above investigators, no detailed study of the buffer capacity of nonacid vegetables is available.

Literature Cited

[1] Anonymous. Laboratory manual in general bacteriology. Univ. of California Syllabus Ser. 1926. 182:1-302.

[2] Bigelow W. D., Cathcart P. H. Relation of processing to the acidity of canned foods. National Canners’ Assoc. Bul. 1921. 17-L:1-46.

[3] Browne C. A. Report on sugars and sugar products. Jour. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 1937. 20:394-99.

[4] Cruess W. V., Fong W. Y., Liu T. C. The role of acidity in vegetable canning. Hilgardia. 1925. 1(13):275-93. (Out of print.) DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v01n13p275 [CrossRef]

[5] Cruess W. V., Richert P. H., Irish J. H. The effect of hydrogen-ion concentration on the toxicity of several preservatives to micro-organisms. Hilgardia. 1931. 6(10):295-314. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v06n10p295 [CrossRef]

[6] Gorden W. J., Denny F. B. Factors influencing the equilibrium known as the iso electric point of plant tissue. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1926. 13:743-53.

[7] Gortner R. A. Outlines of biochemistry. 1929. New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc. 793p.

[8] Hartmann B. G., Hillig Fred. The use of lead acetate in the determination of the acidity of fruit products. Jour. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 1930. 13:259-65.

[9] Nigold T. C. Hydrogen concentration of plant tissues. X. Buffers of potato tuber. Protoplasma. 1929. 4:51-59.

[10] Leuthardt F. Buffer capacity and plant juices. Kolloidchem. Beihefte. 1927. 25:1-68.

[11] McClung L. S. A note on reaction changes during sterilization of vegetable extract culture media. Jour. Bact. 1932. 24:457-59.

[12] Nelson E. K., Browne C. A. Properties and chemical constitution of glucic acids. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1929. 51:830-36. DOI: 10.1021/ja01378a025 [CrossRef]

[13] Oakley M., Krantz J. C. Jr. The buffer capacity of tomato juice. Indus. and Engin. Chem. 1936. 8:205-6. DOI: 10.1021/ac50101a022 [CrossRef]

[14] Russo G. Factors which determine or modify the buffer value of certain vegetables. Bul. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1930. 5:490-2.

[15] Small J. Hydrogen ion concentrations in plant cells and tissues. 1929. Berlin: Borntraeger Bros. 421p.

[16] Van Slyke D. D. The measurement of buffer values and the relationship of buffer value to the disassociation constant of the buffer and the concentration and reaction of the buffer solution. Jour. Biochem. 1922. 52:525-70.

Also in this issue:

Casing frozen strawberries: Automatic carton-casing and case sealing equipment effects substantial savings in fruit and vegetable freezing plants

Tree fruit cuttings propagated: Vegetative propagation of softwood cuttings of certain tree fruit rootstocks achieved by chemical and mist treatments

Weeds in drained rice fields: Early application of herbicides by air and by ground rig controlled weeds in drained rice fields in tests in 1956

Milled rice yields: Tests show yield and quality affected by drying-air temperature and humidity

Fertilizer placement for rice: Ammonium-form nitrogen drilled into seedbed before flooding increased rice yields 25% to 50% in placement experiments

Artichoke plume moth control: Experiments and field practices during 1949–1957 show value of properly timed parathion treatments and good sanitation

Artichoke production: Costs and returns to growers studied in survey conducted at Half Moon Bay

Imported parasites established: Natural enemies of the spotted alfalfa aphid brought from the Middle East in 1955–56 now established in California

Navel orangeworm: Summer infestations of codling moth on walnuts favorable to navel orangeworm

Effect of oil spray on lemons: Juice quality and yield were not affected by pest control sprays in tests made in two southern California orchards

Effect of storage on leaching of minerals and nitrogen from asparagus and peas during cooking