Success of mite-fighting tactics evaluated: In Central Valley, early-season release of Willamette mites confers resistance on wine grapes
Authors
Richard KarbanFrank Zalom
Authors Affiliations
R. Karbart is Insect Ecologist, Department of Entomology, UC Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 52(6):21-24. DOI:10.3733/ca.v052n06p21. November 1998.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Wine grapes in the Central Valley serve as hosts for several species of mites. Because these species have radically different economic effects, their correct identification is essential. Field trials revealed that some management practices were far more successful than others. For instance, treatments with dicofol (a miticide) and car-baryl (for leafhoppers) produced resurgences of mite populations to damaging levels. Releases of predaceous mites provided inconsistent control of herbivorous mites, and cover crops did not provide any clear advantages for mite management, although they may have other benefits. However, releases of Willamette mites at low densities early in the growing season consistently reduced chronically high populations of Pacific mites throughout the season. (Willamette mites, though they can become pests, are not damaging at low densities.) Scientists do not fully understand how Willamette mite releases confer plant protection, but evidence suggests they stimulate the host plant to reduce fecundity and survival of Pacific mites. Manipulations of host plant resistance offer new possibilities for control of pests such as spider mites.
References
English-Loeb GM, Karban R, Hougen-Eitzman D. Direct and indirect competition between spider mites feeding on grapes. Ecological Applications. 1993. 3:699-707. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942101
English-Loeb G, Karban R, Walker MA. Genotypic variation in constitutive and induced resistance in grapes against spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) herbivores. Environ Entomol. 1998. 27:297-304.
Flaherty DL, Hoy MA. Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin Valley vineyards. III. Role of tydeid mites. Researches on Population Ecology. 1971. 13:80-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522015
Flaherty DL, Huffaker CB. Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin valley vineyards. Part 1. The role of Metaseiulus occidentalis. Hilgaidia. 1970. 40:267-308.
Flaherty DL, Wilson LT, Welter SC, Flaherty DL, Christensen LP, Lanini WT, et al. Spider mites. Grape Pest Management. Second Edition. 1992. Berkeley, California: Agricultural Scientific Publications. p. 180-92.
Hanna R, Zalom FG, Wilson LT, Leavitt GM. Sulfur can suppress mite predators in vineyards. Cal Ag. 1997. 51(01):19-21.
Karban R, English-Loeb G, Hougen-Eitzman D. Mite vaccinations for sustainable management of spider mites in vineyards. Ecological Applications. 1997. 7:183-93. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0183:MVFSMO]2.0.CO;2
Kinn DN, Doutt RL. Initial survey of arthropods found in north coast vineyards in California. Environ Entomol. 1972. 1:508-13.
Thaler JS, Stout MJ, Karban R, Duffey SS. Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. J Chemical Ecology. 1996. 22:1767-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028503
Welter SC, Freeman R, Farnham DS. Willamette mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) impact on grape productivity and quality: a reappraisal. Environ Entomol. 1989. 18:408-11.
Also in this issue:
Early stage infiltration of water into horizontal and vertical soil columnsBiotechnology: New benefits, new questions
Science briefs
UC contributes biotech breakthroughs
Public germplasm development at a crossroads: Biotechnology and intellectual property
Transgenic Bt crops and resistance: Broadscale use of pest-killing plants to be true test
Native gray ant has beneficial role in peach orchards
Feasibility of producing pear wine: Pears produce premium sparkling wine
Cost analysis: Méthod champenoise sparkling pear wine costs most, but offers highest quality