Transgenic Bt crops and resistance: Broadscale use of pest-killing plants to be true test
Author
Brian A. FedericiAuthor Affiliations
B.A. Federici is Professor, Department of Entomology and Interdepartmental Graduate Programs in Genetics and Microbiology, UC Riverside.Publication Information
Hilgardia 52(6):14-20. DOI:10.3733/ca.v052n06p14. November 1998.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
More than 10 million acres of transgenic insect-resistant crops, including cotton, corn and potatoes, were planted in the United States in 1998 — and growers are on the verge of much more extensive plantings. Genetically engineered to produce insecticidal proteins of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, these plants provide effective, environmentally safe pest control. However, current transgenic crops may lead to insect resistance, partly because they have been engineered to produce only single Bt insecticidal proteins, and partly because plant senescence can result in lower production of Bt proteins as crop plants age. Australia cotton growers, for instance, found they had good control for the first half of the season in 1997, but required insecticide treatments in the latter half. Resistance avoidance strategies and crop varieties in the pipeline that produce two or more insecticidal proteins are planned to provide long-term resistance management. This is crucial not only to growers using the transformed crops, but to organic growers who rely on traditional Bt insecticides. If successful, this new technology promises high crop yields as well as benefits to most nontarget arthropods and biological control insects by reducing the use of broad-spectrum chemical insecticides.
References
Bauer L.S. Resistance: a threat to the insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.. Fla Entomol. 1995. 78:414-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3495527
Federici BA, Bauer LS. Cyt1A is toxic to the beetle Chyrsomela scripta, and suppresses high levels of resistance to Cry3A. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998. 64:4368-71. PubMed PMID: 9797292
Qeorghiou GP, Wirth MC. Influence of exposure to single versus multiple toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis on development of resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997. 63:1095-101.
Gill SS, Cowles EA, Pietrantonio PV. The mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins. Ann Rev Entomol. 1992. 37:615-36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003151
Gould F. Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: Integrating pest genetics and ecology. Ann Rev Entomol. 1998. 43:701-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701
Gould F, Anderson A, Reynolds A, et al. Selection and genetic analysis of a Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) strain with high levels of resistance to some Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J Econ Ent. 1995. 88:1545-59.
Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztei-Carey M, et al. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). 1998. Environ Ent 27: In press.
Hofte H, Whiteley HR. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.. Microbiol Revs. 1989. 53:242-55.
Knowles BH, Dow JAT. The crystal delta-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis: Models for their mechanism of action on the insect gut. BioEssays. 1993. 15:469-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950150706
McGaughey WH, Whalon F. Managing resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Science. 1992. 258:1451-5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.5087.1451 PubMed PMID: 17755107
Wirth MC, Georghiou GP, Federici BA. CytA enables CrylV toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CrylV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997. 94:10536-40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10536 PubMed PMID: 9380670
Schnepf S, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Molec Biol Revs. 1998. 62:775-806.
Tabashnik BE. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.. Ann Rev Entomol. 1994. 39:47-79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000403
Also in this issue:
Early stage infiltration of water into horizontal and vertical soil columnsBiotechnology: New benefits, new questions
Science briefs
UC contributes biotech breakthroughs
Public germplasm development at a crossroads: Biotechnology and intellectual property
Success of mite-fighting tactics evaluated: In Central Valley, early-season release of Willamette mites confers resistance on wine grapes
Native gray ant has beneficial role in peach orchards
Feasibility of producing pear wine: Pears produce premium sparkling wine
Cost analysis: Méthod champenoise sparkling pear wine costs most, but offers highest quality