Effect of Pesticide Treatments on Nontarget Organisms in California Rice Paddies: I. Impact of Triphenyltin hydroxide: II. Impact of Diflubenzuron and Triflumuron
Authors
A. A. GrigarickR. K. Webster
R. P. Meyer
F. G. Zalom
K. A. Smith
Authors Affiliations
A. A. Grigarick was Professor and Entomologist in the Experiment Station, University of California, Davis; R. K. Webster was Professor and Plant Pathologist in the Experiment Station, University of California, Davis; R. P. Meyer was Entomologist at the Kern Mosquito Abatement District, University of California, Bakersfield; F. G. Zalom was Director of the Integrated Pest Management Implimentation Group, University of California, Davis; K. A. Smith was Senior Entomologist at BIOSYS, Palo Alto, California.Publication Information
Hilgardia 58(1):1-36. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v58n01p036. August 1990.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
An application of triphenyltin hydroxide at 1.16 kg (AI)/ha to rice fields for stem rot (Sclerotium oryzae Catt.) control resulted in a significant reduction of 57% of the invertebrate taxa and 67% fewer individuals based on two collecting methods that sampled the nekton, neuston, and benthon. Populations of herbivores, carnivores, and filter feeders were sharply reduced after treatment, and most remained so through the 28th day following application. By day 50 many of the winged species recovered in both numbers and diversity. However, recovery of benthic organisms was slower or not at all for most Crustacea. An initial reduction followed by a strong resurgence was noted for the mosquito Culex tarsalis Coq., which was probably due to the significant reduction of five predaceous species.
Two benzoylphenyl ureas, diflubenzuron and triflumuron, were evaluated in California rice fields to determine their ecological impact on populations of nontarget organisms. Modified minnow traps, drag net, and kellen dredge sampling devices were used in the collecting. Nontarget populations were sampled continuously throughout much of the 1985 and 1986 rice growing season. Total collections of nontargets showed only two Cypris species of seed shrimp crustaceans were significantly (P<0.05) reduced over time due to either chemical. One predaceous water boatman, Corisella decolor, showed the opposite pattern in that populations were significantly (P<0.05) lower in the control. Significant differences were not observed in species diversity or between treatments when grand means for all species by sampling device were calculated. A total of 35 families and 58 taxa were collected from these two studies.
Literature Cited
Ables J. R., Jones S. L., Bee M. J. Effects of diflubenzuron on beneficial arthropods associated with cotton. Southwest Entomol. 1977. 2:66-72.
Ali A., Lord J. Impact of experimental insect growth regulators on some nontarget aquatic invertebrates. Mosq. News. 1980. 40:564-71.
Ali A., Mulla M. S. The IGR diflubenzuron and organophosphorous insecticides against nuisance midges in man-made residential-recreational lakes. J. Econ. Entomol. 1977. 70:571-77.
Ali A., Mulla M. S. Effects of chironomid larvicides and diflubenzuron on nontarget invertebrates in residential-recreational lakes. Environ. Entomol. 1978a. 7:21-27.
Ali A., Mulla M. S. Impact of the insect growth regulator diflubenzuron on invertebrates in a residential-recreational lake. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 1978b. 7:483-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02332073 [CrossRef]
Apperson C. S., Schaefer C. H., Colwell A. E., Werner G. H., Anderson N. L., Dupras E. F. Jr., Longanecker D. R. Effects of diflubenzuron on Chaoborus astictopus and nontarget organisms and persistence of diflubenzuron in lentic habitats. J. Econ. Entomol. 1978. 71:521-27.
Broadbent A. B., Pree D. J. Effects of diflubenzuron and BAY SIR 8514 on beneficial insects associated with peach. Environ. Entomol. 1984. 13:133-36.
Clement S. L., Grigarick A. A., Way M. O. The colonization of California rice paddies by Chironomid midges. J. App. Ecol. 1977. 14:379-89. DOI: 10.2307/2402551 [CrossRef]
Colwell A. E., Schaefer C. H. Effects of the insect growth regulator BAY SIR 8514 on pest diptera and nontarget aquatic organisms. Can. Ent. 1981. 113:185-91. DOI: 10.4039/Ent113185-3 [CrossRef]
Darby R. E. Midges associated with California rice fields, with special reference to their ecology (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hilgardia. 1962. 32:1 206 pp DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v32n01p001 [CrossRef]
Duncan D. B. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955. 11:1-42. DOI: 10.2307/3001478 [CrossRef]
Edmondson W. T. Fresh-water biology. 1959. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley &; Sons. 1248p.
Ellgaard J. T., Barker J. T., Tiwari S. C., Friend A. L. An analysis of the swimming behavior of fish exposed to the insect growth regulators, methoprene and diflubenzuron. Mosq. News. 1979. 39:311-14.
Farlow J. E., Breaud T. P., Steelman C. D., Schilling P. E. Effects of the insect growth regulator diflubenzuron on non-target aquatic populations in a Louisiana intermediate marsh. Environ. Entomol. 1978. 7:199-204.
Grigarick A. A. General problems with rice invertebrate pests and their control in the United States. Protection Ecology. 1984. 7:105-14.
Hansen S. R., Garton R. R. Ability of standard toxicity tests to predict the effects of the insecticide, diflubenzuron, on laboratory stream communities. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 1982a. 39:1273-88. DOI: 10.1139/f82-169 [CrossRef]
Hansen S. R., Garton R. R. The effects of diflubenzuron on a complex laboratory stream community. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 1982b. 11:1-10. DOI: 10.1007/BF01055179 [CrossRef]
Jackson L. F., Webster R. K., Wick C. M., Bolstad J., Wilkerson J. A. Chemical control of stem rot of rice in California. Phytopathology. 1977. 67:1155-58. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-67-1155 [CrossRef]
Keever D. W., Bradley J. R., Ganyard M. C. Effects of diflubenzuron (Dimilin) on selected beneficial arthropods in cotton fields. Environ. Entomol. 1977. 6:732-36.
Kellen W. R. A new bottom sampler. Limnol. Soc. A. Spec. Publ. 1954. 22:1-3.
Meister R. T. Farm chemicals handbook. 1986. Willoughby, OH: Meister Publishing Co. P. C 241
Merritt R. W., Cummins K. W. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 1978. Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co. 441p.
Miura T., Takahashi R. M., Walker W. H. The effect of BAY SIR 8514 against selected organisms associated with mosquito breeding habitats 1983. pp.80-85. Proc. Papers 51st Ann. Conf. Calif. Mosq. Vector Cont. Assoc
Mulla M. S., Darwazeh H. A. Evaluation of insect growth regulators against chironomids in experimental ponds. Proc. Calif. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 1975. 43:164-68.
Nebeker A. V., McKinney P., Cairns M. A. Acute and chronic effects of diflubenzuron (dimilin) on freshwater fish and invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1983. 2:329-36. DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620020309 [CrossRef]
Pennak R. W. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. 1978. New York: John Wiley &; Sons. 803p.
Rodrigues C. S., Kaushik N. K. Laboratory evaluation of the insect growth regulator diflubenzuron against black fly (Diptera: Simuliidae) larvae and its effects on nontarget stream invertebrates. Can. Ent. 1986. 118:549-58. DOI: 10.4039/Ent118549-6 [CrossRef]
Schaefer C. H., Miura T., Dupras E. F. Jr., Wilder W. H. Environmental impact of the fungicide triphenyltin hydroxide after application to rice fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 1981. 74:597-600.
Shannon C. E., Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. 1949. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Smith K. A., Grigarick A. A., Lynch J. H., Oraze M. J. Effect of alsystin and diflubenzuron on the rice water weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1985. 78:185-89.
Smith K. A., Grigarick A. A. Field evaluations of diflubenzuron and triflumuron for control of the rice water weevil in California rice fields. J. Agric. Entomol. 1988. 5:121-26.
Steelman C. D., Farlow J. E., Breaud T. P., Schilling P. I. Effects of growth regulators on Psorophora columbiae (Dyer and Knab) and non-target aquatic insect species in rice fields. Mosq. News. 1975. 35:67-76.
Usinger R. L. Aquatic insects of California. 1956. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 508p.
Yahner R. H., Quinn J. L., Grimm J. W. Effects of a nonpersistanct insecticide (Alsystin) on abundance patterns of breeding forest birds. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 1985. 34:68-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF01609704 [CrossRef]
Also in this issue:
California's growing diversity drives profound changeLetters: January-March 2004
Science briefs: January-March 2004
Toll-free number aids Spanish-speaking firestorm victims; UC reserve burns
“Pre-caucusing” improves labor mediation
Rural youth report more frequent smoking and drinking
Eatfit guides adolescents to improve health and fitness
Yo-yo dieting drives up obesity
How can Californians be overweight and hungry?
Food insecurity prominent among low-income California Latinos
Rural Latino families in California are missing earned income tax benefits
Project engages culturally diverse parents in Proposition 10 decisions
Expanded production of labor-intensive crops increases agricultural employment
Irrigation and planting density affect river red gum growth
Autoguidance system operated at high speed causes almost no tomato damage
Drip irrigation evaluated in Santa Maria Valley strawberries
In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds
Tomato pomace may be a good source of vitamin E in broiler diets