Autoguidance system operated at high speed causes almost no tomato damage
Authors
Aziz Z. AbidineBrian C. Heidman
Shrini K. Upadhyaya
David J. Hills
Authors Affiliations
A.Z. Abidine is Graduate Research Assistants; B.C. Heidman is Graduate Research Assistants; S.K. Upadhyaya is Professors, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, UC Davis. The authors are grateful to the California Energy Commission (CEC) for financial support; Trimble Navigation for equipping our JD 8700 tractor with their autopilot system; and Button and Turkovich for assisting with the experimental design and providing transplanting and cultivation equipment. We also thank Ricardo Amon of the CEC and Eric Arvesen and Bruce Stevens of Trimble Navigation for their input at various stages of this project, and Uriel Rosa, Flavio Mazetto, Eduardo Cleto and Pedro Andrade for their assistance; D.J. Hills is Professors, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, UC Davis. The authors are grateful to the California Energy Commission (CEC) for financial support; Trimble Navigation for equipping our JD 8700 tractor with their autopilot system; and Button and Turkovich for assisting with the experimental design and providing transplanting and cultivation equipment. We also thank Ricardo Amon of the CEC and Eric Arvesen and Bruce Stevens of Trimble Navigation for their input at various stages of this project, and Uriel Rosa, Flavio Mazetto, Eduardo Cleto and Pedro Andrade for their assistance.Publication Information
Hilgardia 58(1):44-47. DOI:10.3733/ca.v058n01p44. January 2004.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
This project explored the effectiveness of an autoguidance system based on a real-time kinematic global positioning system (RTK GPS) accurate to the centimeter (about half-inch) in agricultural production. Our objectives were to determine the effect of spacing between cultivator disks or knives and forward tractor speed on plant damage, and of deep tillage operations on drip-tape damage. Two sets of split-plot field experiments were conducted (with processing tomato transplants and direct-seeded tomatoes) in a Yolo loam field on the UC Davis campus. No significant plant damage occurred even at 7 miles per hour (mph) forward speed and cultivator disk spacing of 2 inches from the plant line. In an additional split-plot test, there was no significant damage to drip tape when the fertilizer shank was operated 2 inches from the drip tape at 3.5 mph. This system allows for automatic steering of the tractor and implements along a path close to buried drip-tape and/or plants without damaging them, even at high operational ground speeds.
References
Billingsley J., Schoenfisch M. The successful development of a vision guidance system for agriculture. Computer Electron Ag. 1997. 16(2):147-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(96)00034-8
[CTRI] California Tomato Research Institute. Annual report. 2001. Escalon, CA.
Debain C, Chateau T, Berducat M, et al. A guidance assistance system for agricultural vehicles. Computer Electron Ag. 2000. 25(1-2):29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00054-X
Ehsani MR, Mattson M, Upadhyaya SK. An ultra-precise, GPS-based planter for site-specific cultivation and plant-specific chemical application. Paper No 3065, presented at 2000 ASAE Meeting, Milwaukee, WI 2000.
Keicher R, Seufert H. Automatic guidance for agricultural vehicles in Europe. Computer Electron Ag. 2000. 25(1-2):169-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00062-9
Marchant JA, Hague T, Tillett ND. Row following accuracy of an autonomous vision-guided agricultural vehicle. Computer Electron Ag. 1997. 16(2):165-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(96)00031-2
Reid JF, Zhang Q, Noguchi N, Dickson M. Agricultural automatic guidance research in North America. Computer Electron Ag. 2000. 25(1-2):155-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00061-7
Tillett ND. Automatic guidance sensors for agricultural field machines — a review. J Agr Eng Res. 1991. 50:167-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(05)80012-5
Torii T. Research in autonomous vehicles in Japan. Computer Electron Ag. 2000. 25(1-2):133-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00060-5
Wilson JN. Guidance of agricultural vehicles — a historical perspective. Computer Electron Ag. 2000. 25(1-2):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00052-6
Also in this issue:
Effect of Pesticide Treatments on Nontarget Organisms in California Rice Paddies: I. Impact of Triphenyltin hydroxide: II. Impact of Diflubenzuron and TriflumuronCalifornia's growing diversity drives profound change
Letters: January-March 2004
Science briefs: January-March 2004
Toll-free number aids Spanish-speaking firestorm victims; UC reserve burns
“Pre-caucusing” improves labor mediation
Rural youth report more frequent smoking and drinking
Eatfit guides adolescents to improve health and fitness
Yo-yo dieting drives up obesity
How can Californians be overweight and hungry?
Food insecurity prominent among low-income California Latinos
Rural Latino families in California are missing earned income tax benefits
Project engages culturally diverse parents in Proposition 10 decisions
Expanded production of labor-intensive crops increases agricultural employment
Irrigation and planting density affect river red gum growth
Drip irrigation evaluated in Santa Maria Valley strawberries
In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds
Tomato pomace may be a good source of vitamin E in broiler diets