The effects of different pasture and rangeland ecosystems on the annual dynamics of insects in cattle droppings
AuthorsRichard W. Merritt
John R. Anderson
Authors AffiliationsRichard W. Merritt was Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing; he was formerly Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Entomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley; John R. Anderson was Professor of Entomology, Department of Entomological Sciences, U.C. Berkeley.
Hilgardia 45(2):31-70. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v45n02p031. May 1977.
A 2-yr study (1971-73) in the Sierra Nevada foothills of California consisted of: 1) a quantitative analysis of the differences in diversity and abundance of the insect fauna colonizing and inhabiting diurnally and nocturnally excreted cattle droppings in four different pasture and rangeland ecosystems (natural woodland range, partially cleared woodland range, totally cleared woodland range, cultivated irrigated pasture); and 2) a study of the relationship between the diversity and abundance of insect inhabitants per cowpat and the rate of pat degradation.
The fauna consisted of three orders of insects containing 26 families and 102 species. There were 35 to 40 different kinds of Coleoptera, 50 of Diptera, and 12 of Hymenoptera, recorded from samples.
Differences per pat in the mean number of species, number of individuals, and insect biomass among pastures, months, and years for the major taxa were analyzed and discussed. The pasture ecosystem and the season were most important in determining the diversity and abundance of insects colonizing droppings. Major differences among pastures in the number of individuals and species per pat were mainly due to a combination of interacting loco-and microclimatological factors associated with the environment of the different pastures. Most species of dung insects did not colonize pats dropped during the night.
The most important insect species influencing biomass per pat was the scarab, Aphodius fimetarius (L.). The importance of considering species, individuals, and biomass in attempting to understand changes in community structure and function was demonstrated.
Allee W. C., Emerson A. E., Park O., Park T., Schmidt K. P. Principles of animal ecology. 1948. London: W. B. Saunders Co. 837p.
Anderson J. R., Hoy J. B. Relationship between host attack rates and CO2-baited insect flight trap catches of certain Symphoromyia species. J. Med. Entomol. 1972. 9:373-393.
Anderson J. R., Merritt R. W. The impact of foraging meadowlarks, Sturnella neglecta, on the degradation of cattle dung pads. J. Appl. Ecol. 1977. (In press.)
Bay D. E., Pitts C. W., Ward G. Influence of moisture content of bovine feces on oviposition and development of the face fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 1969. 62:41-44.
Biswell H. H. Ecology of California grasslands. J. Range Manage. 1956. 9:19-24. DOI: 10.2307/3894645 [CrossRef]
Blume R. R. Insects associated with bovine droppings in Kerr and Bexar counties, Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 1970. 63:1023-1024.
Blume R. R. Additional insects associated with bovine droppings in Kerr and Bexar counties, Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 1972. 65:621
Bollen W. B. Interactions between pesticides and soil microorganisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1961. 15:69-92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.15.100161.000441 [CrossRef]
Bornemissza G. F. Could dung-eating insects improve our pastures?. J. Australian Inst. Agr. Sci. 26:54-56. Insectary studies on the control of dung breeding flies by the activity of the dung beetle, Onthophagus gazella F (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). J. Australian Entomol. Soc. 1970, 9L 31-41 1960
Bornemissza G. F., Williams C. H. An effect of dung beetle activity on plant yield. Pedobiologia. 1970. 10:1-7.
Borror D. J., Belong D. M. An introduction to the study of insects. 1971. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 812p.
Bruce W. G. The history and biology of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Linnaeus), with comments on control. North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 1964. 157:32
Cornelius D. R. Use of range grasses on burned over brush and timber land in California 1966. pp.169-220. Proc. 4th Ann. Tall Timbers Fire Ecol. Conf.
Duncan D. B. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955. 11:1-42. DOI: 10.2307/3001478 [CrossRef]
Ferrar P. The CSIRO dung beetle project. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding. 1973. 20:73-75.
Finne D., Desiere M. Etude Sunecologique des bouses de Bovides 1. Evolution estivale de la biomasse des Coleopteres en fonction du vieillissement des bouses. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 1971. 8:409-417.
Foster W. A. Predatory behavior of Scatophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in California. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1970. 63:338-339.
Francis A. J., Spanggord R. J., Ouchi G. I. Degradation of Lindane by Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. 1975. 29:567-568.
Gary C. E., Wingo C. W. Factors affecting parasitism of the face fly by Aphaereta pallipes in laboratory studies. J. Econ. Entomol. 1971. 64:104-107.
Gillard P. Coprophagous beetles in pasture ecosystems. J. Australian Inst. Agr. Sci. 1967. 33:30-34.
Greenham P. M. A study of the effects of the variability of cattle dung on the multiplication of the bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walk.). J. Anim. Ecol. 1972. 41:153-165. DOI: 10.2307/3510 [CrossRef]
Hafez M. Some ecological observations on the insect fauna of dung. Bull. Soc. Fouad. Entomol. 1939. 23:241-387.
Halffter G., Matthews E. G. The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol. Mex. 1966. 12-14:1-312.
Hammer O. Biological and ecological investigations of flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. Vidensk. Medd. Naturhist. Foren. Kobenhavn. 1941. 105:141-393.
Hart W. E., Borrelli J. Mechanized surface irrigation systems for rolling lands. Water Resources Center Contrib. 1970. Davis: Univ. Calif. 133p.
Houser E. C., Wingo C. W. Laboratory cultures and biology of Orthellia caesarion with notes on determining larval instars. J. Econ. Entomol. 1967. 60:1355-1358.
Hughes R. D. Introduced dung beetles and Australian pasture ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 1975. 12:819-837. DOI: 10.2307/2402093 [CrossRef]
Hughes R. D., Walker J., Watson A. The role of food in the population dynamics of the Australian bushfly. Animal populations in relation to their food resources 10th Sym. British Ecol. Soc. 1970. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Sci. Publ. p. 255-269.
Hughes R. D., Greenham P. M., Tyndale-Biscoe M., Walker J. M. A synopsis of observations on the biology of the Australian bushfly Musca vetustissima (Walker). J. Australian Entomol. Soc. 1972. 11:311-331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1972.tb01635.x [CrossRef]
Kay B. L. Hardinggrass and annual legume production in the Sierra foothills. J. Range Manage. 1969. 22:174-177. DOI: 10.2307/3896336 [CrossRef]
Koskela H. Habitat selection of dung-inhabiting staphylinids (Coleoptera) in relation to age of the dung. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1972. 9:156-171.
Landin B. O. Ecological studies on dung beetles. Opuscula Entomol. Suppl. 1961. 19:1-228.
Landin B. O. The diel flight activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Opuscula Entomol. Suppl. 1968. 32:1-172.
Landin J. On the relationship between the microclimate in cow droppings and some species of Sphaeridium (Col. Hydrophilidae). Opuscula Entomol. 1967. 32:207-212.
Larsen E. B., Thomsen M. The influence of temperature on the development of some species of Diptera. Vidensk. Medd. Dansk naturf. For. København. 1941. 104:1-75.
Laurence B. R. The larval inhabitants of cowpats. J. Anim. Ecol. 1954. 23:234-260. DOI: 10.2307/1982 [CrossRef]
Lewis J. K., van Dyne G. M. Range management viewed in the ecosystem framework. Chapt. VI. 1969. New York: Academic Press. p. 97-187. 383 p. The ecosystem concept in natural resource management
Lindquist A. W. Amounts of dung buried and soil excavated by certain Coprini (Scarabaeidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 1933. 6:109-125.
Lindquist A. W. Notes on the habits of certain coprophagous beetles and methods of rearing them. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 1935. 351:1-10.
MacDiarmid B. N., Watkin B. R. The cattle dung patch 3. Distribution and rate of decay of dung patches and their influence on grazing behaviour. J. Brit. Grassld. Soc. 1972. 27:48-54.
MacQueen A. Horn fly breeding, nitrogen loss and nutrient immobilization associated with cattle dung in the Southern Interior of British Columbia 1973. p.211. Ph.D. Diss., Simon Fraser Univ., Burnaby, B.C.
MacQueen A., Beirne B. P. Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), from cattle dung in south central British Columbia. Canadian Entomol. 1975. 107:1255-65. DOI: 10.4039/Ent1071255-12 [CrossRef]
McDaniel B., Boddicker M. L., Balsbaugh E. U. Jr. Coleoptera inhabiting bovine manure in a pasture on the Big Sioux River flood plain in South Dakota. Proc. S. Dak. Acad. Sci. 1971. 50:220-237.
McLusky D. S. Some estimates of the areas fouled by the excreta of dairy cows. J. Brit. Grassld. Soc. 1960. 15:181-188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1960.tb00176.x [CrossRef]
Merritt R. W. The species diversity and abundance of insects inhabiting cattle droppings and their role in the degradation of dung in four different pasture and rangeland ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada foothills of California 1974. p.273. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Merritt R. W. A review of the food habits of the insect fauna inhabiting cattle droppings in north central California. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 1976. 52:13-22.
Merritt R. W., Poorbaugh J. H. A laboratory collection and rearing container for insects emerging from cattle droppings. Calif. Vector Views. 1975. 22:43-46.
Mohr C. O. Cattle droppings as ecological units. Ecol. Monogr. 1943. 13:275-309. DOI: 10.2307/1943223 [CrossRef]
Morgan C. E., Thomas G. D. Annotated bibliography of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), including references on the buffalo fly, H. exigua (de Meijere), and other species belonging to the genus Haematobia. U. S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Pub. 1974. 1278:1-134.
Morgan N. O. Autecology of the adult horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), (Diptera: Muscidae). Ecology. 1964. 45:728-736. DOI: 10.2307/1934920 [CrossRef]
Myrcha A. Bioenergetics of the development period of Copris lunaris L. Ekol. Polska. 1973. 21:1-35.
Papp L. Ecological and production biological data on the significance of flies breeding in cattle droppings. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae. 1971. 17:91-105.
Parker G. A. The reproductive behavior and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). IV. Epigamic recognition and competition between males for the possession of females. Behavior. 1970. 37:113-139.
Peterson R. G., Lucas H. L., Woodhouse W. W. Jr. The distribution of excreta by freely grazing cattle and its effect on pasture fertility: I. Excretal distribution. Agron. J. 1956. 48:440-444.
Pielou E. C. Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. J. Theoret. Biol. 1966. 10:370-382. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90133-0 [CrossRef]
Poorbaugh J. H. Ecological studies on the insect inhabitants of undisturbed cattle droppings 1966. p.159. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Calif., Berkeley.
Poorbaugh J. H., Anderson J. R., Burger J. F. The insect inhabitants of undisturbed cattle droppings in northern California. Calif. Vector Views. 1968. 15:17-35.
Rainio M. Abundance and phenology of some coprophagous beetles in different kinds of dung. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1966. 3:88-98.
Sanders D. P., Dobson R. C. The insect complex associated with bovine manure in Indiana. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1966. 59:955-959.
Shannon C. E., Weaver W. W. The mathematical theory of communication. 1949. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press. 117p.
Smith T. A., Linsdale D. D., Burdick D. J. An annotated bibliography of the face fly, Musca autumnalis DeGeer, in North America. Calif. Vector Views. 1966. 13:44-53.
Smith T. A., Linsdale D. D. First-fourth supplements to an annotated bibliography of the face fly Musca autumnalis DeGeer, in North America. Calif. Vector Views. 1967, 1968, 1969, 1971. 18(14):74-76. 15, 119-121, 16: 119-123; 17-19
Smith T. A., Krancher J. A. Fifth supplement to an annotated bibliography of the face fly, Musca autumnalis DeGeer, in North America. Calif. Vector Views. 1974. 21:9-13.
Snowball G. J. A consideration of the insect population associated with cow dung at Crawley, W. A. J. Roy. Soc. West. Australia. 1944. 28:219-245.
Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J. Biometry. 1969. San Francisco, Calif.: Freeman and Co. 776p.
Teichert M. Die bodenbiologische Bedeutung der coprophagen Lamellicornier. Wiss. Z. Univ. Halle, Math. Nat. 1959. 8(6):879-882.
Teichert M. Biologie und Brutfursorgeverhalten von Copris lunaris L. Verhandlungen uber den XI, internationalen Entomologenkongress 1961. pp.621-625. Wien 1960
Valiela I. The arthropod fauna of bovine dung in central New York and sources on its natural history. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 1969a. 77:210-220.
Valiela I. An experimental study of the mortality factors of larval Musca autumnalis DeGeer. Ecol. Monogr. 1969b. 39:119-225. DOI: 10.2307/1950742 [CrossRef]
Valiela I. Composition, food webs and population limitation in dung arthropod communities during invasion and succession. Amer. Midl. Natur. 1974. 92:370-385. DOI: 10.2307/2424302 [CrossRef]
van Dyne G. M. Ecosystems, systems ecology, and systems ecologists. 1966. U. S. At. Energy Comm. Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. ORNL-3957: 1-40.
Waterhouse D. F. The biological control of dung. Sci. Amer. 1974. 230:100-109. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0474-100 [CrossRef]
Weeda W. C. The effect of cattle dung patches on pasture growth, botanical composition and pasture utilization. New Zealand J. Agr. Res. 1967. 10:150-156. DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1967.10423087 [CrossRef]
Wilhm J. L. Use of biomass units in Shannon’s formula. Ecology. 1968. 49:153-156. DOI: 10.2307/1933573 [CrossRef]
Wingo C. W., Thomas G. D., Clark G. N., Morgan C. E. Succession and abundance of insects in pasture manure: relationship to face fly survival. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1974. 67:386-390.
Also in this issue:Publicly funded agricultural research: An impending crisis?
Can farmers use water more effectively?: Two on-farm demonstrations compare irrigation methods
Reducing drainwater: Furrow vs. subsurface drip irrigation
Subsurface drip produced highest net return in Westlands area study
Analysis: Demonstration projects compared
South Sierra oak regeneration wak in sapling stage
How quality relates to price in California fresh peaches
Trace elements limit potential for blending San Joaquin drainwater with canal water
Low-input technology proves viable for limited-resource farmers in Salinas Valley
Treatment of destructive elm leaf beetle should be timed by temperature
To control mealybugs, stop honeydew-seeking ants
If registered, fungicide could reduce cavity spot of carrots
Phylloxera on rise…: Deadly insect pest poses increased risk to north coast vineyards