Field observations on the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus, in California
Author
Henry H. P. SeverinAuthor Affiliations
Henry H. P. Severin was Associate Entomologist in the Experiment Station.Publication Information
Hilgardia 7(8):281-360. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v07n08p281. January 1933.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
During 1918-1932 field investigations were carried on to determine where the beet leafhopper spends the winter and to locate the natural breeding areas in this state. Trips were taken to Death Valley, Mojave Desert, Imperial Valley, and the Tulare Lake and Bakersfieid sections of the San Joaquin Valley—areas from which Ball(2) believed the beet leafhopper migrated into sugar-beet fields—and also to the middle and northern sections of the San Joaquin Valley, to the Sacramento Valley, Santa Clara, and Salinas valleys, and to all other important sugar-beet districts in California. After a general survey of this enormous territory, it soon became evident that it would require many years of field work to map the natural breeding areas of this insect, and hence the work was limited to the San Joaquin, Sacramento, Santa Clara, and Salinas valleys and to several small valleys. No foothill investigation has been carried on in Death Valley, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert, and Imperial Valley. Such results as were obtained in these districts have been published in previous papers.(28), (30), (40)
The host plants of the beet leafhopper on the uncultivated plains and foothills, in the cultivated areas, and the original native host plants, the spring and summer dispersals and migrations, natural barriers, causes of fluctuation in population, and natural enemies were also observed during the investigations.
Distribution of Beet Leafhopper
The beet leafhopper is a native species and has been taken in western North America from Canada into Mexico. Davis(11) found the northern limit of the leafhopper was Cache Creek, British Columbia, 140 miles north of the international boundary. Carter(10) used the climograph as a means of comparing climates with respect to precipitation and temperatures in determining the probable limits of the range of the beet leafhopper; these studies were supplemented with surveys of the distribution of the insect. He considers that the presence of the leafhopper in British Columbia is due to a northward migration. Carter(9) published the results of the Canadian survey conducted by H. L. Seamans and states that the leafhopper was not found in the province of Alberta, although the results of the survey were not conclusive. Davis(11) found that the leafhopper was generally distributed in western Washington and Oregon.
Literature Cited
[1] Anderson J. B. Observations from airplanes of cloud and fog conditions along the southern California coast. U. S. Mo. Weather Rev. 1931. 59:264-270. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1931)59<264:OFAOCAreplacecodegt2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]
[2] Ball E. D. The beet leafhopper and the curly leaf disease that it transmits. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1917. 155:1-56.
[3] Blake D. Temperature inversions at San Diego, as deduced from aerographical observations by airplane. U. S. Mo. Weather Rev. 1928. 56:221-224. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1928)56<221:TIASDAreplacecodegt2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]
[4] Boncquet P. A. Discovery of curly leaf of sugar beets in the Argentine Republic. Phytopathology. 1923. 13:458-460.
[5] Brewer W. H., Watson S. Geological survey of California. Botany. 1880. 1:94-95.
[6] Byers H. R. Summer sea fogs of the central California coast. Univ. California Pubs. Geography. 1930. 3:291-338.
[7] California Agricultural Experiment Station. California Agricultural Experiment Station Annual Report 1927-28. 1928. p. 75-76.
[8] Carter W. A technique for use with homopterous vectors of plant disease, with special reference to the sugar beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 34: p. 449-451.
[9] Carter W. Extensions of the known range of Eutettix tenellus (Baker) and curly top of sugar beets. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1927. 20:714-717.
[10] Carter W. Ecological studies of the beet leafhopper. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 1930. 206:1-114.
[11] Davis E. W. Notes on collections of the sugar beet leafhopper showing the extensions of its known range into British Columbia and to the coast in Washington and Oregon. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1927. 20:581-586.
[12] De Long D. M. The occurrence of the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker), in the eastern United States. 1925.
[13] Fawcett G. L. Encrespamiento de las hojas de la remolacha azucarera. Revista Industrial y Agricola de Tucuman. 1925. 16:39-46.
[14] Fawcett G. L. The curly top of the sugar beet in the Argentine Republic. Phytopathology. 1927. 13:458-460.
[15] Haegele E. W. The beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1927. 156: p. 1-28.
[16] Hall H. M., Clements F. E. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy. The North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus and Atriplex. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 1923. 326: p. 1-355.
[17] Hartung W. J. Enemies of the leafhopper. Natural foes of Eutettix tenellus in California. Facts About Sugar. 1919. 7: p. 470-471. 492-493
[18] Hartung W. J. Evasion of curly leaf disease or “blight” Farm Bureau Monthly. Monterey County. 1924. 6 p. 13-16.
[19] Hartung W. J., Severin H. H. P. Natural enemies of the sugar beet leafhopper in California. California State Comn. Hort. Mo. Bul. 1915. 4:277-288.
[20] Henderson C. F. Exploration in the Argentine Republic for parasites of the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Econ. Ent. 1928. 21: p. 863-871.
[21] Hendry G. W., Kelly M. P. The plant content of adobe brick with a note on adobe brick making. California Hist. Soc. Quar. 1925. 4:361-373. DOI: 10.2307/25177783 [CrossRef]
[22] Jepson W. L. Manual of the flowering plants of California. 1925. Berkeley, Calif.: Assoc. Student Store, University of California. 1,238p.
[23] Kelly W. P. The present status of alkali. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 1920. 219:1-10. https://archive.org/details/presentstatusofa219kell
[24] Knowlton G. F. The beet leafhopper in Utah. A study of its distribution and the occurrence of the curly top. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1928. 205:1-23.
[25] Knowlton G. F. The beet leafhopper in northern Utah. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1932. 234:1-64.
[26] Schwing E. A. Utilization of systematic observations on beet leafhopper (Eutettix tenella Baker) and curly leaf of sugar beets. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1922. 15:365-368.
[27] Schwing E. A. Notes on Eutettix tenellus (Baker) in northern California, 1927. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1927. 20: p. 645-646.
[28] Severin H. H. P. The beet leafhopper. A report on investigations into its occurrence in California. Facts About Sugar. 1919. 8:130-131. 134; 150-151; 170-171, 173; 190-191; 210-211; 230-231; 250, 255
[29] Severin H. H. P. Notes on the behavior of the beet leafhopper Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Econ. Ent. 1919. 12: p. 303-308.
[30] Severin H. H. P. Investigations of the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker) in California. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1919. 12: p. 312-326.
[31] Severin H. H. P. Natural enemies of beet leafhopper. Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Econ. Ent. 1924. 17: p. 369-377.
[32] Severin H. H. P. A natural breeding area of the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker), in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1925. 18: p. 730-733.
[33] Severin H. H. P. Transmission of tomato yellows, or curly top of the sugar beet, by Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Hilgardia. 1928. 3: p. 251-274. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v03n10p251 [CrossRef]
[34] Severin H. H. P. Additional host plants of curly top. Hilgardia. 1929. 3:595-636. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v03n20p595 [CrossRef]
[35] Severin H. H. P. Life history of beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker) in California. Univ. California Pubs. Ent. 1930. 5: p. 37-88.
[36] Severin H. H. P., Henderson C. F. Beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker) does not occur in the Argentine Republic. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1928. 21: p. 542-544.
[37] Severin H. H. P., Henderson C. F. Some host plants of curly top. Hilgardia. 1928. 3:339-392. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v03n13p339 [CrossRef]
[38] Severin H. H. P., Schwing E. A. The 1925 outbreak of the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker) in California. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1926. 19: p. 478-483.
[39] Severin H. H. P., Severin H. C. Curly top of sugar beets in South Dakota. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1927. 20:586-588.
[40] Severin H. H. P., Thomas W. W. Notes on the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Econ. Ent. 1918. 11: p. 308-312.
[41] Stahl C. F. Studies on the life history and habits of the beet leafhopper. Jour. Agr. Research. 1920. 20:245-252.
[42] Thomson J. A. Migration of animals. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1929. 15:14th ed.473-474.
[43] Tutt J. W. The migration and dispersal of insects. 1902. London: E. Stock. 132p.
[44] United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology. Report of the entomologist. 1928. p. 1-34.
[45] Van Duzee E. P. Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences to the Gulf of California in 1921. The Hemiptera (True Bugs, etc.). California Acad. Sci. Proc. 1923. 12:123-200.
Also in this issue:
Milk pricing bases: Methods of pricing manufacturing and market milk suggestedMechanized cotton: Effects of machine topping and use of defoliants studied
Phosphated alfalfa feed-value: Preliminary studies made of feeding value of alfalfa hay from phosphate fertilized soils of the Imperial Valley
Garden centipede: Summer flooding has advantages in controlling pest in asparagus fields
Wind machines: 1953 report on frost protection tests in California citrus groves
Rice leaf miner: Severe attack controlled by water management, insecticide application
Lime-induced chlorosis: Chelating agents a possible means of control in citrus, avocado, and other subtropicals
Chlorosis in avocado: May be caused by nutrients in soil or genetic variations in the variety
Pre-packaged, bulk tomatoes: Survey of Berkeley housewives reveals practices in retail buying and opinions regarding quality and price
Golden pershaw: Seed of a new winter melon of good eating quality released
2, 4, 5-T on apricot: Effects include early maturity, larger fruits, less preharvest drop