University of California

UC must take lead in curricula reform, teacher training


Mary V. Price
Richard A. Cardullo

Authors Affiliations

Price has served as Chair and participant in curriculum-reform committees. Cardullo is involved in a variety of outreach activities to area schools.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 54(1):56-62. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n01p56. January 2000.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


California, once reputed to have the best public education system in the nation, finds itself ranked at or near the bottom at the end of the 20th century. Traditionally, the University of California has not been deeply involved in K-12 education, but the social and economic cost of an undereducated work-force in a global economy makes it imperative that all segments of California's system of higher education — including UC — get involved. The University can directly improve our public schools through outreach programs. At the same time, UC needs to improve its own curriculum, particularly in science and mathematics, and especially for prospective teachers. To prepare graduates for an increasingly technological world, curricula must be more interdisciplinary and inquiry-based, for science and for nonscience majors alike By breaking down traditional barriers that have prevented UC faculty from participating in curriculum reform efforts, UC can play a leadership role in providing Californians the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in the next century.


[ACE] American Council on Education. To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. Report of the Teacher Education Task Force 1999.

Atkinson RC. The future of the University of California. UC Office of the President 1998.

Atkinson RC. The golden fleece, science education, and US science policy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1999. 1433

California State Board of Education. Science content standards grades K-12. 1999. http://www.cde.ca.gov/board/board.html.

Elmore RF. Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harv Ed Rev. 1996. 66(1):1-26.

Hampel RL. A generation in crisis?. Daedalus. 1998. 127(4):67-88.

[NCES] National Center for Education Statistics. Reports on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. 1999a. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

[NCES] National Center for Education Statistics. Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. 1999b. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. 1983. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

[NRC] National Research Council. National Science Education Standards.. 1995. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. www.nas.edu .

[NSF] National Science Foundation. Shaping the Future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. 1996. Arlington, VA: Publication 96(139).

[UCOP] UC Office of the President. Report of the University-wide task force on faculty rewards. 1991.

[UCOP] UC Office of the President. The University of California: Approaching the 21st century. White paper for California Citizens' Commission on Higher Education 1997.

Price M, Cardullo R. 2000. UC must take lead in curricula reform, teacher training. Hilgardia 54(1):56-62. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n01p56
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu