Welfare reform shines a light on work-force development challenges
Author
David CampbellAuthor Affiliations
D. Campbell is Director, California Communities Program, Department of Human and Community Development, UC Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 54(1):35-40. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n01p35. January 2000.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
In August 1996, Congress passed sweeping reforms to the nation's welfare system, requiring most recipients to work and placing a 5-year limit on benefits. The California Communities Program at UC Davis has been studying the progress of welfare reform in six California counties, and comparing the state's experience to national trends. Through more than 200 interviews and an extensive literature review, we have found that welfare reform is succeeding in reducing caseloads and reinventing local social-service bureaucracies. But these changes must be joined with long-term job creation and work-force development strategies if they are to truly reduce poverty. California's welfare reform policies and experiences highlight the particular challenges facing rural counties, which generally have fewer staff resources, a less-developed infrastructure of nonprofit service organizations, and lower expectations about their ability to implement major reforms.
References
Fix M, Zimmerman W. All under one roof: Mixed status families in an era of reform. 1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. 21p.
Garkovich L, Irby J. Where the rubber meets the road: New governance issues in America's rural communities. Southern Rural Development Center: The Rural Community Consortium, Mississippi State University 1998. p.8.
Loprest P. Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing?. 1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. 27p.
Martin P. Welfare reform in rural California: Issues and challenges. California Community Topics, No 5. 1999. UC Davis: California Communities Program. 4p.
Nathan RP, Gais TL. A surprising first look: Implementing the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996. American Society for Public Administration: PA Times. 1999. 22(6):1-2.
RAND Statewide CalWORKs Evaluation. Welfare reform in California: State and county implementation of CalWORKs in the First Year. Santa Monica: RAND 1999. p.87.
Rural Policy Research Institute. Rural America and welfare reform: An overview assessment. Rural Welfare Reform Panel, University of Missouri 1999. p.35.
Also in this issue:
Simulated crop-water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline watersPopulation change to challenge Californians
Q&A: Hard choices ahead for growing world
Women, minority farmers are growing in California
Grandparents become primary parents
“Tidal Wave II” to hit higher education
Past, present and future: Immigration, high fertility fuel state's population growth
For California farmworkers, future holds little prospect for change
The new rural poverty: Central Valley evolving into patchwork of poverty and prosperity
The new rural California: Farmworkers putting down roots in Central Valley communities
How will the Central Valley economy grow?
‘Third’ institution needed to bridge family-school gap for youth
ANR responds to Hispanic teenage pregnancy
Elderly population will increase dramatically
UC must take lead in curricula reform, teacher training