University of California

Welfare reform shines a light on work-force development challenges


David Campbell

Author Affiliations

D. Campbell is Director, California Communities Program, Department of Human and Community Development, UC Davis.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 54(1):35-40. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n01p35. January 2000.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


In August 1996, Congress passed sweeping reforms to the nation's welfare system, requiring most recipients to work and placing a 5-year limit on benefits. The California Communities Program at UC Davis has been studying the progress of welfare reform in six California counties, and comparing the state's experience to national trends. Through more than 200 interviews and an extensive literature review, we have found that welfare reform is succeeding in reducing caseloads and reinventing local social-service bureaucracies. But these changes must be joined with long-term job creation and work-force development strategies if they are to truly reduce poverty. California's welfare reform policies and experiences highlight the particular challenges facing rural counties, which generally have fewer staff resources, a less-developed infrastructure of nonprofit service organizations, and lower expectations about their ability to implement major reforms.


Fix M, Zimmerman W. All under one roof: Mixed status families in an era of reform. 1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. 21p.

Garkovich L, Irby J. Where the rubber meets the road: New governance issues in America's rural communities. Southern Rural Development Center: The Rural Community Consortium, Mississippi State University 1998. p.8.

Loprest P. Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing?. 1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. 27p.

Martin P. Welfare reform in rural California: Issues and challenges. California Community Topics, No 5. 1999. UC Davis: California Communities Program. 4p.

Nathan RP, Gais TL. A surprising first look: Implementing the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996. American Society for Public Administration: PA Times. 1999. 22(6):1-2.

RAND Statewide CalWORKs Evaluation. Welfare reform in California: State and county implementation of CalWORKs in the First Year. Santa Monica: RAND 1999. p.87.

Rural Policy Research Institute. Rural America and welfare reform: An overview assessment. Rural Welfare Reform Panel, University of Missouri 1999. p.35.

Campbell D. 2000. Welfare reform shines a light on work-force development challenges. Hilgardia 54(1):35-40. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n01p35
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu