Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
Delicious
LinkedIn
StumbleUpon
Alternative systems aim to reduce inputs, maintain profits
Authors
Peter LivingstonKaren Klonsky
Authors Affiliations
P. Livingston is Staff Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics, UC Davis; K. Klonsky is Extension Specialist is Staff Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics, UC Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 48(5):34-42. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n05p34. September 1994.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
The economic component of the Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) project at UC Davis compared the financial performance of low-input and organic farming systems to conventional systems. All of the systems have been profitable over the first 4 years of the project. However, nei- ther the organic nor lo w-input systems have been able to show equivalent profits to either of the conventional systems on a whole farm basis without organic price premiums.
Livingston P, Klonsky K. 1994. Alternative systems aim to reduce inputs, maintain profits. Hilgardia 48(5):34-42. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n05p34
Also in this issue:
Effect of heterozygosity at the double-muscle locus on the performance of market calvesCan ‘sustainable’ be defined? New directions in research needed
Farming in transition – Editor's note
Farming in transition: News Briefs
Farming in transition Overview: Society pressures farmers to adopt more sustainable systems
Sidebar: CSAs: the consumer-farmer connection
Farming in transition: Analysis – Scientists and farmers try new approach to research
Conventional, low-input and organic farming systems compared
Transition from conventional to low-input agriculture changes soil fertility and biology
In low-input and organic systems: Researchers find short-term insect problems, long-term weed problems
Selecting the right cover crop gives multiple benefits