Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
Delicious
LinkedIn
StumbleUpon
Citizens, experts differ: What is “acceptable” risk?
Authors
Arthur L. CraigmillJames M. Meyers
Authors Affiliations
A.L. Craigmill is Extension Environmental Toxicologist, UC Davis; J. M. Meyers is Extension Environmental Health Specialist, School of Public Health, UC Berkeley.Publication Information
Hilgardia 48(1):5-6. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n01p5. January 1994.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Environmental Health Specialist James Meyers and Environmental Toxicologist Arthur Craigmill examine the public's perception of food safety.
Craigmill A, Meyers J. 1994. Citizens, experts differ: What is “acceptable” risk?. Hilgardia 48(1):5-6. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n01p5
Also in this issue:
Phosphorus removal from wastewater applied to landEnsuring food safety requires national effort
One in three suffers foodborne illness annually. Safeguarding food quality: a national priority
One size does not fit all: Some thoughts on pesticides in the diets of infants and children
Sidebar: Children are not “little adults” — NAS report
Emerging health concerns about pesticide residues
Sidebar: Pesticide regulation primer
Lawmakers should recognize uncertainties in risk assessment
Sidebar: Risk assessment defined
Sidebar: How does cancer begin? A brief description of the multistage model of cancer
Sidebar: Debate simmers: Should carcinogens be tested at maximum tolerated dose?
Pest management alternatives needed: Delaney Clause ruling may trigger pesticide cancellations
Based on recent developments, public health, agriculture can forge new partnerskips