Sidebar: Debate simmers: Should carcinogens be tested at maximum tolerated dose?
Author AffiliationsG. Charnley is Toxicologist and Senior Staff Scientist for the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences.
Hilgardia 48(1):28-28. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n01p28. January 1994.
Charnley G. 1994. Sidebar: Debate simmers: Should carcinogens be tested at maximum tolerated dose?. Hilgardia 48(1):28-28. DOI:10.3733/ca.v048n01p28
Also in this issue:Phosphorus removal from wastewater applied to land
Ensuring food safety requires national effort
Citizens, experts differ: What is “acceptable” risk?
One in three suffers foodborne illness annually. Safeguarding food quality: a national priority
One size does not fit all: Some thoughts on pesticides in the diets of infants and children
Sidebar: Children are not “little adults” — NAS report
Emerging health concerns about pesticide residues
Sidebar: Pesticide regulation primer
Lawmakers should recognize uncertainties in risk assessment
Sidebar: Risk assessment defined
Sidebar: How does cancer begin? A brief description of the multistage model of cancer
Pest management alternatives needed: Delaney Clause ruling may trigger pesticide cancellations
Based on recent developments, public health, agriculture can forge new partnerskips