Effects of plant size on mechanical clipping of pickling cucumbers
Authors
W. L. SimsB. L. Gledhill
Authors Affiliations
William L. Sims is Extension Vegetable Crops Specialist, University of California, Davis; Brent L. Gledhill is Extension Laboratory Technician, University of California, Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 22(9):4-5. DOI:10.3733/ca.v022n09p4. September 1968.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Previous studies of mechanical clipping, or topping of canning tomato plants grown for mechanical harvesting showed that this technique could be used satisfactorily to spread harvest dates and obtain plant uniformity. Since a onceover or single harvest method is also being used in the mechanical harvesting of pickling cucumbers, the purpose of these tests was to determine whether a similar delayed-maturity effect might occur that would aid growers in scheduling cucumber plantings for mechanical harvesting. Field trials were conducted at Davis during a three-year period (1966-68) and in the greenhouse during the winter of 1967. The monoecious pickling cucumber variety SMR-58 was used in all experiments. In addition to the SMR-58 variety, the gynoecious hybrid Piccadilly was used in the 1967 and 1968 field tests and in the greenhouse study. The field plot work of 1967 with the variety SMR-58 represents the results of these findings and is reported here. The plots were seeded May 29 in double rows on 40-inch beds. Germination was on June 3 and plants were thinned June 8 leaving three plants per clump, 6 inches apart.
Also in this issue:
Effects of air pollutants on lemons and navel orangesBoron leaching
Plant variations in asparagus lines
Air pollution and agriculture today
Morphactins induce berry abscission in grapes
Planting depth critical for short-statured wheat varieties
New sugar beet varieties reduce losses from virus yellows
Factors affecting the aseptic culture of Lovell peach seedlings