Nutritive value of sheep diets on coastal California annual range

Rosiere, R; Torell, D

Nutritive value of sheep diets on coastal California annual range

Authors

R. E. Rosiere
D. T. Torell

Authors Affiliations

R. E. Rosiere was formerly assistant range animal nutritionist, Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley, and is presently assistant professor of range science/management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas 76402; D. T. Torell was formerly livestock specialist/lecturer, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, and is presently a livestock consultant in Ukiah.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 53(1):1-19. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v53n01p019. January 1985.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Diets of sheep on California annual range in the northern Coast Mountains were evaluated at various seasons and stages of plant growth on grass-woodland and improved grassland grazed yearlong at three grazing intensities. Nutritive content of forage samples collected by esophageal-fistulated ewes, including organic matter digestibility, digestible energy, crude protein, ether extract, fiber constituents and minerals, was compared with nutritive content of herbage from both range (vegetative cover) types and with nutrient requirements of sheep. Diets from grassland improved by seeding to subterranean clover were more digestible and had more crude protein and digestible energy than diets from woodland range. There were differences in contents of various nutrients among seasons and phenological stages (e.g., more protein and energy in fall and winter than in summer) but not among grazing intensities. Based on nutrient concentrations, diets were generally adequate for brood ewes except at plant maturity on woodland range when protein and energy could be deficient. Grazing selectivity occurred for some nutrients but not consistently. Associations among nutritional variables suggested that acid detergent fiber was a good indicator of forage nutritional value. Acid detergent lignin and cellulose were the best predictive variables for organic matter digestibility.

Literature Cited

Allison C. D., Kothmann M. M. Effect of level of stocking pressure on forage intake and diet quality of range cattle. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 1979. 30:174-78.

Aoac . Official methods of analysis. 1965. 10th ed. Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.

Arnold G. W., Morley F. H. W. Grazing behavior. Grazing Animals. 1981. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co World Anim. Sci. Bl. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90137-7 [CrossRef]

Arnold G. W., Ball J., McManus W. R., Bush I. G. Studies on the diet of the grazing animal. I. Seasonal changes in the diet of sheep grazing on pastures of different availability and composition. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 1966. 17:543-56. DOI: 10.1071/AR9660543 [CrossRef]

Aschmann H., di Castri F., Mooney H. A. Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems. Mediterranean Type Ecosystems: Origins and Structure. 1973. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-65520-3_2 [CrossRef]

Coleman S. W., Barth K. M. Quality of diets selected by grazing animals and its relation to quality of available forage and species composition of pastures. J. Anim. Sci. 1973. 36:754-61.

Cook C. W., Taylor K., Harris L. E. The effect of range condition and intensity of grazing upon daily intake and nutritive value of the diet on desert ranges. J. Range Manage. 1962. 15:1-6. DOI: 10.2307/3894799 [CrossRef]

Edlefsen J. L., Cook C. W., Blake J. T. Nutrient content of the diet as determined by hand plucked and esophageal fistula samples. J. Anim. Sci. 1960. 19:560

Evans R. A., Love R. M. The step-point method of sampling—a practical tool in range research. J. Range Manage. 1957. 10:208-12.

Goering H. K., Van Soest P. J. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agr. Handbook No. 379. 1975. Washington, D.C.: USDA, Agr. Res. Service.

Gordon A., Sampson A. W. Composition of common California foothill plants as a factor in range management. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 1939. p.627. https://archive.org/details/compositionofcom627gord DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.59156 [CrossRef]

Hardison W. A., Reid J. T., Martin C. M., Woolfolk P. G. Degree of herbage selection by grazing cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1954. 37:89-102. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91236-9 [CrossRef]

Hart R. H., Abdalla O. M., Clark D. H., Marshall M. B., Hamid M. H., Hager J. A., Waggoner J. W. Jr. Quality of forage and cattle diets on the Wyoming High Plains. J. Range Manage. 1983. 36:46-51. DOI: 10.2307/3897980 [CrossRef]

Holechek J. L., Vavra M., Pieper R. D. Methods for determining the nutritive quality of range ruminant diets: a review. J. Anim. Sci. 1982. 54:363-76.

Jefferies N. W., Rice R. W. Nutritive value of clipped and grazed range forage samples. J. Range Manage. 1969. 22:192-95. DOI: 10.2307/3896340 [CrossRef]

Langlands J. P., Bennett I. L. Stocking intensity and pastoral production: II. Herbage intake of Merino sheep grazed at different stocking rates. J. Agr. Res. 1973. 81:205-09. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600058846 [CrossRef]

Leigh J. H., Wilson A. D., Mulham W. E. A study of Merino sheep grazing a cotton-bush (Kochia aphylla) — grassland (Stipa variabilis — Danthonia caespitosa) community on the Riverine Plain. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 1968. 19:947-61.

Lesperance A. L., Clanton D. C., Nelson A. B., Theurer C. B. Factors affecting the apparent chemical composition of fistula samples. West. Regional Coordinating Comm. No. 8 1974. Nevada Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. T18

Lesperance A. L., Jensen E. H., Bohman V. R., Madsen R. A. Measuring selective grazing with fistulated steers. J. Dairy Sci. 1960. 43:1615-21. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(60)90380-5 [CrossRef]

Lewis S. R., Lesperance A. L., Speth C. F., Brown D. E. The effect of grazing intensity on forage selectivity of cattle on Great Basin wildrye plant communities. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 1982. 33:272-75.

McGregor R. A., Tucker G. N. Jr. California livestock statistics. 1981. Sacramento: California Crop and Livestock Reporting Service.

Munz P. A., Keck D. D. A California Flora and Supplement. 1973. Berkeley: University of California Press.

NAS. Atlas of Nutritional Data on United States and Canadian Feeds. 1971. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, No. 5. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 1975. 5th revised ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.

Parr Instrument Company. Instructions for the 1241 Adiabatic Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter. Manual No. 160. 1981. Moline, IL: Parr Instrument Co.

Pieper R., Cook C. W., Harris L. E. Effect of intensity of grazing upon nutritive content of the diet. J. Anim. Sci. 1959. 18:1031-37.

Pitt M.D., Heady H. F. The effects of grazing intensity on annual vegetation. J. Range Manage. 1979. 32:109-14. DOI: 10.2307/3897553 [CrossRef]

Rittenhouse L. R., Streeter C. L., Clanton D. C. Estimating digestible energy from dry and organic matter in diets of grazing cattle. J. Range Manage. 1971. 24:73-75. DOI: 10.2307/3896072 [CrossRef]

Rosiere R. E., Torell D. T. Influence of stocking rate on performance of ewes and lambs grazing naturalized and improved California annual range. Proc., West. Sec., Amer. Soc Anim. Sci. 1982. 33:280-83.

Rosiere R. E., Wallace J. D., Beck R. F. Cattle diets on semi-desert grassland: nutritive content. J. Range Manage. 1975. 28:94-96.

Sas . SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 1982. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc. Box 8000, Cary, NC 27511

Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Agr. Handbook No. 436. 1975. Washington, D.C.: USDA, Soil Conservation Service.

Steel R. G. D., Torrie J. H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 1960. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Tilley J. M. A., Terry R. A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. British Grassl. Soc. 1963. 18:104-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x [CrossRef]

University of California. 1980 and 1981. Hopland Field Station annual report. Hopland, CA 95449

Van Dyne G. M. Chemical composition and digestibility of plants from annual range and from pure-stand plots. J. Range Manage. 1965. 18:332-37.

Van Dyne G. M., Brockington N. R., Szocs Z., Duek D., Ribic C. A., Breymeyer A. I., Van Dyne G. M. Large herbivore subsystem. Grasslands, Systems Analysis and Man, International Biological Programme 19. 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dyne G. M., Heady H. F. Dietary chemical composition of cattle and sheep grazing in common on a dry annual range. J. Range Manage. 1965. 18:78-86.

Van Dyne G. M., Lofgreen G. P. Comparative digestion of dry annual range forage by cattle and sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1964. 23:823-32.

Van Dyne G. M., Torell D. T. Development and use of the esophageal fistula: a review. J. Range Manage. 1964. 17:7-19.

Van Dyne G. M., Weir W. C. Variations among cattle and sheep in digestive power measured by microdigestion techniques. J. Anim. Sci. 1964. 23:1116-23.

Van Soest P. J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 1982. Corvallis, OR: O&;B Books, Inc.

Varian Techtron. Analytical Methods for Flame Spectroscopy. 1972. Melbourne, Australia: Varian Techtron Property, Ltd.

Vavra M., Rice R. W., Bement R. E. Chemical composition of the diet, intake and gain of yearling cattle on different grazing intensities. J. Anim. Sci. 1973. 36:411-14.

Wallace J. D., Hyder D. N., Van Dyne G. M. Salivary contamination of forage selected by esophageal fistulated steers grazing sandhill grassland. J. Range Manage. 1972. 25:184-87. DOI: 10.2307/3897052 [CrossRef]

Weir W. C., Torell D. T. Selective grazing by sheep as shown by a comparison of the chemical composition of range and pasture forage obtained by hand clipping and that collected by esophageal-fistulated sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1959. 18:641-49.

Wilson A. D., Leigh J. H., Mulham W. E. A study of Merino sheep grazing a bladder saltbush (Atriplex vesicaria-cotton-bush (Kochia aphylla) community on the Riverine Plain. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 1969. 20:1123-36.

Also in this issue:

Strategic planning enters new phase

Science Briefs

New aphids infest lettuce

Vine mealybug threatens grapes

Safety award winners describe best practices

UC shores up research for CALFED: How do you slice the water pie?

Q & A: Devising a water strategy for the 21st century

Saline water can be reused to irrigate sugarbeets, but sugar may be low

Shot hole encourages almond drop, doesn't harm kernels

Contaminants and injury induce inking on peaches and nectarines

Farmers adopt new irrigation and fertilizer techniques: Changes could help growers maintain yields, protect water quality

Food preparation practices influence nutrition

Farmworkers positive about their jobs, but suggest improvements

Desert heat degrades quality of stored alfalfa hay