Effects of infection with Rhynchosporium secalis on some components of growth and yield in two barley cultivars
Authors
M.A. JacksonR.K. Webster
Authors Affiliations
M.A. Jackson was Postgraduate Research Plant Pathologist in the Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis; R.K. Webster was Professor of Plant Pathology and Plant Pathologist in the Experiment Station, Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 49(4):1-14. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v49n04p014. April 1981.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Two cultivars of barley, Numar and Briggs, differing in their susceptibility to Rhynchosporium secalis, but without any known vertical genes for disease resistance, were grown in replicate plots and either inoculated with race 74 of R. secalis or sprayed with Benlate for disease control. Measurements included height, numbers of various plant parts, leaf area, dry weight of plant parts, yield components and grain yield. Analysis of the data indicated the more resistant variety Briggs, outyielded the susceptible variety Numar, and differed in other growth components. Calculation of leaf life span indicated this was a key difference between varieties with respect to disease resistance. Further testing on the relationship between leaf life span and disease resistance is necessary, but measurement of leaf life span may be a useful tool in screening breeding material for a background level of horizontal resistance, as well as leading to better understanding of a mechanism of disease resistance.
Literature Cited
Ali S.M., Mayfield A.H., Clare B.G. Pathogenicity of 203 isolates of Rhynchosporium secalis on 21 barley cultivars. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1976. 9:135-43.
Brooks D.H. Observations on the effects of mildew, Erysiphe graminis on growth of spring and winter barley. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1972. 70:149-56.
Davidson B.L. Some effects of leaf area control on the yield of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1965. 16:721-31. DOI: 10.1071/AR9650721 [CrossRef]
Dyck P.L., Schaller C.W. Inheritance of resistance in barley to several physiologic races of the scald fungus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 1961. 3:153-164.
Evans L.T., Wardlaw I.F. Aspects of the comparative physiology of grain yield in cereals. Adv. Agron. 1976. 28:301-59. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60558-1 [CrossRef]
Gallagher J.N., Biscoe P.V., Scott R.K. Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. J. Appl. Ecol. 1975. 12:319-36. DOI: 10.2307/2401735 [CrossRef]
Jackson L.F., Webster R.K. The dynamics of a controlled population of Rhynchosporium secalis, changes in race composition and frequencies. Phytopathology. 1976a. 66:726-28.
Jackson L.F., Webster R.K. Race differentiation, distribution, and frequency of Rhynchosporium secalis in California. Phytopathology. 1976b. 66:719-25.
Jenkins J.E.E., Melville S.C., Jemmett J.L. The effect of fungicides on leaf diseases and on yield in spring barley in southwest England. Plant Path. 1972. 21:49-58.
Large E.C. Growth stages in cereals (illustration of the Feckes scale). Plant Path. 1954. 3:128-29.
Milthorpe F.L., Ivins J.D. The growth of cereals and grasses: Proc. of the 12th Easter School in Agricultural Science. 1965. Butterworths, London: University of Nottingham. 359p.
Moseman J.G. Scald (summary) 1971. Proc. 2nd Int. Barley Gen. Symp. Pullman Wash, 536-38
Rawson H.M., Evans L.T. The contribution of stem reserves to grain development in a range of wheat cultivars of different height. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1971. 22:851-63. DOI: 10.1071/AR9710851 [CrossRef]
Saghir A.R., Khan A.R., Worzella W.W. Effects of plant parts on the grain yield, kernel weight, and plant height of wheat and barley. Agron. J. 1968. 60:95-97.
Schaller C.W. The effect of mildew and scald infection on yield and quality of barley. Agron. J. 1951. 43:183-88.
Schein R.D. Pathogenic specialization in Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology. 1958. 48:477-80.
Simpson G.M. Association between grain yield per plant and photosynthetic area above the flag-leaf node in wheat. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 1968. 48:253-60. DOI: 10.4141/cjps68-046 [CrossRef]
Ulrich A. The influence of antecedent climates upon the subsequent growth and development of the sugar beet plant. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Technologists. 1956. 9:97-109. DOI: 10.5274/jsbr.9.2.97 [CrossRef]
Webster R.K., Jackson L.F., Schaller C.W. Sources of resistance in barley to Rhynchosporium secalis. Plant Disease. 1980. 64:88-90. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-915X(97)80044-4 [CrossRef]
Willey R.W., Holliday R. Plant population and shading studies in barley. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 1971. 77:445-52. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600064510 [CrossRef]
Van der Plank J.E. Plant disease, epidemics, and control. 1963. N.Y: Academic Press. 349p. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-196410000-00018 [CrossRef]
Van der Plank J.E. Principles of plant infection. 1975. N.Y: Academic Press. 216p.
Also in this issue:
ReflectionsMedfly problem simmers
If medfly infestation triggered a trade ban: Embargo on California produce would cause revenue, job loss
Excess nitrogen raises nectarine susceptibility to disease and insects
Drip irrigation controls soil salinity under row crops
Hedgerows use more water, but increase efficiency, profit in young walnuts
Nutrition videotapes reach low-income WIC audiences
Electrostatic sprayers improve pesticide efficacy in greenhouses
Parasitoid shows potential for biocontrol of eugenia psyllid