University of California

Soil macrostructure as affected by cultural treatments


Ralph C. Cole

Author Affiliations

Ralph C. Cole was Instructor in Soil Technology and Junior Soil Technologist in the Experiment Station.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 12(6):427-472. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v12n06p427. March 1939.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


Abstract does not appear. First page follows.


This investigation was undertaken to find a quantitative method of expressing the structural condition of the soil, and by means of this method to study the effects of various mechanical treatments with respect to changes in structure. The effects of irrigation and of tillage operations were of particular concern. Seasonal changes were also observed.

Shaw (17)3 has defined soil structure as:

A term expressing the arrangement of individual grains and aggregates that make up the soil mass. The structure may refer to the natural arrangement of the soil when in place and undisturbed or to the soil at any degree of disturbance. The terms used indicate the character of the arrangement, the size and shape of the aggregates, and in some cases may indicate the consistence of those aggregates.

As thus defined, the term “soil structure” is obviously descriptive, and as such is not capable of being expressed by any specific measurement or number.

Many measurements of the physical properties of soils, which are dependent on the structure, have been made; and any of these measurements may be considered as an index of soil structure. These measurements are made either of the macro- or microstructure. A greater amount of work has been done on the microanalysis, which has been mainly measurements of the size distribution of particles after the soil has been slaked in water. The macroanalyses have been mainly measurements of the size distribution of coarse aggregates of soils obtained under field conditions in an undisturbed state. This present investigation is of the latter type; the method will be described in detail later. Other methods, such as the pull on the drawbar of a tillage implement, the amount of pressure required to force a sharpened instrument into the soil, and porosity measurements such as water penetration, air movement, so-called “capillary and noncapillary” pore space, and measurements of volume weight, have been used as indexes of soil-structure.

Literature Cited

[1.] Baver L. D., Rhodes H. Aggregate analysis as an aid in the study of soil structure relationships. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 1932. 24:920-29. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1932.00021962002400110009x [CrossRef]

[2.] Bouyoucos G. J. The ultimate, natural structure of soils. Soil Sci. 1929. 28:27-37. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192907000-00003 [CrossRef]

[3.] Bouyoucos G. J. A new method of measuring the comparative rate of percolation of water in different soils. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 1930. 22:438-45.

[4.] Buehrer T. F. The movement of gases through the soil as a criterion of soil structure. Arizona Tech. Bul. 1932. 39:1-57. fig. 12.

[5.] Chapman J. E. The effects of organic matter on the tillage of a clay soil. Internatl. Soc. Soil Sci. Proc. 1927. 1:443-45.

[6.] Cole R. C., Edlefsen N. E. A sedimentation tube for analyzing water-stable soil aggregates. Soil Sci. 1935. 40:473-79. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193512000-00004 [CrossRef]

[7.] Culpin C. Studies on the relation between cultivation implements, soil structure and the crop. I. Some preliminary observations on the measurement of soil structure, with a description of an instrument for measurement of soil resistance. Jour. Agr. Sci. 1936. 26:22-35. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600021778 [CrossRef]

[8.] Davis C. Improvement in the soil compactometer and notes on its performance. Wye, Kent [England] South-Eastern Agr. Coll. Jour. 1931. 28:237-42.

[9.] Demolon A., Henin S. Recherches sur la structure des limons et la synthèse des agrégats. Soil Research. 1932. 3:1-9.

[10.] Edlefsen N. E., Cole R. C. A comparison of the specific gravity balance and the pipette method of determining density of soil suspensions. Soil Sci. 1936. 42:131-36. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193608000-00005 [CrossRef]

[11.] Henin S. Sur un mode d’expression caracterisant l’etat structural des sol. Trans. 1st Comm. Internatl. Soc. Soil Sci. (Soil Physics) 1934. pp.116-20.

[12.] Keen B. A. Physical properties of the soil 1931. p.380. p. (See especially P. 235-86.) Longmans Green, London.

[13.] Krause Martin. Russche Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der Bodenstruktur. Landw. Jahrb. 1931. 73:603-90.

[14.] Novak U. Contributions to the study of soil structure: I. [Summary in German.] Bul. Czecho-Slovak. Acad. Agr. 1932. 8:756-61.

[15.] Russell E. W. The interaction of clay with water and organic liquids as measured by specific volume changes and its relation to the phenomena of crumb formation in soils. Roy. Soc. of London Phil. Trans., Series A. 1934. 233:361-89. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1934.0022 [CrossRef]

[16.] Shaw C. F. Soil terminology 1926. p.28. p. (Mimeo.).

[17.] Shaw C. F. When the soil mulch conserves moisture. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 1929. 21:1165-71.

[18.] Tiulin A. T. Some questions of soil structure: II. Aggregate analysis a help method for determining the real soil structure. Reprint from “Results of investigations of Perm 1928. Agr. Exp. Sta. (U. S. S. R.), Div. of Agr. Chem. No. 2.”

[19.] Veihmeyer F. J. Some factors affecting the irrigation requirements of deciduous orchards. Hilgardia. 1927. 2(6):125-291. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v02n06p125 [CrossRef]

[20.] Vilensky D. Influence de l’humidité du sol sur sa structure. Trans. 1st Comm. Internatl. Soc. Soil Sci. (Soil Physics) 1934. pp.97-108.

Cole R. 1939. Soil macrostructure as affected by cultural treatments. Hilgardia 12(6):427-472. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v12n06p427
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu