Factors which modify the resistance of wheat to bunt, Tilletia tritici
AuthorFred N. Briggs
Author AffiliationsFred N. Briggs was Associate Pathologist, Office Cereal Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, and Associate in Agronomy, California Agricultural Experiment Station.
Hilgardia 4(7):175-184. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v04n07p175. November 1929.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
In an earlier publication(2)4 the author presented data which indicated that Martin wheat differs from such susceptible varieties of wheat as White Federation and Hard Federation in one main dominant factor for resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, and that Hussar wheat differs from these susceptible varieties in two main factors for resistance, one of which was shown to be identical with the Martin factor.
Because some susceptible plants nearly always escape infection it was necessary to classify F2 on the basis of percentages of bunt in F3 rows which were grown from the seed of individual F2 plants. Although Martin and Hussar were completely free from bunted plants, there were not enough bunt-free F3 rows to make up the resistant classes. A few rows with a low percentage of bunt had to be included in the resistant groups. At that time it was pointed out that the presence of a few diseased plants in resistant rows might be due to modifying factors. Also it was suggested that genetically resistant plants occasionally might become infected.
 Bridges C. B. Specific modifiers of eosin eye color in Drosophila melanogaster. Jour Exp. Zool. 1919. 28:337-338. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1400280302 [CrossRef]
 Briggs Fred N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Winter, in wheat. Jour. Agr. Res. 1926. 32:973-990.
 Castle W. E. The inconstancy of unit characters. American Naturalist. 1912. 46:352-362. DOI: 10.1086/279284 [CrossRef]
 Castle W. E., Philips John C. Piebald rats and selection. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 1914. 195:1-154. DOI: 10.1086/279719 [CrossRef]
 Faris James A. Factors influencing the infection of wheat by Tilletia tritici and Tritici levis. Mycologia. 1924. 16:259-282. DOI: 10.2307/3753446 [CrossRef]
 Gaines E. F. New physiologic forms of Tilletia levis and Tilletia tritici. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:579-588.
 Reed G. M. Physiologic races of bunt of wheat. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1928. 15:157-170. DOI: 10.2307/2435660 [CrossRef]
 Rodenhiser H. A. Physiologic specialization in some cereal smuts. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:995-1003.
 Tisdale W. H., et al. Relative resistance of wheats to bunt in the Pacific Coast states. U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bul. 1925. 1299:1-30.
Also in this issue:Fruits and vegetables: State in top rank because of advances in farm methods, technology, marketing, merchandising, and food science
Chemical control of brush: Field experiments in eradication of range brush by chemical treatment promising but more work needed
New fruit varieties: Produced by superior seedlings, chance hybridization or planned by selective breeding programs
Cereal breeding: Investigations show awned wheat exceeds awnless in yield, kernel weight and test weight per bushel
Brown almond mites: Overwintering eggs appear in June with three life cycles a year offering an advantage in control program
Northern California walnuts: Environmental resistance a factor in the control of codling moth populations shown in tests at Linden
Stump grafting old citrus: Familiar bark grafting practice commonl proves adaptable to old orange trees in used on walnuts San Bernardino County
Downy mildew control: New chemicals greatly reduce damage from downy mildews of leafy garden vegetables
Spread of apricot roots: Unirrigated trees apparently obtained moisture from adjacent irrigated plot in experimental orchard at Winters
California sugar beet research: Data obtained by scientists and applied by growers effectively increased production efficiency and yield