Labor costs may be reduced …
Authors
Theodore M DeJongR. Scott Johnson
James F Doyle
David Ramming
Publication Information
Hilgardia 59(2):80-83. DOI:10.3733/ca.v059n02p80. April 2005.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Production costs in peaches are highly dependent on the cost of labor to prune, thin and harvest trees—costs that would drop if growers had rootstocks that decreased tree size. Collaborating researchers from UC Davis and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Horticulture Crops Research Laboratory in Parlier screened several promising clonal, size-controlling rootstocks for California peach production. In field tests, two peach scion cultivars (‘Flavorcrest’ and ‘Loadel’) on five interspecific hybrid rootstocks yielded positive results. After 8 years in the orchard, they performed well compared with trees on ‘Nemaguard’ rootstock (the California standard for peaches), with reduced trunk circumferences (60% to 95%), reduced dormant (22% to 80%) and summer (40% to 80%) pruning weights, and acceptable fruit size and crop yields (54% to 98%), since smaller trees will be planted at higher densities. This project has identified three new dwarfing rootstocks with commercial potential for California peach production. One rootstock (‘Hiawatha’) is already available through commercial nurseries and UC and USDA have jointly licensed the two others for commercial use.
References
Basile B, Marsal J, DeJong TM. Daily shoot extension growth of peach trees growing on rootstocks that reduce scion growth is related to daily dynamics of stem water potential. Tree Physiol. 2003. 23:695-704. PubMed PMID: 12777242
Basile B, Marsal J, Solari LI, et al. Hydraulic conductance of peach trees grafted on rootstocks with differing size-controlling potentials. Hort Sci Biotech. 2003. 78:768-74.
DeJong M, Day KR, Doyle JF, et al. The KREC Perpendicular “V” (KAC-V) orchard system for peaches and nectarines. HortTech. 1994. 4:362-7.
DeJong TM, Tsuji W, Doyle HF, et al. Comparative economic efficiency of four peach production systems in California. HortSci. 1999. 34(1):73-8.
Micke W, Hewitt AA, Clark JK, et al. Pruning Fruit and Nut Trees. UC Div of Agric Sci Leaflet 21171 1980.
Rom RC, Carlson RF. Rootstocks for Fruit Crops.. 1987. New York: J Wiley. 494p.
Webster AD. Rootstocks for temperate fruit crops: Current uses, future potential and alternative strategies. Acta Hort. 2001. 557:25-34.
Weibel A, Johnson RS, DeJong TM. Comparative vegetative growth responses of two peach cultivars grown on size-controlling vs. standard rootstocks. Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2002. 128:463-71.
Also in this issue:
A Classification System for California's Hardwood RangelandsLetters: April-June 2005
Collaboration fosters Kearney scientific achievements
Agricultural innovation marks 40 years at Kearney
“Farm to palate” postharvest research ensures high-quality produce
UC nematologists battle tiny underground pests
Lygus study validates treatment thresholds
Blueberry research launches exciting new California specialty crop
The future of California raisins is drying on the vine
Orchard-system configurations increase efficiency, improve profits in peaches and nectarines
Methyl bromide alternatives … Soil solarization provides weed control for limited-resource and organic growers in warmer climates
Mulches reduce aphid-borne viruses and whiteflies in cantaloupe
Large bugs damage pistachio nuts most severely during midseason
Early harvest delays berry skin browning of ‘Princess’ table grapes
Reduced-risk fungicides help manage brown rot and other fungal diseases of stone fruit
Conventional and molecular assays aid diagnosis of crop diseases and fungicide resistance
Deep vadose zone hydrology demonstrates fate of nitrate in eastern San Joaquin Valley
Weighing lysimeters aid study of water relations in tree and vine crops
Ozone reduces crop yields and alters competition with weeds such as yellow nutsedge