Ozone reduces crop yields and alters competition with weeds such as yellow nutsedge

Grantz, D; Shrestha, A

Ozone reduces crop yields and alters competition with weeds such as yellow nutsedge

Authors

David A Grantz
Anil Shrestha

Authors Affiliations

D.A. Grantz is Director, UC Kearney Agricultural Center, and Air Pollution Effects Specialist and Plant Physiologist, Department of Botany and Plant Sciences and the Air Pollution Research Center, UC Riverside; A. Shrestha is Integrated Pest Management Weed Ecologist, UC Statewide IPM Program. Both are located at the UC Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier. We gratefully acknowledge support from the USDA National Research Initiative through award 00–35100-9181.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 59(2):137-143. DOI:10.3733/ca.v059n02p137. April 2005.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

In recent decades, air quality has improved near most cities but not in rural areas such as the San Joaquin Valley. Many studies using diverse exposure techniques have shown that ground-level ozone air pollution reduces plant growth and yield, from negligible impacts in some species to over 30% losses in others. We studied the interaction of ozone with weed competition from yellow nutsedge in Pima cotton and tomato in open-top field-exposure chambers at the UC Kearney Research and Extension Center in Fresno County. Ozone impacts on cotton (which is relatively sensitive) were compounded by weed competition, whereas tomato (which is less sensitive) competed well at all ozone concentrations. Our data suggests that crop-loss estimates obtained in single-factor experiments accurately reflect the serious risk of ozone to agriculture, but that more accurate yield predictions will require the consideration of interactions between the components of complex crop production systems, including weed competition.

References

[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture. Resource Directory; California Agriculture: A Tradition of Innovation.. 2002. Sacramento, CA:

[CDPR] California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Annual Statewide Pesticide Use Report. 2002. www.cdpr.ca.gov

Evans PA, Ashmore MR. The effects of ambient air on a semi-natural grassland community. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1992. 38:91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(92)90170-G

Fuhrer J. Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO₂, ozone and global climate change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003. 97:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00125-7

Fuhrer J, Booker F. Ecological issues of ozone: Agricultural issues. Environ Intl. 2003. 29:141-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00157-5

Grantz DA. Ozone impacts on cotton: Towards an integrated mechanism. Environ Pollut. 2003. 126:331-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00246-X PubMed PMID: 12963294

Heagle AS, Kress LW, Temple PJ, Heck WW, Taylor OC, Tingey DT. Factors influencing ozone dose-yield response relationships in open-top field chamber studies. Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants: Proceedings of an International Conference; October 1987, Raleigh, NC. 1988. New York: Elsevier Appl Sci. p. 141-79.

Heck WW, Furiness CS. The effects of ozone on ecological systems: Time for a full assessment. Environ Mgr. 2001. Oct15-24.

Karenlampi L, Skarby L. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: Testing and finalizing the concepts. UN-ECE Workshop Report. Univ Kuopio, Dept Ecol Environ Sci. Kupio, Finland 1996.

Kim HJ, Helfand GE, Howitt RE. An economic analysis of ozone control in California's San Joaquin Valley. J Agric Resource Econ. 1998. 23:55-70.

Legge AH, Grunhage L, Nosal M, et al. Ambient ozone and adverse crop response: An evaluation of North American and European data as they relate to exposure indices and critical levels. Angew Bot. 1995. 69:192-205.

Manning WJ, Krupa SV, Lefohn AS. Experimental methodology for studying the effects of ozone on crops and trees. Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation.. 1992. Chelsea, MI: Lewis. p. 93-156.

Murphy JJ, Deluki MA, McCubbin DR, et al. The cost of crop damage caused by ozone air pollution from motor vehicles. J Environ Mgmt. 1999. 55:273-89. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0256

Mutters R, Soret S. Statewide potential crop losses from ozone exposure. Final Report to California Air Resources Board on Contract 94–345 1998. www.arb.ca.gov/rd/rd.htm.

Olszyk DM, Bytnerowicz A, Kats G, et al. Crop effects from air pollutants in air exclusion systems vs. field chambers. J Environ Qual. 1986. 15:417-22.

Olszyk D, Bytnerowicz A, Kats G, et al. Cotton yield losses and ambient ozone concentrations in California's San Joaquin Valley. J Environ Qual. 1993. 22:602-11.

Santos BM, Bewick TA, Stall WM, et al. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp.). Weed Sci. 1997. 45:229-33.

Spash CL. Assessing the economic benefits to agriculture from air pollution control. J Econ Surv. 1997. 11:47-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00023

Temple PJ, Surano KA, Mutters RG, et al. Air pollution causes moderate damage to tomatoes. Cal Ag. 1985. 39(3–4):20-2.

Temple PJ, Taylor OC, Benoit LF. Cotton yield responses to ozone as mediated by soil moisture and evapotranspiration. J Environ Qual. 1985. 14:1-

Varshney CK, Rout C. Ethylene diurea (EDU) protection against ozone injury in tomato plants at Delhi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998. 61:188-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001289900747 PubMed PMID: 9702375

Also in this issue:

A Classification System for California's Hardwood Rangelands

Letters: April-June 2005

Collaboration fosters Kearney scientific achievements

Agricultural innovation marks 40 years at Kearney

“Farm to palate” postharvest research ensures high-quality produce

UC nematologists battle tiny underground pests

Lygus study validates treatment thresholds

Blueberry research launches exciting new California specialty crop

The future of California raisins is drying on the vine

Orchard-system configurations increase efficiency, improve profits in peaches and nectarines

Labor costs may be reduced …

Methyl bromide alternatives … Soil solarization provides weed control for limited-resource and organic growers in warmer climates

Mulches reduce aphid-borne viruses and whiteflies in cantaloupe

Large bugs damage pistachio nuts most severely during midseason

Early harvest delays berry skin browning of ‘Princess’ table grapes

Reduced-risk fungicides help manage brown rot and other fungal diseases of stone fruit

Conventional and molecular assays aid diagnosis of crop diseases and fungicide resistance

Deep vadose zone hydrology demonstrates fate of nitrate in eastern San Joaquin Valley

Weighing lysimeters aid study of water relations in tree and vine crops