Contract use widespread in wine grape industry
Authors
Rachael E. GoodhueDale M. Heien
Hyunok Lee
Daniel A. Sumner
Authors Affiliations
R.E. Goodhue is Assistant Professor; D.M. Heien is Professor; H. Lee is Research Economist; D.A. Sumner is Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis. Sumner is also Director, UC Agricultural Issues Center. Goodhue, Heien and Sumner are members of the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. The authors thank Rich Sexton for his useful comments, and the grape growers who participated in the survey for the information they provided.Publication Information
Hilgardia 56(3):97-102. DOI:10.3733/ca.v056n03p97. May 2002.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
The use of agricultural contracts between farmers and processors or other buyers has increased substantially in recent years. Roughly half of all U.S. fruit and vegetable production is under contract. Contract usage varies widely across agricultural products. For example, 95% of poultry is raised under contract while only 13% of corn is. The wine grape industry utilizes contracts, yet little is known about the extent of contract use, or the use of specific terms and objectives. We used a survey to analyze contract use among wine grape producers, determine which users are utilizing contracts, and identify how they differ from nonusers. Ninety percent of the growers who responded to the survey have contracts, the majority of which were multiyear, averaging 3.7 years. Growers with more experience, larger vineyards, more expensive grapes and longer relationships with the buyer were more likely to enter into contracts.
References
Barkema A., Schertz LP, Daft LM. New roles and alliances in the U.S. food system. Food and Agricultural Markets: The Quiet Revolution. 1994. Washington, DC: National Planning Association. p. 96-117.
Barkema A, Drabenstott M., Cook M, Padberg Dl. The industrialization of the U.S. food system. Food and Agricultural Marketing Issues for the 21st Century. 1993. Texas A&M U, College Station: Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium 93–1. p. 3-20.
Barry P. Industrialization of U.S. agriculture: Policy, research and education needs. Ag Resource Econ Rev. 1995. 24(1):128-35.
Boehlje M. The ‘New’ Agriculture. Choices 1995. pp.34-5.
Boehlje M. Industrialization of agriculture. What are the implications? Choices 1996. pp.30-3.
Boehlje M, Schrader L., Royer J, Rogers R. The industrialization of agriculture: Questions of coordination. The industrialization of Agriculture: Vertical Coordination in the U.S. Food System. 1998. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate. p. 3-26.
[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture. Final Grape Crush Report, 1998 Crop. 1999. Sacramento, CA:
Drabenstott M. Industrialization. Steady current or tidal wave? Choices 1994. pp.4-8.
Drabenstott M. Agricultural industrialization: Implications for economic development and public policy. J Ag Applied Econ. 1995. 27(1):13-20.
Goodhue RE. Agricultural complementarities and coordination: modeling value differentiation and production contracting. UC Berkeley Dept of Agricultural and Resource Economics Ph.D. dissertation 1997.
Goodhue RE. Input controi in agricultural production contracts. Am J Ag Econ. 1999. 81(3):616-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244023
Goodhue RE, Heien DM, Lee H. Contract Use in the California Winegrape Economy. UC Agricultural Issues Center, Issues Brief 11 1999. p.4. http://aic.ucdavis.edu/oa/briefs/html
Heien DM. California Winegrape Production. Agricultural and Resource Economics Update 2(4). 1999. www.agecon.ucdavis.edu/outreadh/areupdate.htm
Knoeber CR, Thurman WN. Testing the theory of tournaments. An empirical analysis of broiler production. 1994. (April)12J Labor Econ. p. 155-79.
Sumner DA, Bombrun H, Alston JM, Heien DM, Andeson K. An economic survey of the wine and winegrape industry in the United States and Canada. UC Agricultural Issues Center Proceedings of Wine Industry Confeence October 2001. Adelaide, Australia. In press.
Urban T. Agricultural industrialization. It's inevitable Choices 1991. pp.4-6.
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture. Contracting in agriculture: An overview of the issues. Economic Research Service 2000. www.ers.usda.gov/whatsnew/issues/contracting/
Also in this issue:
Two-Dimensional Spectral Analysis of Soil Surface TemperatureWater will drive California response to climate change
Trade Center air laden with very fine particles, DELTA scientists find
Carbon dioxide hampers nitrate incorporation by plants
Super-sensitive nitrogen dioxide detector identifies greenhouse gases
World grapples with climate change
Global climate change will affect: air, water in California
Avocado thrips: New challenge for growers
Graft-transmissible agent causes bark necrosis and stem pitting in plum trees