University of California

Targeting alphas can make coyote control more effective and socially acceptable


Michael M. Jaeger
Karen M. Blejwas
Benjamin N. Sacks
Jennifer C. C. Neale
Mary M. Conner
Dale R. McCullough

Authors Affiliations

M.M. Jaeger is Project Leader, USDA Wildlife Services/National Wildlife Research Center, stationed at UC Berkeley; K.M. Blejwas is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management (ESPM), UC Berkeley; B.N. Sacks is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Nematology, UC Davis; J.C.C. Neale is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Toxicology, UC Davis; M.M. Conner is Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University; D.R. McCullough is Professor of Wildlife Biology and holds the A. Starker Leopold Endowed Chair, ESPM, UC Berkeley.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 55(6):32-37. DOI:10.3733/ca.v055n06p32. November 2001.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


Research at the UC Hopland Research and Extension Center (HREC) has improved our understanding of how to reduce sheep depredation while minimizing the impact on coyotes. Analysis of a 14-year data set of HREC coyote-control efforts found that sheep depredation losses were not correlated with the number of coyotes removed in any of three time scales analyzed (yearly, seasonally and monthly) during corresponding intervals for the next 2 years. Field research using radiotelemetry to track coyotes supported and explained this finding. For example, in 1995, dominant “alphas” from four territories were associated with 89% of 74 coyote-killed lambs; “betas” and transients were not associated with any of these kills. Relatively few coyotes were killing sheep, and these animals were difficult to capture by conventional methods at the time of year when depredation was highest. However, selective removal of only the problem alpha coyotes effectively reduced losses at HREC.


Blejwas KM, Sacks BN, Jaeger MM, McCullough DR. The effectiveness of selective removal of breeding coyotes in reducing sheep predation. J Wildlife Manage In press

Brand DJ, Fairall N, Scott WM. The influence of regular removal of black-backed jackals on the efficiency of coyote getters. S Afr J Wildlife Res. 1995. 25(1):44-8.

Conner MM, Jaeger MM, Weller TJ, McCullough DR. Impact of coyote removal on sheep depredation in Northern California. J Wildlife Manage. 1998. 62(2):690-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802345

Connolly GE. Livestock protection collars in the United States, 1988–1993. Proc Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop. 1993. 11:25-33.

Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM. Coyote depredation control: An interface between biology and management. J Range Manage. 1999. 52(5):398-412. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003765

Neale JCC, Sacks BN, Jaeger MM, McCullough DR. A comparison of bobcat and coyote predation on lambs in north-coastal California. J Wildlife Manage. 1998. 62(2):700-6. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802346

Sacks BN, Blejwas KM, Jaeger MM. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a Northern California ranch. J Wildlife Manage. 1999. 63(3):939-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802808

Sacks BN, Jaeger MM, Neale JCC, McCullough DR. Territoriality and breeding status of coyotes relative to sheep predation. J Wildlife Manage. 1999. 63(2):593-605. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802648

Sacks BN, Neale JCC. Foraging strategy of a generalist predator toward a special prey: Coyote depredation on sheep. Ecol Appl In press. 12(1):

Scrivner JH, Howard WE, Murphy AH, Hays JR. Sheep losses to predators on a California range, 1973–1983. J Range Manage. 1985. 38(5):418-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3899712

Windberg LA, Knowlton FF. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to some capture procedures. Wildlife Soc Bull. 1990. 18(3):282-90.

Jaeger M, Blejwas K, Sacks B, Neale J, Conner M, McCullough D. 2001. Targeting alphas can make coyote control more effective and socially acceptable. Hilgardia 55(6):32-37. DOI:10.3733/ca.v055n06p32
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu