Mechanical harvesting of sweet cherries: 1961 tests show promise and problems
Authors
R. A. NortonL. L. Claypool
S. J. Leonard
P. A. Adrian
R. B. Fridley
F. M. Charles
Authors Affiliations
R. A. Norton is Associate Agriculturist, Extension Service, Davis; L. L. Claypool is Professor of Pomology, U. C., Davis; S. J. Leonard is Food Technologist, U. C., Davis; P. A. Adrian is Agricultural Engineer, U. S. Department of Agriculture and Associate in Agricultural Engineering, U. C. Davis; R. B. Fridley is Assistant Professor and Assistant Agricultural Engineer, U. C. Davis; F. M. Charles is Farm Advisor, San Joaquin County.Publication Information
Hilgardia 16(5):8-10. DOI:10.3733/ca.v016n05p8. May 1962.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Tests indicate that, under good conditions, 80 to 90 per cent removal of sweet cherries is possible by mechanical shaking. However, overcoming tree injury is essential to successful commercial use of tree shaking equipment. Improved clamping devices must be developed that will eliminate or minimize tree injury. Pruning and training adjustments will be required to facilitate use of mechanical harvesting equipment in the orchard and aid in fruit removal. Results of brining tests indicate that much of the bruising observed in the fresh fruit was not visible after brining, particularly when the fruit was placed in brine immediately after harvest. Shipping any of the mechanically harvested sweet cherry crop appears impractical today.
Also in this issue:
The European common market and California AgricultureBig Club 60: —An improved and branded wheat
Foliage sprays correct iron chlorosis in grain sorghum
Avocado root rot soil survey
Sideoats grama and lovegrass: Seed production in California
Methods of estimating: Clean fleece production
Tedion: For control of European red mite on apples
Tedion: For control of European red mite on apples
Controlling molybdenum toxicity in livestock: Rust resistance in ryegrass
Bionomics and control of the nigra scale, Saissetia nigra