Environmentally related restrictions on the timber harvesting capability of a national forest: A case study
AuthorRobert J. Hrubes
Author AffiliationsRobert J. Hrubes was former Research Assistant in the Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley, has returned to his position as Forest Economist at the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California.
Hilgardia 52(1):1-37. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v52n01p037. January 1984.
In response to influences predominantly external to the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and beginning in the 1970s, the latitude and intensity of timber management activities on the National Forests have been increasingly limited through the imposition of environmentally induced constraints. Quantitative information on the relative costs and benefits of imposing environmentally induced constraints is generally lacking, and this has hindered the proper evaluation of the constraints. To generate some of this needed information, the author examined the effects of meeting environmental goals on National Forest timber harvesting capability by developing 20 simulated harvest schedules for a case study in northern California. Using available data and the simulation model FOR-PLAN, the schedules were designed to identify the effects of land withdrawal, retention of old-growth stands, minimum rotation, geographic dispersion, and limitation on the use of herbicides on allowable timber cutting. Monitored indices included first-decade harvesting, total harvest in the first five decades, long-run sustained-yield average, species concentration, acres clearcut, and distribution of ending-age classes. In addition, these economic indices were monitored by two demand formulations (present net worth and present net benefit after 16 decades), total costs and revenues in the first decade, and cost per million cubic feet. Two different price assumptions were modeled—each representing distinctly contrasting conditions. The results suggest that the allowable harvest capability of the case-study forest was significantly reduced when measures were taken to reach environmental goals.
Berck P. The economics of timber: a renewable resource in the long run. Bell. J. Econ. 1979. 10:447-62. no. 2: DOI: 10.2307/3003346 [CrossRef]
Davis K. P. American Forest Management. 1954. New York: McGraw-Hill. 519p.
Haynes R. W., Connaughton K. P., Adams D. M. Stumpage price projections for selected western species. USDA Forest Service Research Note PNW-367. 1980. Portland, Oregon: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Haynes R. W. Projections of the demand for national forest stumpage, by region, 1980-2030 1981. p.13. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-282, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon
Hrubes R.J. The USDA Forest Service in the environmental era: institutional and programmatic change 1981. p.272. PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley
Hrubes R. J., Connaughton K. P., Sassaman R. W. Roadless area-intensive management tradeoffs on the Sierra National Forest, California 1979. p.11. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-149, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California
Johnson K. Norman. Forplan User’s Manual. 1979. Ft. Collins, Colorado: USDA Forest Service.
Johnson K. N., Scheurman H. L. Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives. Forest Science Monograph. 1977. 18:31
Mead W.J. Competition and oligopsony in the Douglas-fir lumber industry. 1966. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press. 276p.
Randall R. M., Fight R. D., Johnson K. N., Connaughton K. P., Sassaman R. W. Roadless area-intensive management tradeoffs on Pacific northwest national forests 1979. p.69. Research Paper PNW-258, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon
Row C., Fred Kaiser H., Sessions J. Discount rate for long-term Forest Service investments. J. For. 1981. 79:6 vol. pp. 367-68
Usda Forest Service. Douglas-fir supply study; alternative programs for increasing timber supplies from national forest lands. 1969. Portland, Oregon: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 53p.
U.S. Water Resources Council. Obers projections. 1974. 4: vol. States. Washington, D.C
Vaux H. J., Zivnuska J. A. Forest production goals: a critical analysis. Land Economics. 1952. 18(4):318-27. DOI: 10.2307/3159480 [CrossRef]
Walker J. L. An economic model for optimizing the rate of timber harvesting 1971. p.177. PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle
Also in this issue:Times and programs change, but Division carries on tradition of public service
“City Bugs” website turns teens into taxonomists
UC trains welfare recipients
Science Briefs: Bison disease still threatens cattle
Bats can pack a punch in pest control
Bats feed on crop pests in Sacramento Valley
Media campaigns promote driver safety for farmworkers
New crop coefficients estimate water use of vegetables, row crops
Earlier irrigation cutoff for sugarbeets conserves water
Water turbulence disrupts accuracy of some flow meters
Parasitoid wasp controls blue gum psyllid
Biological control of the blue gum psyllid proves economically beneficial