Scaling of field-measured soil-water properties: II. Hydraulic conductivity and flux
AuthorsC. S. Simmons
D. R. Nielsen
J. W. Biggar
Authors AffiliationsC. S. Simmons was formerly Post Graduate Research Water Scientist, Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Davis, is Research Scientist, Geosciences Department, Battelle Northwest Labs, Richland, Washington; D. R. Nielsen was Professor of Water Science, Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Davis; J. W. Biggar was Professor of Water Science, Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Davis.
Hilgardia 47(4):103-174. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v47n04p103. September 1979.
Concepts of similar soil and scaling are applied to investigate the spatial variability of the field-measured soil-water properties, soil-water pressure head, hydraulic conductivity, and soil-water diffusivity associated with unsaturated flow. The classical, analytical aspects of scale factors as regards the invariance of the flow equations expressed in terms of “reduced variables” are reviewed and extended by considering stochastic aspects of random variations in soil-water properties. It is demonstrated that scaling can best be achieved when soil-water properties are represented by a set of related model functions.
The scale distribution is obtained from soil-water pressure head and water content measurements for soil sampling locations 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 cm below the surface in 12 plots planted to corn. Scale factors are found to have an approximate log-normal distribution.
Methods of computing scale factors directly from soil-water pressure head and hydraulic conductivity measurements and indirectly from soil-water content profiles for a drainage experiment are derived. Improved methods for estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity are also presented. Stochastic behavior of flux and cumulative seepage as random functions of the scale factors for a similar soil is described for a simple drainage experiment.
Biggar J. W., Nielsen D. R. Spatial variability of the leaching characteristics of a field soil. Water Resources Research. 1976. 12:78-84. DOI: 10.1029/WR012i001p00078 [CrossRef]
Biggar J. W., Tanji K. K., Simmons C. S., Gupta S. K., Macintyre J. L., Nielsen D. R. Theoretical and experimental observations of water and nitrate movement below a crop root zone 1977. Proceedings of National Conference: Irrigation Return Flow Management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Colorado State University
Brandt S. Statistical and computational methods in data analysis. 1976. New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Elrick D. E., Scandrett J. H., Miller E. E. Tests of capillary flow scaling. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1959. 23:329-32. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1959.03615995002300050008x [CrossRef]
Flühler H., Ardakani M. S., Stolzy L. H. Error propagation in determining hydraulic conductivity from successive water content and pressure head profiles. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1976. 40:830-36. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000060013x [CrossRef]
Freeze R. Allan. A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media. Water Resources Research. 1975. 11:725-41. DOI: 10.1029/WR011i005p00725 [CrossRef]
Haid A. Statistical theory with engineering applications. 1952. New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.
Klute A., Wilkinson G. E. Some tests of similar media concept of capillary flow: I. Reduced capillary conductivity and moisture characteristic data. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1958. 22:278-81. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200040002x [CrossRef]
Marshall T. A relation between permeability and size distribution of pores. J. of Soil Sci. 1958. 9:1-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1958.tb01892.x [CrossRef]
Miller E. E., Miller R. D. Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena. J. Appl. Phys. 1956. 27:324-32. DOI: 10.1063/1.1722370 [CrossRef]
Miller E. E., Miller R. D. Theory of capillary flow: I. Practical implications. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1955a. 19:267-71. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1955.03615995001900030005x [CrossRef]
Miller E. E., Miller R. D. Theory of capillary flow: II. Experimental information. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1955b. 19:271-75. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1955.03615995001900030006x [CrossRef]
Millington R., Quirk J. Permeability of porous media. Nature. 1959. 183:387-88. DOI: 10.1038/183387a0 [CrossRef]
Millington R., Quirk J. Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1961. 57:1200-07. DOI: 10.1039/tf9615701200 [CrossRef]
Nielsen D. R., Biggar J. W., Erh K. T. Spatial variability of field measured soil water properties. Hilgardia. 1973. 42:215-59. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v42n07p215 [CrossRef]
Peck A. J., Luxmoore R. J., Stolzy J. L. Effects of spatial variability on soil hydraulic properties in water budget modeling. Water Resources Research. 1976. 13:348-54. DOI: 10.1029/WR013i002p00348 [CrossRef]
Philip J. R. Sorption and infiltration in heterogeneous media. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1967. 5:1-10. DOI: 10.1071/SR9670001 [CrossRef]
Reichardt K., Libardi P. L., Nielsen D. R. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity determination by a scaling technique. Soil Sci. 1975. 120:165-68. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-197509000-00001 [CrossRef]
Warrick A. W., Mullen G. J., Nielsen D. R. Scaling field-measured soil hydraulic properties using a similar media concept. Water Resources Research. 1977a. 13:355-62. DOI: 10.1029/WR013i002p00355 [CrossRef]
Warrick A. W., Mullen G. J., Nielsen D. R. Predictions of soil water flux based upon field-measured soil-water properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1977b. 41:14-19. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010009x [CrossRef]
Warrick A. W. Areal predictions of soil water flux in the unsaturated zone. 1977. Proceedings of National Conference: Irrigation Return Flow Quality Management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Colorado State University.
Wilkinson G. E., Klute A. Some tests of similar media concept of capillary flow: II. Flow systems data. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1959. 23:434-37. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1959.03615995002300060021x [CrossRef]