Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
Delicious
LinkedIn
StumbleUpon
Life history studies of the cactus mealybug, Spilococcus cactearum McKenzie (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae)
Authors
Pichai ManichoteWoodrow W. Middlekauff
Authors Affiliations
Pichai Manichote was of Bangkok, Thailand, while a student at the University of California, Berkeley, performed much of the experimental work recorded in this paper and produced the original draft of its manuscript, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science; Woodrow W. Middlekauff was Professor of Entomology and Assistant Dean, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.Publication Information
Hilgardia 37(17):639-660. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v37n17p639. January 1967.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
This paper presents the first complete study of the life history, chromosomes, and general habits of the cactus mealybug, Spilococcus cactearum McKenzie. Importantly, it contains the first description of the male to be published. Taken in conjunction with Howard L. McKenzie’s original description in Hilgardia, Vol. 29, No. 15, June 1960, the present work, with its cited references, rounds out a comprehensive record of all the data available thus far. The life stages are described in detail for both sexes, covering their structures and habits. Laboratory rearing experiments in a glasshouse, from egg to adult, are fully recorded, using several constant temperatures in order to determine the optimum range for maximum survival and colonization, as well as the lethal lower and higher temperatures. Chromosome studies for this species are reported for the first time. Reproduction, sex ratio, and mating behavior are described. It was learned that parthenogenesis does not occur; fertilization by the male is essential. One natural enemy was noted: a minute, wasplike, encyrtid parasite that gave effective control. More than 100 acceptable host plants are listed, mostly cacti. The mealybug’s feeding habits are given, as are its reactions to various host species and the effects its feeding produces upon them. This insect is considered to be the most important pest of ornamental cacti. The exact place of its origin is a bit uncertain: originally reported from southeast England, it has been taken in France, Italy, California, and New Mexico. Its decided preference for xerophytes and need for moderate temperatures point to a semiarid, desert-type habitat.
Literature Cited
Beardsley J. W. A preliminary study of the males of some Hawaiian mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 1960. 17(2):199-243.
Bradley M. An aceto-carmine squash technic for mature embryo sacs. Stain Tech. 1948. 23(1):29-40.
Brown S. W., Nelson-Rees W. A. Radiation analysis of a lecanoid genetic system. Genetics. 1961. 46(8):983-1007.
Chidamian C. The book of cacti and other succulents. 1958. New York: Amer. Garden Guild. Doubleday Co., Inc. 243p.
Dodge B. O., Rickett H. W. Diseases and pests of ornamental plants. 1960. 3rd ed. New York: Ronald Press Co. 775p.
Ferris G. F. Atlas of the scale insects of North America. Series V-VI. The Pseudococcidae (Parts I-II). 1950-53. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 506p.
Ferris G. F. A brief history of the study of the Coccoidea. Microentomology. 1957. 22(2):39-57.
Giliomee J. H. Morphological and taxonomic studies on the males of three species of the genus Pseudococcus. Ann. Univ. Stellenbosch (Series A). 1961. 36(6):241-96.
Hamlin J. C. An inquiry into the stability and restriction of feeding habits of certain cactus insects Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1932. 25(1):89-120.
Hughes-Schrader S. Cytology of coccids. Adv. in Genet. 1948. 2:127-203. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60468-X [CrossRef]
Hunter W. D., Pratt F. C., Mitchell J. D. The principal cactus insects of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 1912. 113:1-71.
Ito K. Studies on the life history of the pineapple mealybug, Pseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.). Jour. Econ. Ent. 1938. 31(2):291-98.
James H. C. Sex ratios and the status of the male in Pseudococcidae. Bul. Ent. Res. 1937. 28:429-61. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485300038906 [CrossRef]
James H. C. The effect of the humidity of the environment on sex ratios from over-aged ova of Pseudococcus citri (Risso). Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London (Series A). 1938. 13(4-6):73-76.
Leese O., Leese M. Desert plants: Cacti and succulents in the wild and in cultivation. 1959. London: W. H and L. Collingridge, Ltd. 220p.
McKenzie H. L. Taxonomic study of California mealybugs, ith descriptions of new species (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Hilgardia. 1960. 29(15):681-770. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v29n15p681 [CrossRef]
James H. C. Third taxonomic study of California mealybugs, including additional species from North and South America (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Hilgardia. 1962. 32(14):637-88. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v32n14p637 [CrossRef]
Nelson-Rees W. A. Triple coitus in the mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso). Nature. 1959. 183:479 DOI: 10.1038/183479b0 [CrossRef]
Nelson-Rees W. A. A study of sex predetermination in the mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso). Jour. Exptl. Zool. 1960. 144(2):111-37. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401440203 [CrossRef]
Schrader F. The chromosomes of Pseudococcus nipae. Biol. Bul. 1921. 40(5):259-70. DOI: 10.2307/1536736 [CrossRef]
Schrader F. The sex ratio and oögenesis of Pseudococcus citri. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs und Vererbungslehre. 1923. 30:163-82.
Sutherland J. R. G. Some observations on the common mealybug, Pseudococcus citri (Risso) 1932. Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants. 23rd-24th Annual Report (1930-1932):105-18.
Uichanco L. B., Villanueva F. E. Biology of the pink mealybug of sugar cane, Trionymus sacchari (Cockerell), in the Philippines. Philippine Agr. 1932. 21(4):205-76.
Williams D. J. The British Pseudococcidae. Bul. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. 1962. 12(1):3-79.
Wilson F. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Commonwealth Agr. Bur. Tech. Comm. No. 1. 1960. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Control. p. 51-56.