The effect of developmental stage on direction of translocation of photosynthate in Vitis vinifera
AuthorsCharles R. Hale
Robert J. Weaver
Authors AffiliationsCharles R. Hale was Research Assistant in the Department of Viticulture and Enology, Davis; Robert J. Weaver was Professor of Viticulture, and Viticulturist in the Experiment Station, Davis.
Hilgardia 33(3):89-131. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v33n03p039. October 1962.
The direction of translocation of C14 following the assimilation of C14O2 by single leaves or shoot tips of the Muscat of Alexandria grapevine was determined by using radioautographic techniques. The first assimilate exported by the treated leaf was to the shoot tip. When the treated leaf was separated from the oldest importing leaf on the shoot tip by two or three other exporting leaves, the assimilate from the leaf was translocated both to the shoot tip and to the parent vine. With further shoot growth the basipetal movement predominated until translocation from a treated leaf below the shoot tip was completely reversed and was basipetal only. Translocation from leaves below the cluster was partially reversed again when fruit development started. Assimilate from these leaves was translocated both to the fruit cluster and parent vine. After the rate of shoot elongation decreased sharply, radiocarbon moved from the shoot tip in a basipetal direction.
The young inflorescence had small power as a sink compared to the shoot tip and the parent vine, and was unable to influence the direction of translocation. From 10 to 14 days before bioom until fruit set the cluster was a weak sink.
Axillary buds, tendrils, xylem, parenchyma, and pith were found normally to be weak sinks relative to the developing fruit cluster and unable to influence the longitudinal direction of translocation.
Axillary shoots behaved as young leaves until 1 or 2 of their leaves were mature. Then no assimilate moved into them from the main shoot.
Shoot tips and parent vines were more powerful sinks than the cluster during flower development but not during fruit set. Girdling and topping thus affect fruit set because they divert more assimilates into the cluster just prior to fruit set.
Arbaumont J. D’. Sur la disposition des faiseaux dans la tige, la feuille et les bourgeons de quelques plants de la famille des Ampélidées. Soc. Botan. de France Bull. 1881. 28:278-286.
Aronoff S. Translocation from soybean leaves. II. Plant Physiol. 1955. 30:184-185.
Barrier G. E., Loomis W. E. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and P32 by leaves. Plant Physiol. 1957. 32:225-231.
Biddulph O., Steward F. C. Translocation of inorganic solutes. Plant physiology: a treatise. Vol. II. 1959. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press. p. 553-603.
Biddulph O., Cory R. Demonstration of two translocation mechanisms in studies of bidirectional movement. Plant Physiol. 1960. 35:689-695. DOI: 10.1104/pp.35.5.689 [CrossRef]
Coombe B. G. Physiological aspects of fruit set and development in Vitis vinifera 1959. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of California. 105 p. (Microfilm copies may be purchased from the University of California Library Photographic Service, Berkeley.)
Coombe B. G. Relationship of growth and development to changes in sugars, auxins, and gibberellins in fruit of seeded and seedless varieties of Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. 1960. 35:241-250.
Crafts A. S. Translocation of herbicides. II. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-D by wild morning-glory. Hilgardia. 1956. 26:335-365. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v26n06p335 [CrossRef]
Crafts A. S. Translocation in plants. 1961. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 211p. DOI: 10.1104/pp.13.4.791 [CrossRef]
Esau K. Phloem structure in the grapevine and its seasonal changes. Hilgardia. 1948. 18:217-296. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v18n05p217 [CrossRef]
Esau K., Currier H. B., Cheadle V. I. Physiology of phloem. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1957. 8:349-374. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.08.060157.002025 [CrossRef]
Kursanov A. L. Translocation of organic substances in plants. Endeavour. 1961. 20:19-25.
Leonard O. A., Weaver R. J. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and Amitrole in shoots of Tokay grapes. Hilgardia. 1961. 31:327-368. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v31n09p327 [CrossRef]
Linck A. J. Studies on the distribution of phosphorus-32 in Pisum sativum, in relation to fruit development 1955. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University. (Microfilm copies may be purchased from University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.)
Loomis W. E. Translocation of carbohydrate in maize. Science. 1945. 101:398-400. DOI: 10.1126/science.101.2625.398 [CrossRef]
Negrul’ A. M., Nikiforova L. T. Some interrelations between different organs of vines. [In Russian, French summary.]. Izv. Timiryazev. seljsk. Akad. 1958. pp.73-84. No. 1
Shiroya M., Lister G. R., Nelson C. D., Krotkov G. Translocation of C14 in tobacco at different stages of development following assimilation of C14O2 by a single leaf. Canad. J. Botan. 1961. 39:855-864.
Stoev K. D., Mamarov P. T., Benchev I. B. Sugars and free amino acids during ripening and dormancy of the grape plant. Fiziol. Rastenii. 1960. 7:119-123.
Swanson C. A., Steward F. C. Translocation of organic solutes. Plant physiology, a treatise. Vol. II. 1959. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press. p. 481-551.
Swanson C. A., El Shishiny E. D. H. Translocation of sugars in the Concord grape. Plant Physiol. 1958. 33:33-37. DOI: 10.1104/pp.33.1.33 [CrossRef]
Weaver R. J., McCune S. B. Response of Thompson Seedless grapes to 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid and benzothiazol-2-oxyacetic acid. Hilgardia. 1957. 27:189-200. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v27n06p189 [CrossRef]
Weaver R. J. Effect of gibberellin on seeded Vitis vinifera and its translocation within the vine. Hilgardia. 1959a. 28:625-645. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v28n20p625 [CrossRef]
Weaver R. J. Girdling: its relation to carbohydrate nutrition and development of Thompson Seedless, Red Malaga and Ribier grapes. Hilgardia. 1959b. 28:421-456. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v28n16p421 [CrossRef]
Weaver R. J. Effect of gibberellin on seedless Vitis vinifera. Hilgardia. 1959c. 29:247-275. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v28n20p625 [CrossRef]
Winkler A. J. The effect of dormant pruning on the carbohydrate metabolism of Vitis vinifera. Hilgardia. 1929. 4:153-173. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v04n06p153 [CrossRef]
Winkler A. J. The relation of number of leaves to size and quality of table grapes. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1930. 27:158-160.
Winkler A. J. Pruning and thinning experiments with grapes. Univ. of California Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 1931. 519:56
Winkler A. J. The lateral movement of elaborated foods in the grape vine. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1932. 29:335-338.
Winkler A. J., Shemsettin E. M. Fruit bud and flower formation in the Sultanina grape. Hilgardia. 1937. 10:589-611. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v10n15p589 [CrossRef]
Winkler A. J., Williams W. O. Starch and sugars of Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. 1945. 20:412-432.
Yamaguchi S., Crafts A. S. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using C14-labeled compounds. Hilgardia. 1958. 28:161-191. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v28n06p161 [CrossRef]
Zimmerman M. H. Transport in the phloem. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1960. 11:167-190. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.11.060160.001123 [CrossRef]
Also in this issue:Publicly funded agricultural research—an anachronism or a challenge?
California grapes: The situation in 1979
Heat stress survey
Effects of fumigating crops with hydrogen sulfide or sulfur dioxide
Controlling powdery mildew in greenhouse roses
Stem lesion of Easter lilies—a complex disease
Selenium improves weight gain of beef calves