University of California

Response of clusters of Vitis vinifera grapes to 2,4-D and related compounds


Robert J. Weaver
O. A. Leonard
Stanley B. McCune

Authors Affiliations

Robert J. Weaver was Professor of Viticulture and Viticulturist in the Experiment Station, Davis; O. A. Leonard was Lecturer in Botany and Botanist in the Experiment Station, Davis; Stanley B. McCune was Laboratory Technician II in the Department of Viticulture and Enology, Davis.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 31(5):113-125. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v31n05p113. August 1961.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


Abstract does not appear. First page follows.


The herbicidal plant regulator 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and related compounds have been demonstrated to be very toxic to the grapevine even at low concentrations (Clore and Bruns, 1953); (Weaver, Winkler, and McCune, 1958).5 It is generally recognized that clusters are extremely sensitive to the compounds, especially at young stages (Weaver and Williams, 1951). However, there have been few studies where the relative sensitivity of clusters at each of several stages of development to 2,4-D have been made. This paper presents results of experiments performed in 1958 and 1959, to elucidate and add further information on response of clusters to 2,4-D and related compounds. One objective was to develop a test method whereby one could compare toxicities of various regulators on grape clusters, or could compare varietal sensitivity of clusters to the regulators.

Materials and Methods

Mature vines of Thompson Seedless (syn. Sultanina), Tokay, and Ribier in an irrigated vineyard at the University of California, Davis, were used. The seedless variety, Thompson Seedless, was pruned to four canes (Winkler, 1931), while Tokay and Ribier, seeded table grapes, were cordon-trained and spur-pruned.

Aqueous solutions of the plant growth regulators, obtained from commercial sources, were prepared by adding sufficient ammonia to dissolve the compounds. All concentrations are expressed in parts per million on an acid-equivalent basis. Hereafter, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid is referred to as

Literature Cited

Clore W. J., Bruns V. F. The sensitivity of the Concord grape to 2,4-D. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1953. 61:125-34.

Weaver R. J., McCune S. B. Test for activity of plant growth-regulators on grapes. Bot. Gaz. 1959. 120(3):166-70. DOI: 10.1086/336020 [CrossRef]

Weaver R. J., Williams W. O. Response of certain varieties of grapes to plant growth-regulators. Bot. Gaz. 1951. 113:75-85. DOI: 10.1086/335695 [CrossRef]

Weaver R. J., Winkler A. J., McCune S. B. Some effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and related compounds on the grapevine. Amer. Jour. Enol. 1958. 9(3):126-38.

Winkler A. J. Pruning and thinning experiments with grapes. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1931. 519: http://archive.org/details/pruningthinninge519wink

Weaver R, Leonard O, McCune S. 1961. Response of clusters of Vitis vinifera grapes to 2,4-D and related compounds. Hilgardia 31(5):113-125. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v31n05p113

Also in this issue:

Water for tomorrow

Water supply: Policies and planning programs

Local planning for future water supplies: Santa Barbara County case study

State policy developments in water reclamation

Wildlands and watershed management

Ground-water management

Can water pricing encourage conservation? Some principles and some problems

Saltier irrigation

Irrigation management conserves water

Cotton responses to irrigation

Irrigation management service–a new water-management tool

Drip irrigation in California

Vineyard irrigation in the Salinas Valley

Drainage problems in the San Joaquin Valley—an interagency approach

Irrigation efficiencies in the Tulare Basin

Nitrogen fertilization and water pollution

U.C. guidelines for interpretation of agricultural water quality

Monitoring salt levels in farmland drainage

Sources and fate of nitrogen in the southern San Joaquin Valley floor

Nitrate-nitrogen in the unsaturated zone below irrigated fields

Hydrobiological studies in the sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Surface irrigation return flows vary

Trace elements in wastewater

Water quality requirements for floricultural operations

Recharging and recycling ground water—the fresno experience

Irrigation trial with morro bay wastewater

Irrigating with wastewater in Sonoma County

Using food- processing wastewater for irrigation

Management of water resources in rainfed agriculture

Reducing transpiration to conserve water in soil and plants

Water use on pot chrysanthemums can be cut

Aquatic weeds and their control

Energy: Can irrigation with municipal wastewater conserve energy?

Energy for irrigation

Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu