Factors influencing the decomposition of organic soils of the California delta

Broadbent, F

Factors influencing the decomposition of organic soils of the California delta

Author

F. E. Broadbent

Author Affiliations

F. E. Broadbent was Associate Professor of Soil Microbiology and Associate Soil Microbiologist in the Experiment Station, Davis.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 29(13):587-612. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v29n13p587. February 1960.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Since the subsidence rate in the peat and muck lands of the California Delta is approximately double that reported in other areas, and since biological decomposition is a major cause of subsidence, reasons for the high decomposition rate were investigated.

Estimates of decomposition in field soils based on ash analyses failed to account for all the subsidence which has occurred, suggesting that considerable soil has been lost by means other than oeroblc decomposition of the leyers above the ground water level. Other possibilities are wind erosion and anaerobic decomposition below the water table. Appreciable decomposition rates measured in peat incubated under conditions of limited oxygen supply suggest that anaerobic decomposition contributes to subsidence in the field.

Alternate wetting and drying were found to accelerate the rate of decomposition. Immediately after each wetting a high Tate was observed, which declined gradually. Mixture of peat and muck soils with mineral soils was found to increase, rather than retard, loss of carbon from the organic soils. This was partly due to the higher pH of the mineral soils in some instances, but a similar effect was observed when no pH change occurred. Addition of plant residues to peat soils tends to counteract the effects of subsidence, even though normal amounts of residues are insufficient to maintain the soil elevation.

Evidence is presented, which indicates that subsidence rates in the Delta may be decreasing, and may eventually attain values comparable with those reported elsewhere. The experiments suggest that as a means of conserving peat and muck soils infrequent cultivation, high water table, and maximum return of crop residues to the soil are desirable.

Literature Cited

Bingeman C. W., Varner J. E., Martin W. P. The effects of the addition of organic materials on the biological decomposition of an organic soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1953. 17:34-38. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1953.03615995001700010008x [CrossRef]

Birch H. F. The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil. 1958. 10:9-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF01343734 [CrossRef]

Broadbent F. E., Bartholomew W. V. The effect of quantity of plant material added to soil on its rate of decomposition. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1948. 13:271-74. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1949.036159950013000C0048x [CrossRef]

Broadbent F. E., Norman A. G. Some factors affecting the availability of the organic nitrogen in soil—a preliminary report. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1946. 11:264-67. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1947.036159950011000C0050x [CrossRef]

Chase F. E., Gray P. H. H. Application of the Warburg respirometer in studying respiratory activity in soil. Canadian Jour. Microbiol. 1957. 3:335-49. DOI: 10.1139/m57-038 [CrossRef]

Corbet A. S. Studies on tropical soil microbiology: I. The evolution of carbon dioxide from the soil and the bacterial growth curve. Soil Sci. 1934. 37:109-15. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193402000-00005 [CrossRef]

Cosby S. W. Soil survey of the Sacramenta-San Joaquin Delta area, California 1941. USDA Bur. Pub. Inf. Series 1935, No. 21.

Darby H. C. The drainage of the Fens. 1940. Cambridge University Press.

Feustel I. C., Byers H. G. The physical and chemical characteristics of certain American peat profiles. USDA Tech. Bul. 1930. 214:

Hallam M. J., Bartholomew W. V. Influence of rate of plant residue addition in accelerating the decomposition of soil organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1953. 17:365-68. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1953.03615995001700040016x [CrossRef]

Jongedyk H. S., Hickok R. B., Mayer I. D., Ellis N. Subsidence of muck soils in Northern Indiana. Indiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 1950. 366:

Neller J. R. Oxidation loss of lowmoor peat in fields with different water tables. Soil Sci. 1944. 58:195-204. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-194409000-00002 [CrossRef]

Stephens J. C. Subsidence of organic soils in the Florida Everglades. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1956. 20:77-80. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1956.03615995002000010019x [CrossRef]

Stotzky G., Mortensen J. L. Effect of addition level and maturity of rye tissue on the decomposition of a muck soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1958. 22:521-24. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200060012x [CrossRef]

Waksman S. A., Purvis E. R. The microbiological population of peat. Soil Sci. 1932. 34:95-109. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193208000-00002 [CrossRef]

Waksman S. A., Stevens K. R. Contribution to the chemical composition of peat: V. The role of microorganisms in peat formation and decomposition. Soil Sci. 1929. 28:315-39. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192910000-00001 [CrossRef]

Weir W. W. Subsidence of peat lands of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. Hilgardia. 1950. 20(3):37-56. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v20n03p037 [CrossRef]

Wilson B. D., Staker E. V. The character of the peat deposits of New York. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir. 1933. 149: