Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

Experiments on setting fruit with growth-regulating substances on field-grown tomatoes in California

Authors

Louis K. Mann
P. A. Minges

Authors Affiliations

Louis K. Mann was Assistant Professor of Truck Crops and Assistant Olericulturist in the Experiment Station; P. A. Minges was Extension Specialist in Truck Crops.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 19(10):309-337. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v19n10p309. December 1949.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Abstract does not appear. First page follows.

Introduction

The failure of tomatoes to set fruit on the early flower clusters is a common complaint of California growers who produce for the spring and summer market. Poor fruit-set is usually ascribed to low temperatures. (Went (1944)) has suggested that night temperatures in particular have an important influence on fruit-set.

In each spring-market area, after the danger of winter frost, there follows a period of 6 weeks to 3 months when day temperatures are conducive to good vegetative growth, but night temperatures may drop too low for proper setting. The cool period in the Imperial and Coachella valleys occurs in late February and early March, but by late March night temperatures usually are satisfactory. In the Tulare district, night temperatures may run too low during early and mid-April, but normally no trouble in setting is experienced after May first. In the coastal districts, which are influenced by cool breezes from the ocean, low night temperatures may occur well into June; in the San Francisco Bay district they occur even into July. In each district the earliest fruit generally brings the best market price. Failure of the early clusters to set fruit may mean a delayed harvest period; even, perhaps, a short one because of competition from districts which produce for a later market.

Fruit-set for the canning crop is satisfactory in most years. Early production is less important. Only in the San Francisco Bay district do growers frequently complain of poor fruit-set of this crop.

In the northern United States, where fruit-set on greenhouse tomatoes is poor during the short overcast days of winter, growth-regulating substances have proved effective for increasing yields. In California, where no commercial field tests had been reported, experiments were begun in 1945 to determine if growth substances would increase fruit-set under field conditions.

Literature Cited

Anonymous. Tomato yields increased by field application of hormones. Market Growers Jour. 1948. 77(5):8 46,49

Gustafson Felix G. Parthenocarpic and normal fruits compared as to percentage of setting and size. Bot. Gaz. 1940. 102:280-86. DOI: 10.1086/334958 [CrossRef]

Gustafson Felix G. ß-Naphthoxyacetic acid as an inductor of parthenocarpy in tomatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1942. 40:387-89.

Hamner Charles L., Schomer Harold A., Marth Paul C. Application of growth-regulating substance in aerosol form, with special reference to fruit-set in tomato. Bot. Gaz. 1944. 106:108-23. DOI: 10.1086/335274 [CrossRef]

Howlett Freeman S. Experiments concerning the practicability of certain chemicals as a means of inducing fruit setting in the tomato. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1939. 37:886-90.

Howlett Freeman S. Use of chemicals to stimulate fruitfulness in tomatoes. Vegetable Growers Association of America Inc. Ann. Rept. 1941. 1941:203-14.

Howlett Freeman S. Growth-promoting chemicals improve greenhouse tomato production. Ohio Exp. Sta. Bimonthly Bul. 1943. 28(220):17-27.

Howlett Freeman S., Marth Paul. Aerosol applications of growth-regulating substances to the greenhouse tomato. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1946. 48:458-74.

Janes Byron E. Some chemical differences between artificially produced parthenocarpic fruits and normal seeded fruits of tomato. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1941. 28:639-46. DOI: 10.2307/2436961 [CrossRef]

Mitchell John W. Plant growth regulators. Science in farming. U.S.D.A. Yearbook of Agriculture. 1947. 1943-1947:256-66. DOI: 10.2307/2483127 [CrossRef]

Mitchell John W., Whitehead Muriel R. Effects of vaporous naphthoxyacetic acid on development of tomato fruits, with special reference to their vitamin C content. Bot. Gaz. 1942. 104:362-65. DOI: 10.1086/335141 [CrossRef]

Murneek A. E., Wittwer S. H., Hemphill D. D. Supplementary “hormone” sprays for greenhouse-grown tomatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1944. 45:371-81.

Roberts R. H., Esther Struckmeyer B. The use of sprays to set greenhouse tomatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1944. 44:417-27.

Schroeder R. A. Application of plant hormones to tomato ovaries. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1937. 35:537-38.

Strong Miriam C. The effect of various growth-promoting chemicals on the production of tomato fruits in the greenhouse. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bul. 1941. 24(1):56-64.

Strong Miriam C. Improvement of greenhouse tomato production by use of vaporous beta naphthoxyacetic acid. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bul. 1944. 27(2):225-36.

Strong Miriam C. Use of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid for the improvement of greenhouse tomato production. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bul. 1946. 28(3):216-25.

Went F. W. Plant growth under controlled conditions. II. Thermoperiodicity in growth and fruiting of the tomato. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1944. 31:135-50. DOI: 10.2307/2437636 [CrossRef]

Wittwer S. H., Stallworth H., Howell M. J. The value of a “hormone” spray for overcoming delayed fruit set and increasing yields of outdoor tomatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1948. 51:371-80.

Zimmerman P. W., Hitchcock A. E. Substituted phenoxy and benzoic acid growth substances and the relation of structure to physiological activity. Boyce Thompson Inst. Contrib. 1942. 12:321-43.

Zimmerman P. W., Hitchcock A. E. Substances effective for increasing fruit set and inducing seedless tomatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 1944. 45:353-61.

Zimmerman P. W., Hitchcock A. E., Harvill E. K. Xylenoxy growth substances. Boyce Thompson Inst. Contrib. 1944. 13:273-80.

Mann L, Minges P. 1949. Experiments on setting fruit with growth-regulating substances on field-grown tomatoes in California. Hilgardia 19(10):309-337. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v19n10p309
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu