Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of Turkey wheats C. I. 1558B and C. I. 2578
Author
Fred N. BriggsAuthor Affiliations
Fred N. Briggs was Assistant Professor of Agronomy and Assistant Agronomist in the Experiment Station.Publication Information
Hilgardia 10(1):17-25. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v10n01p017. January 1936.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
Introduction
Turkey is the name most commonly applied to the Crimean group of hard red winter wheats grown in the United States. In 1924, according to Clark and his eo-workers.(11) the hard red winter wheats comprised 41.4 per cent of the total wheat acreage in this country; and Turkey, including Kanred, made up 91.7 per cent of the acreage devoted to hard red winter wheat. At that time, therefore, over 36 per cent of the entire wheat acreage was devoted to Turkey. This type of wheat was first brought to the United States in 1873 and was grown in Kansas.(8) Since that time numerous introductions have been made both by private and by public agencies. Other names that have been applied to the type are Alberta Red, Argentine, Bulgarian, Crimean, Defiance, Egyptian, Hard Winter, Hundred-and-One, Hungarian, Improved Turkey, Kharkoff, Lost Freight, Malcome, Malakof, Minnesota Red Cross, Minnesota Reliable, Pioneer Turkey, Red Russian, Red Winter, Romanella, Russian, Taurenian, Theiss, Turkey Red, Turkish Red, Ulta, Wisconsin No. 18, and World’s Champion.
Recently certain strains of Turkey wheat have been distributed under other varietal names based on performance records and slight morphological differences. It has been long recognized that there are both morphological and physiological differences between certain of these Turkey strains. Sherman(9) and Oro(10) are two such wheats.
The Turkey wheats have been an important source of varieties resistant to bunt (Tilletia tritici), for genetic studies and for the production of other resistant varieties. Of the 17 most resistant varieties discovered by Tisdale and his co-workers.(14) 11 were Turkey wheats.
Literature Cited
[1] Bressman E. N. Varietal resistance, physiologic specialization and inheritance studies in bunt of wheat. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1931. 281:1-44.
[2] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk) winter, in wheat. Jour. Agr. Research. 1926. 32:973-90.
[3] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of the second Hussar factor for resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in Hussar wheat. Jour. Agr. Research. 1930. 40:225-32.
[4] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in White Odessa wheat. Jour. Agr. Research. 1930. 40:353-59.
[5] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in hybrids of White Federation and Banner Berkeley wheats. Jour. Agr. Research. 1931. 42:307-13.
[6] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in crosses of White Federation and Turkey wheats. Jour. Agr. Research. 1932. 44:121-6.
[7] Briggs F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in Sherman and Oro wheat hybrids. Genetics. 1934. 19:73-82.
[8] Clark J. Allen, Martin John H., Ball Carleton R. Classification of American wheat varieties. U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bul. 1923. 1074:1-237.
[9] Clark J. Allen, Love H. H., Gaines E. F. Registration of improved wheat varieties. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 1926. 18:922-35.
[10] Clark J. Allen, Parker J. H., Waldron L. R. Registration of improved wheat varieties, III. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 1928. 20:1318-22.
[11] Clark J. Allen, et al. Distribution of the classes and varieties of wheat in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bul. 1929. 1498:1-68.
[12] Kiesselbach T. A., Anderson Arthur. Breeding winter wheats for resistance to stinking smut. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Research Bul. 1930. 51:1-22.
[13] Reed G. M. Physiologic races of bunt of wheat. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1928. 15:157-70.
[14] Tisdale W. H., et al. Relative resistance of wheat to bunt in the Pacific Coast states. U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bul. 1925. 1299:1-22.
Also in this issue:
Experiments in the control of Rhizoctonia damping-off of citrus seedlingsPear packing plant economies: Study shows possible variations in plant organization and operation offer potential reductions in inplant packing costs
Irrigation pumping plant costs: Capacity of well, design and power of pumping plant must be engineered to fit water needs of crop for operating economy
Three new hybrid tomatoes: Crosses between male-sterile and fertile varieties prove superior for quality and early yield of market tomatoes
Flare-up of oriental fruit moth: Costly outbreak of pest of peach orchards in 1954 resulted in co-operative research in 1955 to develop control program
Powdery mildew on peach trees: Comparative effectiveness of sulfur and other chemicals for control of peach powdery mildew in tests near Linden
Citrus replant seedling tests: Trifoliate orange rootstock shows better growth in old citrus soil than other seedlings included in replant problem study
Sulfur dioxide injury on citrus: Riverside tests show orange trees to be resistant to plantdamaging air pollutant at known atmospheric concentrations
Filbertworm Injury to Walnuts
Mechanized Cucumber Picking
Manure as Source of Nitrogen