Morphological development of the fruit of Juglans regia
Author
Charlotte G. NastAuthor Affiliations
Charlotte G. Nast was Associate in Pomology.Publication Information
Hilgardia 9(7):345-381. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v09n07p345. May 1935.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
Introduction
A major portion of the literature concerning the floral morphology of Juglans regia L. was published in the latter part of the Nineteenth Century and early Twentieth by French and German workers. Hicoria pecan, on the other hand, has been investigated within the last five to eight years by English and American workers. Van Tieghem,(15) the first to publish on the morphology of Juglans species, was interested in proving, to uphold his theory of parietal placentation, that the orthotropous ovule of the walnut is really an anatropous ovule, inserted on a single edge of one of the two sporophylls of the pistil. He used the vascular anatomy in this work and thus reported the number of bundles arising from the floral pedicel and the branches resulting from them. Errors have been found, especially in his interpretation of the ventral carpellary system. He also studied abnormal fruits to show that at one time in the phylogeny of the fruit there were four anatropous ovules, three of which have since aborted, leaving only the ovule traces to indicate their previous existence. He reported, therefore, that four ovule branches arise from each of the four marginals, but only one terminates in the ovule. The other three are the traces to his so-called “aborted ovules.” No other workers have reported this condition except Benson and Welsford,(2) who agree with him in all respects. They consider the placental bundles as built up of leaf traces diverging at the base of the flower and depict fruits with the two placental bundles of unequal size. They have, however, no illustrations of the three nonfunctional traces, but merely agree with Van Tieghem’s explanation of such a situation.
Literature Cited
[1] Adriance Guy. Factors influencing fruit setting in the pecan. Bot. Gaz. 1931. 91:144-166.
[2] Benson M., Welsford E. J. The morphology of the ovule and female flower of Juglans regia and of a few allied genera. Ann. Bot. [London]. 1909. 23:625-633.
[3] Billings F. H. Chalazogamy in Carya olivaeformis. Bot. Gaz. 1903. 35:134-135.
[4] Braun A. Über den inneren Bau der Frucht der Juglandeen. Bot. Ztg. 1872. 30:371-375.
[5] Candolle C. de. Memoire sur la famille des Juglandees. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser. IV. 1862. 18:5-48.
[6] Holm T. Morphological study of Carya alba and Juglans nigra. Bot. Gaz. 1921. 72:375-389.
[7] Karsten G. Über die Entwickelung der weiblichen Blüthen bei einigen Juglandaceen. Flora [Jena]. 1902. 90:316-333.
[8] Langdon L. M. Embryogeny of Carya and Juglans a comparative study. Bot. Gaz. 1934. 96:93-117.
[9] Lubbock Sir John. On the fruit and seed of the Juglandaceae. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. [London]. 1891. 28:247-254.
[10] Nawaschin S. Ein neues Beispiel der Chalazogamie. Bot. Centralb. 1895. 63:353-357.
[11] Nicoloff M. Th. Sur le type floral et le development du fruit des Juglandees. Jour. Bot. [Paris]. 1904-5. 18:134-152. 280-285; 19: 63-84
[12] Rowlee W. W., Hastings G. T. The seed and seedlings of some Amentiferae. Bot. Gaz. 1898. 26:349-553.
[14] Schuhart D. V. Morphology and anatomy of the fruit of Hicoria pecan. Bot. Gaz. 1932. 93:1-20.
[14] Schuhart D. V. The morphological differentiation of the pistillate flowers of the pecan. Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 34:687-697.
[15] Van Tieghem P. Anatomie de la fleur femelle et du fruit du noyer. Bul. Soc. Bot. France. 1861. 16:412-419.
[16] Woodroof J. G., Woodroof N. C. Fruit bud differentiation and subsequent development of the flowers in Hicoria pecan. Jour. Agr. Research. 1926. 33:677-685.
[17] Woodroof J. G., Woodroof N. C. The development of the pecan nut (Hicoria pecan) from flower to maturity. Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 34:1049-1063.
[18] Woodroof N. C. Development of the embryo sac and young embryo of Hicoria pecan. Brit Amer. Jour. Bot. 1928. 15:416-421.
[19] Woodworth Robert H. Meiosis of microsporogenesis in Juglandaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1930. 17:863-869.
Also in this issue:
Deciduous fruits: Trends and prospects as influenced by population and national income studiedFertiIized pastures: Legumes and perennial grasses respond to split-fertilization in range tests
Yellow clover aphid on alfalfa: Pest not ruinous to state's alfalfa industry but production costs increased by frequent field inspections and treatments
Biological control: Natural enemies of aphid in California sought in European, Mid-East countries
Chemical control: Insecticides when properly applied will give effective commercial control of pest
Resistant plants: Alfalfa variety resistant to aphid attack and adapted to desert areas planned
Prune harvest methods, costs: Comparative study made on efficiency of various types of labor-saving equipment used in 1954 prune harvest season
Effects of irrigation on the growth and yield of cotton: Amounts and timing of applications influence lint grade and staple length
Effects of irrigation on the growth and yield of cotton: Fruting, defoliation, lodging, boll opening related to available moisture
Combine used in corn: Two types of gathering attachments successful in harvesting trials in 1954
Field corn pickers: Tests indicate two operational factors have important effect on field losses
Hybrid corn trials: Effect of summer temperatures on corn maturity in Santa Barbara County