Some properties of the curly-top virus
Authors
Henry H. P. SeverinJulius H. Freitag
Authors Affiliations
Henry H. P. Severin was Associate Entomologist in the Experiment Station; Julius H. Freitag was Research Assistant in the Experiment Station.Publication Information
Hilgardia 8(1):1-48. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v08n01p001. October 1933.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
According to some plant pathologists the virus diseases of plants are divided into two groups, the mosaic and the yellows diseases. The mosaic diseases under optimum conditions cause a mottling of the leaves, usually in the growing tissues of the plants. Some of the mosaic diseases are highly infectious, while others are not, and some have not been transmitted mechanically. Some of the mosaic viruses have been shown to be filterable, but others are not. Intracellular, cell inclusions, or x-bodiesare associated with many diseases of this group. Mosaic viruses are transmitted mostly by sucking insects, usually aphids, rarely by chewing insects. Some single species of aphids are associated with the dissemination of many separate mosaic viruses, other species with the spread of but one mosaic virus. The peach aphid (Myzus persicae) is associated with the dissemination of fourteen separate virus diseases, and the potato aphid (Macrosiphum solaniiolii) is associated with the spread of six plant viruses. (57) Some insects are mechanical vectors of mosaic viruses, as in the case of cucumber mosaic, (15) and retain the virus for only a short time. The aphid vector of spinach blight retains the infective power for a period of five days. (38) Some mosaic diseases are transmitted through the seeds.
Literature Cited
[1] Allard H. A. The mosaic disease of tobacco. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 1914. 40:1-33.
[2] Allard H. A. Effect of dilution on the infectivity of the virus of the mosaic disease of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Research. 1915. 3:295-299.
[3] Allard H. A. Some properties of the virus of the mosaic disease of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Research. 1916. 6:649-674.
[4] Beijerinck M. W. Ueber ein Contagium vivum fluidum als Ursache der Fleckenkrankheit der Tabaksblätter. Verhandel. K. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam sect. 2. 1898. deel 6 p. 1-22.
[5] Beijerinck M. W. Uber ein Contagium vivum fluidum als Ursache der Fleckenkranheit der Tabaksblätter. Centrbl. Bakt. 1899. 5:27-33.
[6] Brewer P. H., Kraybill H. R., Samson R. W., Gardner M. W. Purification and certain properties of the virus of typical mosaic. Phytopathology. 1930. 20:943-950.
[7] Carsner E., Stahl C. F. Studies on curly-top disease of the sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Research. 1924. 28:297-320.
[8] Carsner E., Stahl F. C. Progress report on curly top of the sugar beet. Phytopathology. 1924. 14:122-123.
[9] Carter W. A technique for use with homopterous vectors of plant diseases, with special reference to the sugar-beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 34: p. 449-451.
[10] Carter W. An improvement in the technique for feeding homopterous insects. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:246-247.
[11] Carter W. Transmission of the virus of curly top of sugar beets through different solutions. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:675-679.
[12] Chapman G. H. Mosaic disease of tobacco. Massachusetts Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1917. 175:72-117.
[13] Clinton G. P. Chlorosis of plants with special reference to calico of tobacco. Connecticut Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept. 1915. 1914:357-424.
[14] Doolittle S. P. A new infectious mosaic disease of cucumber. Phytopathology. 1916. 6:145-147.
[15] Doolittle S. P. The mosaic disease of cucurbits. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant. Indus. Bul. 1920. 879:1-69.
[16] Duggar B. M., Karrer J. L. The sizes of the infective particles in the mosaic disease of tobacco. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1921. 8:343-356. DOI: 10.2307/2989986 [CrossRef]
[17] Dunlap A. A. The total nitrogen and carbohydrate, and the relative rates of respiration, in virus-infected plants. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1930. 17:348-357. DOI: 10.2307/2435925 [CrossRef]
[18] Elze D. L. De verspreiding van virusziekten van den aardappel (Solanum tuberosum L. 1927. door insecten. [Transmission experiments with insects of virus diseases of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).] Mededeel. van de Landbouwhoogesch. te Wageningen, Nederland. 30: Verhandel 2, 1
[19] Fajardo T. J. Studies on the properties of the bean-mosaic virus. Phytopathology. 1930. 20:883-888.
[20] Freitag J. H., Severin H. H. P. List of ornamental flowering plants experimentally infected with curly top. The Plant Disease Reporter. 1933. 17:2-5. (Issued by the U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant Indus.)
[21] Goldsworthy M. C. Attempts to cultivate the tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopathology. 1926. 16:873-875.
[22] Grainger J. An infectious chlorosis of the dock. Leeds Phil. Soc. Sci. Sec. Proc. 1928. 1:360
[23] Grainger J. An attempt to cultivate the virus of tobacco mosaic in vitro. Leeds Phil. Soc. Sci. Sec. Proc. 1930. 2:33-35.
[24] Grainger J., Cockerham G. Some properties of the virus extract of dock mosaic. Leeds Phil. and Lit. Soc. Sci. Sec. Proc. 1930. 2:120-124.
[25] Holmes F. O. Accuracy in quantitative work with tobacco mosaic virus. Bot. Gaz. 1928. 86:66-81. DOI: 10.1086/333873 [CrossRef]
[26] Iwanowski D. Ueber zwei Krankheiten der Tabakspflanze. Abstr. Beih. Bot. Centrbl. 1893. 3:266-268.
[27] Iwanowski D. Uber die Mosaikkrankheit der Tabakspflanze. Zeitschr. Pflanzenkrank. 1903. 13:1-44.
[28] Jagger I. C. Experiments with the cucumber mosaic disease. Phytopathology. 1916. 6:148-151.
[29] Johnson J. The classification of plant viruses. Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1927. 76:1-16.
[30] Johnson J. The properties and behavior of potato rugose mosaic. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:141
[31] Johnson J. The classification of certain virus diseases of the potato. Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1929. 87:1-24.
[32] Johnson J., Grant T. J. The properties of plant viruses from different host species. Phytopathology. 1932. 22:741-757.
[33] Koch K. The potato rugose mosaic complex. Science n.s. 1931. 73:615 DOI: 10.1126/science.73.1901.615 [CrossRef]
[34] Konig C. J. Die Flecken oder Mosaikkrankheit des holländeschen Tabaks. Zeitschr. Pflanzenkrank. 1899. 9:65-80.
[35] Kunkel L. O. Studies on aster yellows. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1926. 13:646-705. DOI: 10.2307/2435474 [CrossRef]
[36] Kunkel L. O., Rivers T. W. Virus diseases in plants. Filterable viruses. 1928. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co. p. 335-364. In:
[37] Kunkel L. O. Studies on aster yellows in some new host plants. Boyce Thompson Inst. Contrib. 1931. 3:85-123.
[38] McClintock J. A., Smith L. B. True nature of spinach-blight and relation of insects to its transmission. Jour. Agr. Research. 1918. 18:1-60.
[39] McKinney H. H. Factors affecting certain properties of a mosaic virus. Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 35:1-12.
[40] McKinney H. H. Quantitative and purification methods in virus studies. Jour. Agr. Research. 1927. 35:13-28.
[41] Mulvania M. Cultivation of the virus of tobacco mosaic by the method of Olitsky. Science n.s. 1925. 62:37 DOI: 10.1126/science.62.1593.37 [CrossRef]
[42] Mulvania M. Studies on the nature of the virus of tobacco mosaic. Phytopathology. 1926. 16:853-871.
[43] Olitsky P. K. Experiments on the cultivation of the active agent of tobacco and tomato mosaic. Science n.s. 1924. 60:593-594. DOI: 10.1126/science.60.1565.593 [CrossRef]
[44] Olitsky P. K. Experiments on the cultivation of the active agent of mosaic disease in tobacco and tomato plants. Jour. Exp. Med. 1925. 41:129-136. DOI: 10.1084/jem.41.1.129 [CrossRef]
[45] Priode C. N. Further studies on the ring-spot disease of tobacco. Amer Jour. Bot. 1928. 15:88-93. DOI: 10.2307/2435865 [CrossRef]
[46] Purdy H. A. Attempt to cultivate an organism from tomato mosaic. Bot. Gaz. 1926. 81:210-217. DOI: 10.1086/333587 [CrossRef]
[47] Samuel G. Some experiments on inoculation methods with plant viruses, and on local lesions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1931. 18:494-507. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1931.tb02320.x [CrossRef]
[48] Severin H. H. P. Minimum incubation periods of causative agent of curly leaf in beet leafhopper and sugar beet. Phytopathology. 1921. 11:424-429. Summary 12: 105
[49] Severin H. H. P. Curly leaf transmission experiments. Phytopathology. 1924. 14:103-107. Summary 14: 123
[50] Severin H. H. P. Crops naturally infected with sugar-beet curly top. Science. 1927. 66:137-138. DOI: 10.1126/science.66.1701.137 [CrossRef]
[51] Severin H. H. P. Some host plants of curly top. Hilgardia. 1928. 3:339-392.
[52] Severin H. H. P. Additional host plants of curly top. Hilgardia. 1929. 3:595-629.
[53] Severin H. H. P. Modes of curly top transmission by the beet leafhopper, Eutettix tenellus (Baker). Hilgardia. 1931. 6: p. 253-276.
[54] Severin H. H. P., Freitag J. H. List of ornamental flowering plants naturally infected with curly top or yellows diseases in California. The Plant Disease Reporter. 1933. 17:1-2. (Issued by the U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant Indus.)
[55] Severin H. H. P., Swezy O. Filtration experiments on curly top of sugar beets. Phytopathology. 1928. 18:681-690.
[56] Smith J. H. Experiments with a mosaic disease of tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1928. 15:155-167. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1928.tb07044.x [CrossRef]
[57] Smith K. M. Virus diseases of plants and their relationship with insect vectors. Biol. Rev. 1931. 6:302-344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1931.tb01029.x [CrossRef]
[58] Starrett R. C. A new host of sugar beet curly top. Phytopathology. 1929. 19:1031-1035.
[59] Storey H. H. The transmission of streak disease of maize by the leafhopper, Balclutha mbila Naude. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1925. 12: p. 422-439. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1925.tb04238.x [CrossRef]
[60] Swezy O. Factors influencing the minimum incubation periods of curly top in the beet leafhopper. Phytopathology. 1930. 20:93-100.
[61] Valleau W. D., Johnson E. M. Observations and experiments on the control of true tobacco mosaic. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1927. 280:145-174.
[62] Valleau W. D., Johnson E. M. Commercial tobaccos and cured leaf as a source of mosaic disease in tobacco. Phytopathology. 1927. 17:513-522.
[63] Walker M. N. A comparative study of the mosaic diseases of cucumber, tomato, and Physalis. Phytopathology. 1926. 19: p. 431-458.
Also in this issue:
Alfalfa hay profit expectation: Shifts in land-use pattern resulting from cotton acreage allotments influenced by price expectationSalt concentrate mixtures: Consumption of self-fed supplemental feed mixtures can maintain range animals on good nutrient level
Imperial valley lamb feeding: Data on rates of gain per month and per acre obtained in winter season feeding trials on alfalfa pasture
Heating poultry drinking water: Electrically heating poultry watering systems by different methods tested for economy of operation
Blackberries resistant to wilt: Certain varieties of the trailing berry resistant to Verticillium wilt may be grown in infested soil
Poinsettia bud initiation dates: Study of bud initiation dates enables growers to produce and time better poinsettia flowers
Control of the frosted scale: Tests in southern California indicate parathion sprays effective treatment against pest on walnut
Oxidation of sulfur in soils: Nitrogen losses during oxidation may cause temporary setback to plants following applications of sulfur
Infiltration rates: Effect of wetting agents in water on infiltration rates into soils
Brassica-root nematode here: Pest formerly unknown in the United States found to be established in fields in Half Moon Bay area
Seasonal use of dairy products: Studies of Sacramento families showed how uses of dairy products varied with season