Survey identifies sediment sources in North Coast rangelands

Price, J; Harper, J; Lewis, D; Tate, K

Survey identifies sediment sources in North Coast rangelands

Authors

Julie Price
John M. Harper
David J. Lewis
Kenneth W. Tate

Authors Affiliations

J. Price is County Planner, Planning and Building Department, Mendocino County; J.M. Harper is Livestock and Natural Resources Advisor and Agricultural Technician, Mendocino County; D.J. Lewis is Watershed Management Advisor, Marin, Mendocino and Sonoma counties; K.W. Tate is Rangeland Watershed Specialist, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, UC Davis.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 55(4):32-38. DOI:10.3733/ca.v055n04p32. July 2001.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

We conducted a sediment source survey to gain insight into soil erosion on Northern California rangeland watersheds and to provide information to facilitate informed land-use management, conservation prioritization and water-quality regulation decisions. The results indicate that by focusing on erosion associated with natural and historical influences, inventory and assessment efforts on these watersheds can characterize the majority of sediment deliverable to streams. While this volume of sediment does not require mitigation under current water-quality regulations, it none-theless prohibits the ability of instream sediment monitoring to detect water-quality changes. Water-quality regulations require managers to create inventories for all sources with 10 cubic yards or more of potentially deliverable sediment. If a monitoring threshold of 100 cubic yards was used, more than 99% of the deliverable sediment identified in this survey would be inventoried. This would require developing inventories for only 82 of the 117 sites in this study. Overall, we determined that rangeland managers can achieve the greatest reductions in sediment generation by focusing on erosion from roads.

References

Cafferata PH, Poole C. Watershed assessment for the east branch of Soquel Creek. 1993. Sacramento, CA: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 54.

Critchley WRS, Reji C, Willcocks TJ. Indigenous soils and water conservation: A review of the state of knowledge and prospects for building on traditions. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation. 1994. 5:293-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3400050406

[EPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. California's 1998 Section 303(d) List. 1998. San Francisco, CA: US EPA Region 9. www.epa.gov/region09/water/tmdl/calist/list.html

Furman B, Schott T, Keiffer B, Cummins R. North Coast Erosion and Sediment Control Pilot Project: Tomki Creek Watershed.. 1983. Ukiah, CA: Mendocino County Resource Conservation District. 167p.

Lewis DJ, Tate KW, Harper JM. Sediment delivery inventory and monitoring. 2000. Davis, CA: UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Pub 8014. 14. http://danrcs.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8014.pdf

Lewis J, Rice R. Site conditions related to erosion on private timberlands in Northern California: Final report. In: Critical Sites Erosion Study.. 1989. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Forestry and USDA Forest Service. http://danrcs.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8014.pdf

MacDonald LH. Sediment monitoring: Reality and hope. In: US EPA and USFS technical workshop on sediments. 1992. Washington, DC: Terrene Institute. p. 81-87.

Meadowbrook Conservation Associates. Survey of road-related sediment sources in the Deer and Mill Creek watersheds. 1996. Tehama County, CA: For National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. 48 p.

[NCRWQCB] North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Water-quality attainment strategy (total maximum daily load) for sediment for the Garcia River watershed. 1998a. Santa Rosa, CA:

NCRWQCB. Proposed Redwood Creek water-quality attainment strategy for sediment (total maximum daily loads and implementation plan). 1998b. Santa Rosa, CA:

Pacific Watershed Associates. Pine Creek Watershed Assessment Report: A Plan of Action for Erosion Prevention and Erosion Control in the Pine Creek Watershed, Hoopa, CA.. 1990. Arcata, CA: 132.

Pretty JN, Shah P. Making soil and water conservation sustainable from coercion and control to partnership and participation. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation. 1997. 8:39-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199703)8:1/39::AID-LDR242/3.0.CO;2-F

Rice R. Erosion on logging roads in Redwood Creek, northwestern California. J Am Water Resources Assoc. 1999. 35(5):1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04204.x

[SWRCB] State Water Resources Control Board. Impaired Water Bodies 303(d) List and TMDLs. 2001. www.swrcb.ca.gov/tmdl/303d_lists.html

Also in this issue:

The spatial variability of water and solute transport properties in unsaturated soil: I. Analysis of property variation and spatial structure with statistical models

Research collaboration best defense against Pierce's disease

Staff Changes

Letters

Science briefs

Scientists, state aggressively pursue Pierce's disease

How to distinguish glassy-winged sharpshooter from its “look-a-likes”

Proximity to citrus influences Pierce's disease in Temecula Valley vineyards

Egg-laying and brochosome production observed in glassy-winged sharpshooter

Insecticides sought to control adult glassy-winged sharpshooter

New closterovirus in ‘Redglobe’ grape causes decline of grafted plants

The spatial variability of water and solute transport properties in unsaturated soil: II. Scaling models of water transport

Alfalfa water use pinpointed in saline, shallow water tables of Imperial Valley

Sudangrass uses water at rates similar to alfalfa, depending on location