The price of water: Market-based strategies are needed to cope with scarcity
Author
David SundingAuthor Affiliations
D. Sunding is Director, Center for Sustainable Resource Development, and Cooperative Extension Specialist, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.Publication Information
Hilgardia 54(2):56-63. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n02p56. March 2000.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Growing population and environmental concerns are increasing the demand for California's water resources. Historically, the state has dealt with shortages by expanding supply. In the coming years, new strategies will be required to allocate water among existing and emerging uses and to create additional supplies by nontraditional means. Three techniques will form the foundation of water management in the next era: water markets, water-use efficiency and active conjunctive use. Such methods establish prices for water that more accurately reflect costs, encouraging conservation and more efficient use patterns.
References
Carey J, Sunding D, Zilberman D. Trading behavior in permit markets: Theory and application to the California water market. Agric Econ 2000 (in press).
Cooter R. Unity in tort, contract and property: The model of precaution. Calif Law Review. 1985. 73:1-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480463
Green G, Sunding D, Zilberman D, Parker D. Explaining irrigation technology choice: A microparameter approach. Am J Agric Econ. 1996. 78:1064-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243862
Howe C, Lazo J, Weber K. The economic impacts of agriculture to urban water transfer on the area of origin: A case study of the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado. Am J Agric Econ. 1990. 72:1200-4. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242532
Howitt R, Moore N, Smith R. A Retrospective on California's 1991 Emergency Drought Water Bank. Sacramento: California Department of Water Resources 1994.
Moreno G, Osgood D, Sunding D, Zilberman D. Economic Valuation of Increased Water Supply Reliability and Water Trading Opportunities in Westside Agriculture. Report to CALFED program, UC Berkeley Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1999.
Natural Heritage Institute. Feasibility Study of a Maximal Program of Groundwater Banking. 1998. San Francisco: p.77.
Sunding D, Zilberman D, Howitt R, et al. Measuring the cost of reallocating water from agriculture to the environment. Nat Resource Modeling 2000 (in press).
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture. 1997 Census of Agriculture. 1999. Highlights of Agriculture: 1997 and 1992 www.nass.usda.gov/census/census97/high-lights/ca/cast.txt
Vaux H, Howitt R. Managing water scarcity: An evaluation of interregional transfers. Water Resources Research 1984. 20pp.785-92.
Also in this issue:
Evaluation of genetically improved strains of Metaseiulus occidentalis (Nesbitt) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) for integrated control of spider mites on roses in greenhousesCritical choices ahead for natural resources
Q&A: Global warming: No easy answers
Is California's future hydraulically sustainable?
Restoring aquatic ecosystems is a matter of values
Nonprofit organizations gaining influence
Biodiversity is critical to future health of California's ecology and economy
California forest policy must bend toward the new social order
Soil salinity poses challenges for sustainable agriculture and wildlife
Trace elements slowly accumulating, depleting in soils
Recycled water is a promising new supply source