Pay method affects vineyard pruner performance
Authors
Maxwell V. NortonGregory E. Billikopf
Authors Affiliations
M. V. Norton is Viticulture Farm Advisor, Merced County; G. E. Billikopf is Area Labor Management Farm Advisor, Stanislaus County.Publication Information
Hilgardia 46(5):12-13. DOI:10.3733/ca.v046n05p12. September 1992.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
A new study indicates that vineyard pruners paid on a piece-rate basis tend to work more quickly than those paid by the hour. Pay method had little effect on pruning quality as perceived by growers, although crews paid by the hour did seem to do a slightly better job. Total pruning costs were also influenced by vine vigor and vineyard location.
Norton M, Billikopf G. 1992. Pay method affects vineyard pruner performance. Hilgardia 46(5):12-13. DOI:10.3733/ca.v046n05p12
Also in this issue:
Food safety: a matter of factEffects of immigration reform not as expected: California farmers still rely on new immigrants for field labor
Whitefly invasion in Imperial Valley costs growers, workers millions in losses
Cracks in irrigated clay soil may allow some drainage
Income risk varies with what you grow, where you grow it
“Residue-free” tomatoes? Bush tomatoes show very low levels of pesticide residues
Before-and-after tests on emitters show organic fertilizers can be injected through low-volume irrigation systems
Cost comparison: engines vs. electric motors for irrigation pumping
Gophers love oak — to death
Environmental factors contribute to acorn quality: Elevation, on- or off-tree collection influence the viability of blue oak acorns
Use of saline irrigation waters and minimal leaching for crop production