Comparison of four crops for alcohol yield
Authors
F. Jack HillsStanley S. Johnson
Akbar Abshahi
Gary R. Peterson
Shu Geng
Authors Affiliations
F. Jack Hills is Extension Agronomist, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis; Stanley S. Johnson is Agricultural Economist, College of Agriculture, University of Hawaii, Hilo (formerly with the U.S. Department of Agriculture at U.C., Davis]; Akbar Abshahi is former Graduate Student Department of Agronomy and Range Science, U.C., Davis; Gary R. Peterson is Extension Staff Research Associate, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, U.C., Davis; Shu Geng is Associate Professor and Biostatistician Department of Agronomy and Range Science, U.C., Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 37(3):17-19. DOI:10.3733/ca.v037n03p17. March 1983.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
One crop has no great advantage over others tested in this study
Hills F, Johnson S, Abshahi A, Peterson G, Geng S. 1983. Comparison of four crops for alcohol yield. Hilgardia 37(3):17-19. DOI:10.3733/ca.v037n03p17
Also in this issue:
The winrock reportUsing “blowdown” water to irrigate crops
Foreign workers in selected California crops
Side-whip grafting of grapevines to change over varieties
Evaluating low-pressure sprinkler systems
Clipping chaparral as a brush-management technique
Modifying weed sprayers for citrus thrips control
Fungicides for powdery mildew and rust in roses
California's low-income producer cooperatives
Doubling potential of sweet cherry cultivars
Monitoring lepidopterous pest damage to processing tomatoes
Fungus causes deterioration of dried prunes
Incidental effects of agricultural water conservation
Parasitic nematode controls western poplar clearwing moth
Flight and dispersal of the Mosquito Culex tarsalis Coquillett in the Sacramento Valley of California