Desert grapefruit pruning and orchard thinning trials
Authors
D. D. HalseyC. D. McCarty
S. B. Boswell
Authors Affiliations
D. D. Halsey is Farm Advisor, Riverside County; C. D. McCarty is Extension Horticultural Technologist.Publication Information
Hilgardia 26(3):7-9. DOI:10.3733/ca.v026n03p7. March 1972.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Pulling alternate trees and pruning to increase the amount of sunlight available to each tree failed to increase per-acre yield or grower returns over a four-year period in a red grapefruit grove near Coachella. The grove was planted in 1956 on fertile soil at a spacing of 13.5 × 24 ft with the expectation that alternate trees would be thinned out when the grove began to be crowded. The grower originally planned to inter-plant trees on rough lemon alternated with trees on Cleopatra mandarin. The trees on rough lemon were expected to give high early production and to be eliminated at thinning time, allowing the Cleopatra mandarin trees to remain for the permanent orchard. By 1967 when the plot work was undertaken, no trees had been pulled, and the grove was overcrowded and too shady.
Also in this issue:
What's my line?Ground cover species tolerance to herbicide applications
Poor grain sorghum production after rice improved by phosphorus banded near seed
Ancymidol applications retard plant growth of woody ornamentals
Experimental miticides on European red and Pacific mites
Sierra foothill range field station
Rest and dormancy in garlic