University of California

Bulls vs… steers conventional and Russian castrates amd effects of stilbestrol


W. J. Clawson
Reuben Albaugh
Don Petersen

Authors Affiliations

W. J. Clawson is Extension Animal Scientist, University of California, Davis; Reuben Albaugh is Extension Animal Scientist Emeritus, University of California, Davis; Don Petersen is Farm Advisor, Merced County.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 24(2):12-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v024n02p12. February 1970.

PDF of full article, Cite this article


Two significant findings of this experiment were: (1) Russian castrates were intermediate between steers and bulls in all phases of production (preweaning and postweaning), although these differences were not significant; (2) nursing steer calves implanted with 30 mg stilbestrol, and again as they entered the feedlot for finishing, performed just as well as those that were implanted first upon entering the feedlot—however, the double-implant animals produced carcasses that were 33 lbs heavier (cold weight) than those that were implanted only once (indicating that the cow-calf operator, as well as the cattle feeder, can secure benefits from stilbestrol implantation). Bulls again outperformed steers and Russian castrates (substantiating recent reports by other researchers) in daily gain, carcass index, and cutability as well as feed efficiency.

Clawson W, Albaugh R, Petersen D. 1970. Bulls vs… steers conventional and Russian castrates amd effects of stilbestrol. Hilgardia 24(2):12-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v024n02p12
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu