Bulls vs… steers conventional and Russian castrates amd effects of stilbestrol
AuthorsW. J. Clawson
Authors AffiliationsW. J. Clawson is Extension Animal Scientist, University of California, Davis; Reuben Albaugh is Extension Animal Scientist Emeritus, University of California, Davis; Don Petersen is Farm Advisor, Merced County.
Hilgardia 24(2):12-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v024n02p12. February 1970.
Two significant findings of this experiment were: (1) Russian castrates were intermediate between steers and bulls in all phases of production (preweaning and postweaning), although these differences were not significant; (2) nursing steer calves implanted with 30 mg stilbestrol, and again as they entered the feedlot for finishing, performed just as well as those that were implanted first upon entering the feedlot—however, the double-implant animals produced carcasses that were 33 lbs heavier (cold weight) than those that were implanted only once (indicating that the cow-calf operator, as well as the cattle feeder, can secure benefits from stilbestrol implantation). Bulls again outperformed steers and Russian castrates (substantiating recent reports by other researchers) in daily gain, carcass index, and cutability as well as feed efficiency.
Also in this issue:San Joaquin Center research emphasis: People's needs
Liquid scintillation counter aids pesticide research in soils at U. C. Riverside
Ethrel effects on fruit ripening of peppers
An economic analysis questions: Central sorting of cannery tomatoes
Frost control tests with lettuce and alfalfa: Blanket of ice keeps plants from freezing
Simazine for weed control in orchards
Effects of soil moisture asparagus at two conditions on nitrogen levels
Crop adaptation to high soil-water conditions
The effects of dates of harvest operations on yield and quality of pink beans