A study of pneumatic pruning in vineyards… and comparisons with hand pruning costs
Authors
L. P. ChristensenA. N. Kasimatis
B. B. Burlingame
D. A. Luvisi
Authors Affiliations
L. Peter Christensen is Farm Advisor, Fresno County; A. N. Kasimatis is Extension Viticulturist, University of California, Davis; Burt B. Burlingame is Extension Economist, Berkeley; Donald A. Luvisi is Farm Advisor, Kern County.Publication Information
Hilgardia 21(5):8-10. DOI:10.3733/ca.v021n05p8. May 1967.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
A study of nine commercial vineyard pruning operations covering some 3600 acres in four counties has shown that the manpower requirement for pruning was reduced an average of 30% during the 1965–66 season, when the use of pneumatic pruning machines was compared with conventional hand-pruning methods. A dollar savings averaging about 15% of the cost of hand pruning was also achieved, even after an original investment in pruning equipment of $12.65 per acre.
Christensen L, Kasimatis A, Burlingame B, Luvisi D. 1967. A study of pneumatic pruning in vineyards… and comparisons with hand pruning costs. Hilgardia 21(5):8-10. DOI:10.3733/ca.v021n05p8
Also in this issue:
Vertical distribution of fungus suggests… rigolen plowing for control of Verticillium wilt in cottonHeat treatment, and cutting, for increased sweet potato slip production
Progress report on Johnsongrass control in orchards
A comparison of 1x3x3-inch wafers and baled alfalfa hay for milk production
Population assessment of cotton bollworm in relation to pest control practices
Developing a meat index for beef cattle
Gypsum, sulfur, and sulfuric acid for reclaiming an alkali soil of the Fresno series