Effect of winter chilling on Bartlett pear and Jonathan apple trees
Authors
D. S. BrownW. H. Griggs
B. T. Iwakiri
Authors Affiliations
Dillon S. Brown is Professors and Pornlogists, Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis; William H. Griggs is Professors and Pornlogists, Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis; Ben T. Iwakiri is Laboratory Technician IV, Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 21(2):10-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v021n02p10. February 1967.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Observations of the test trees in this study indicate that (presumably because of in-continuity of chilling) a varying portion of apple and pear buds may fail to open, even after a winter such as 1964–65 which provided 1,560 hours of chilling temperatures. Good chilling during both December and January is especially critical. Since winter-chilling is insufficient, or poorly distributed in the important pear-producing districts of the state more often than in the apple districts, the results emphasize the importance of heading back vigorous upright branches on young pear trees to insure near-to-normal foliation and branching. Except after the mildest winters, or with varieties having a high chilling requirement like Rome Beauty, such a pruning practice is seldom beneficial on apple trees, however.
Also in this issue:
A comparison of deep and shallow drain tile for reduction of soil salinity in Imperial ValleyChemical growth control of Chinese elm trees
An evaluation of sprinkler irrigation for Imperial Valley
Effects of irrigation treatments on barley yields
Control of strawberry powdery mildew
The genus Aeolothrips haliday in North America (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae)