Cotton yields: Not affected by irrigation method on panoche clay loam
Authors
A. W. FryJ. R. Stockton
Y. Vaadia
J. R. Davis
Authors Affiliations
A. William Fry is Assistant Irrigation Engineer, University of California, Davis; John R. Stockton is Associate Specialist in Irrigation, Shafter Field Station, Shafter; Yoash Vaadia is Assistant Professor of Irrigation, U. C., Davis; John R. Davis is Lecturer and Specialist in Irrigation, U. C., Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 16(6):12-13. DOI:10.3733/ca.v016n06p12. June 1962.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Methods of irrigating cotton—whether furrow or sprinkler irrigation—apparently have no effect on yields. These tests on Panoche clay loam at the West Side Field Station, Fresno County, also indicate that irrigation methods caused no significant differences in soil conditions, soil moisture content and plant nutrient levels.
Fry A, Stockton J, Vaadia Y, Davis J. 1962. Cotton yields: Not affected by irrigation method on panoche clay loam. Hilgardia 16(6):12-13. DOI:10.3733/ca.v016n06p12
Also in this issue:
“… Reality better than the dream.”: Judge Shields' centennial messageA Progress report: Grape mechanical harvesting comes closer to reality
Seed size effects: On hybrid sweet corn in Coachella Valley
Temperature and olive yields
Wild oats sown for science yield the improved Sierra variety
Pear decline research
Plum root stocks for almonds: Incompatibility emphasized in source mix-up with certain plum combinations
The proposed Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and California Agriculture
The picric acid method for determining minute amounts of hydrocyanic acid in fumigated insects,
Relation of mortality to amounts of hydrocyanic acid recovered from fumigated resistant and nonresistant citrus scale insects