Growth predicted in biologically integrated and organic farming
AuthorsSean L. Swezey
Janet C. Broome
Hilgardia 54(4):26-35. DOI:10.3733/ca.v054n04p26. July 2000.
California agriculture faces multiple environmental challenges, the result of a fast-growing population, the increased role of consumers in decision-making about the food system, a more restrictive regulatory climate and mounting evidence of agriculture's contribution to non-point-source water pollution. At the same time, innovative partnerships invclving growers, consumers, commodity boards, regulators and university researchers are exploring creative solutions to these challenges through biologically integrated and organic farming systems. Simultaneously, the agricultural biotechnology industry is experiencing phenomenal growth. The U.S. food industry's resistance to labeling products that contain transgenic ingredients is stimulating consumer interest in organic products, which prohibit transgenics. Based on these trends and the growth of organic acreage and product sales, we predict that alternative farming systems could comprise at least 20% and as much as 60% of all California cropland in production in 2025. Nonetheless, research investments into alternative biologically integrated and organic methods lags far behind organic product sales.
Abelson PH, Hines PJ. The plant revolution. Science. 1999. 285:367-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5426.367
Barham E. What's in a name?. Eco-labeling in the global food system 1997. Accessed Oct 1999 www.pmac.net/bbarham.htm
Bradshaw TK, Muller B. Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: Application of new regional land-use policy models and geographic information systems. Rural Soc. 1998. 63(1):1-25.
Broome JC, Bugg RL, Denton D, et al. Promoting environmental health through biologically integrated farming systems. 1999. Poster at International Congress on Ecosystem Health. Sacramento, CA. Report #24. UC Genetic Resources Conservation Program.
Broome JC, Settle WH, Bugg RL, et al. Biologically integrated farming systems: approaches to voluntary reduction of agricultural chemical use. 1997. Proceedings of the Society of Toxicologists and Chemists annual meeting. Poster. San Francisco www.setac.org/pubsam.html
Brouder SM, Hill JE. Winter flooding of ricelands provides waterfowl habitat. Cal Ag. 1995. 49(6):58-64.
Burow KR, Shelton JL, Dubrovsky NM. US Geological Survey. Occurrence of nitrate and pesticides in groundwater beneath three agricultural land-use settings in the eastern San Joaquin Valley, California, 1993-1995. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4284 1998. p.51.
CALFED Bay-Delta Program. 1999. Accessed Oct 1999 http://calfed.ca.gov .
Clark WAV. Immigration, high fertility fuel state's population growth. Cal Ag. 2000. 64(1):11-8.
Conway G. The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the 21st Century. 1998. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 335.
Dlott J, Nelson T, Bugg RL, Thrupp LA. California USA: Merced County BIOS Project. New Partnerships for Sustainable Agriculture. 1996. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. p. 115-26.
[DPR] California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Sampling for pesticide residues in California well water, 1996 update. 1996. Well Inventory Database. EH 96-06. Sacramento, CA.
Drinkwater LE, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature. 1998. 396:262-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/24376
Dubrovsky NM, Kratzer CR, Brown LR, et al. Water Quality in the San Joaquin Tulare Basins, California, 1992-95. 1998. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey Circular #1159. 38p.
Fluetsch KM, Sparling DW. Avian nesting success and diversity in conventionally and organically managed apple orchards. Env Tox & Chem. 1994. 13:1651-9. https://doi.org/10.1897/1552-8618(1994)13[1651:ANSADI]2.0.CO;2
Folorunso OA, Rolston DE, Prichard T, Louie DT. Cover crops lower soil surface strength, may improve soil permeability. Cal Ag. 1992. 46(6):26-7.
Gliessman SR, Werner M, Swezey SL, et al. Conversion to organic strawberry management changes ecological processes. Cal Ag. 1996. 50(1):24-31.
Hartman Group. The Food and the Environment: A Consumer's Perspective. 1996. Bellevue, WA: The Hartman Group. 60.
Hendricks LC. Almond growers reduce pesticide use in Merced County field trials. Cal Ag. 1995. 49(1):5-10.
Hunt JW, Anderson BS, Phillips BM, et al. Patterns of aquatic toxicity in an agriculturally dominated coastal watershed in California. Ag Econ & Envir. 1999. 75:75-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00065-1
Ingels CA, Bugg RL, McGourty GT, Christensen LP. Cover Cropping in Vineyards: A Grower's Handbook.. 1998. Oakland, CA: UC DANR Publication #3338. 162.
James C. Global Status of Transgenic Crops in 1997. 1997. Accessed Oct 1999. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Application (ISAAA) Brief #5. www.isaaa.org
King A, Geupel GR. Songbird Response to Biological Prune Systems Protocol at Shasta View Farms: Progress Report of the 1997 Field Season to The Nature Conservancy. 1998. 25.
Klienfelder Inc. Elkhorn Slough 205(i) Uplands Water Quality Management Plan. Prepared for Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments 1993. 49.
Klonsky K. A Picture of California's Organic Agriculture. UC Davis Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2000. 2.
Lipson M. Searching for the O-word: Analyzing the USDA Current Research Information System for Pertinence to Organic Farming. Organic Farming Research Foundation 1997. Santa Cruz, CA.: 83.
Medvitz AG, Sokolow AD. Population growth threatens agriculture, open space. Cal Ag. 1995. 49(6):11-7.
Montgomery Watson Consultants. Basin Management Plan. Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency 1993. 165.
Morse , et al. A Survey of Dairy Manure Management Practices in California. J Dairy Science. 1997. 80:1841-5.
[NOSB] National Organic Standards Board. Definition of organic. Drafted and passed at April 1995 meeting in Orlando, FL. 1995. Accessed Oct 1999 www.ota.com/
[NRC] National Research Council. Ecologically Based Pest Management: New Solutions for a New Century.. 1996. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. 1993. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 493p.
Prichard TL, Sills WM, Asai WK, et al. Orchard water use and soil characteristics. Cal Ag. 1989. 43(4):23-5.
Reaganold J, Elliot P, Unger YL. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature. 1987. 330:370-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/330370a0
Santer L. BIOS for Almonds: A Practical Guide to Biologically Integrated Orchard Systems Management.. Davis/Modesto, CA: Community Alliance with Family Farmers Foundation and Almond Board of Calif 1995. p.104.
Shennan C, Drinkwater LE, Van Bru, ggen AHC, Rice B, Madden JP. Comparative study of organic and conventional tomato production systems: An approach to on-farm systems studies. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field.. 1991. Washington DC: NRC, National Academy Press. p. 109-32.
Siegrist S, Schuab D, Pfiffner L, et al. Does organic agriculture reduce soil erodibility? The results of a long-term field study on loess in Switzerland. Ag Econ & Envir. 1998. 69:253-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00113-3
Stern VM, Smith RF, van den, Bosch R, Hagen KS. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia. 1959. 29:81-101.
Swezey SL, Goldman P, Jergens R, Vargas R. Preliminary studies show yield and quality potential of organic cotton. Cal Ag. 1999. 53(3):9-16.
Swezey SL, Werner M, Buchanan M, et al. Granny Smith conversions to organic show preliminary success. Cal Ag. 1994. 48(6):36-44.
[SWRCB] State Water Resources Control Board. California 305(b) Report on Water Quality. 1999. Sacramento, CA: 242.
Temple SR, Somasco OA, Kirk M, Friedman D. Conventional, low-input and organic farming systems compared. Cal Ag. 1994. 48(5):14-9.
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture. U.S. Organic Agriculture. Economic Research Service Issues Center. 2000. Washington, DC.: www.econ.ag.gov/whatsnew/issues/organic/
USDA. Organic vegetable growers surveyed in 1994. Economic Research Service, Natural Resources and Environment Division 1996. Washington, DC:
Also in this issue:On-farm management of agricultural drainage water: An economic analysis
New technologies are changing the face of agriculture
The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato
Q&A: Developing nations key to solving global food, resource problems
Sidebar: News from the UC plant genomics frontier
Organics profit from premiums
Scientists study farm over century
Controversy over agricultural biotechnology continues
Structural adjustment, resources, global economy to challenge California agriculture
Perspective: Is this California agriculture's last century?
Transgenes are revolutionizing crop production
Perspective: How natural is modern agriculture?
Genetic engineering to improve quality, productivity and value of crops
Genetic engineering and cloning may improve milk, livestock production
Advanced information systems to improve livestock management
Precision agriculture can increase profits and limit environmental impacts
Commercialization of university research brings benefits, raises issues and concerns