Methods for the isolation of Brucella abortus
AuthorsB. S. Henry
C. M. Haring
Authors AffiliationsB. S. Henry was Associate in Veterinary Science; resigned; J. Traum was Professor of Veterinary Science and Veterinarian in the Experiment Station; C. M. Haring was Professor of Veterinary Science and Veterinarian in the Experiment Station.
Hilgardia 6(12):355-379. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v06n12p355. January 1932.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
Owing to the greatly increased interest in Brucella abortus since it has been definitely established as a human pathogen and since its economic importance has been more widely recognized, the attempted isolation of the organism from suspected materials has become a routine practice in a large number of laboratories not previously interested in the Brucella group.
The procedures given below, together with some experimental data, are based on several years’ work of this and other laboratories interested in bovine-abortion control. For the most part the methods are those in general use or modifications of such. These methods have uniformly given satisfactory results in research and also in routine diagnosis such as certified-milk inspection and control work in other dairy herds. Because of these results, which have been obtained from the inoculation of several thousand guinea pigs, it was thought that a detailed description of the technique might be of value, in whole or in part, to other workers.
In addition to outlining the methods used, an attempt has been made to compare and evaluate the various procedures.
Direct Culture Method
Although the isolation of Brucella abortus by guinea-pig inoculation, especially from milk, has been the most widely accepted method for many years, from time to time the use of culture media for the direct isolation of the organism from suspected material has been advocated. The most recent work on this method is that of Huddleson, Hasley, and Torrey.(13) For the isolation of Br. abortus from milk, these workers use liver-infusion agar to which is added a saturated aqueous solution of gentian violet in the proportion of 1 part to 10,000 parts of culture medium. The medium is allowed to harden in petri dishes, and 0.1 cc of cream is spread over the surface of the plate. The dye inhibits the growth of most of the other bacteria in the milk, but allows Br. abortus to develop. The advantages of this method of isolation are numerous.
 Amoss Harold L., Poston Mary A. Undulant (Malta) fever. Isolation of the Brucella organism from the stools. Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc. 1929. 93:170-171.
 Amoss Harold L., Poston Mary A. Cultivation of Brucella from the stools and bile. Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc. 1930. 95:472-483. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1930.02720070010005 [CrossRef]
 Barger E. H., Hayes F. M. The discharge of Bacterium abortum in the feces of calves fed milk containing the organism. Jour. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. N. S. 1924. 19:328-336.
 Boez L., Robin L. A. Sur la destruction du pouvoir bactericide du sang. Application a l’hemoculture. Comptes Rendus de la Soc. Biol. (Paris). 1929. 101:1009-1012.
 Carpenter C. M. The bacteriology of the female reproductive organs of cattle and its relation to the diseases of calves. New York State Vet. Coll., Cornell Univ. Ann. Rept. 1921. 1920-21:67-107.
 Carpenter C. M., Boak Ruth. Brucella abortus in milk and dairy products. Amer. Jour. Pub. Health. 1928. 18:743-751. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.18.6.743 [CrossRef]
 Evans Alice C. Bacterium abortus and related bacteria in cows’ milk. Jour. Infect. Diseases. 1918. 23: p. 354-372. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/23.4.354 [CrossRef]
 Fabyan M. A contribution to the pathogenesis of B. abortus Bang II. Jour. Med. Research. 1912. 26: p. 441-488.
 Fleming Alexander. On some simply prepared culture media for B. influenza with a note regarding the agglutination reactions of sera from patients suffering from influenza to this bacillus. Lancet. 1919. 196:138-139. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)25260-X [CrossRef]
 Gilbert Ruth, Coleman M. B., Groesbeck W. M. A study of methods for the isolation of Bacterium abortus. Undulant Fever Symposium. 1929. New York, N. Y.: Amer. Pub. Health Assoc. p. 25-28.
 Hagan William A. Studies on the disease of guinea pigs due to Bacillus abortus. Jour. Exp. Med. 1922. 36: p. 697-709. DOI: 10.1084/jem.36.6.697 [CrossRef]
 Hagan William A. The value of heat killed cultures for the prevention of the Bacillus abortus inoculation disease of guinea pigs. Jour. Exp. Med. 1922. 36:711-725. DOI: 10.1084/jem.36.6.711 [CrossRef]
 Huddleston I. Forrest, Hasley D. E., Torrey J. P. Further studies on the isolation and cultivation of Bacterium abortus (Bang). Jour. Infect. Diseases. 1927. 40: p. 352-368. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/40.2.352 [CrossRef]
 Jaffe R. Hermann. Über die experimentelle Infektion des Meerschweinchens mit dem Bac. melitensis (Bruce) und dem Bac. abortus (Bang). Arch. Path. Anat. u. Physiol. (Virchow). 1922. 238: p. 119-134. DOI: 10.1007/BF01944336 [CrossRef]
 Nelson J. B. A rapid method for the isolation of Bacillus abortus from uterine exudate and diseased placenta. Jour. Exp. Med. 1926. 43:331-338. DOI: 10.1084/jem.43.3.331 [CrossRef]
 Schroeder E. C., Cotton W. E. The bacillus of infectious abortion found in milk. 1911. p. 139-146. 28th Ann. Rpt. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. of Anim. Ind.
 Seddon H. R. Some observations on the methods of using the agglutination test in the diagnosis of the disease in bovines caused by the bacillus of contagious abortion. Jour. Compar. Path. and Ther. 1915. 28:20-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0368-1742(15)80002-2 [CrossRef]
 Smith T., Fabyan M. Über die pathogene Wirkung des Bacillus abortus Bang. Centrbl. Bakt. (etc.) Abt. I, Orig. 1912. 61: p. 549-555.
 Soule M. H. Bacteriological and serological findings in Brucella abortus infections in animals and man. Premier Congres International de Microb. 1930. 1:606-607.
 Surface Frank M. Bovine infectious abortion, epizootic among guinea pigs. Jour. Infect. Diseases. 1912. 11:464-467. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/11.3.464 [CrossRef]
 Traum J., Henry B. S. Boric acid for the preservation of milk naturally infected with Brucella abortus. Jour. Infect. Diseases. 1930. 47: p. 380-383. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/47.5.380 [CrossRef]