Variability of shell porosity in the hen’s egg
AuthorsH. J. Almquist
W. F. Holst
Authors AffiliationsH. J. Almquist was Research Assistant in Poultry Husbandry; W. F. Holst was Assistant Professor of Poultry Husbandry, and Associate Poultry Husbandman in the Experiment Station.
Hilgardia 6(3):61-72. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v06n03p061. August 1931.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
In connection with the formation of the egg in the domestic hen, (Surface (1912)) state that the uterus, which is the shell-forming part of the oviduct, possesses at least two kinds of glands, the function of which is to furnish shell-forming material. From one kind calcerous matter is secreted, from the other mucus. The result is a shell which, according to (Lillie (1919)), consists of three layers, the mammillary layer, the intermediate spongy layer, and the surface cuticle. This heterogeneous envelope is permeable to gases. Lillie explains this characteristic on the basis of a supposed ‘network’ of pores in the spongy layer, connecting the conical inner ends of the mammillae with pores of the cuticle. This conception of shell porosity no doubt originated with (Landois (1865)).
The application of the term ‘spongy’ to the intermediate layer of the egg shell was due to an entirely faulty and misleading experimental procedure. Egg shells were treated with dilute mineral acids. As a matter of course small bubbles of gas, carbon dioxide, appeared scattered all over the exposed shell surface. These bubbles, however, were wrongly interpreted to indicate cavities in the shell and were further assumed to be interconnected by a network of fine channels. Thus, unfortunately, the name ‘spongy layer’ was introduced into ornithological terminology. (Clevisch (1913)), in the course of his much more thorough studies of the subject, found the intermediate layer to represent calcium carbonate crystals, densely knitted together by what appeared to be albuminous material.
Clevisch A. Beiträge zur Struktur und Physiologie der Vogeleischalen. Aus dem zoologischen Institut der Universität Bonn. 1913. Germany: Hannover. 48p.
Dunn L. C. The variation of eggs in the rate at which they lose weight. Poultry Science. 1923. 2(6):199-204. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0020199 [CrossRef]
Landois A. Die Eierschalen der Vogel in histologischer Beziehung. Zeit. f. Wissen. Zool. 1865. 15:1-31.
Lillie F. R. The development of the chick. 2d ed. 1919. New York: Henry Holt and Co. 463p.
Rizzo A. Sul numero e sulla distributione dei pori nel guscio dell’ovo di gallina. Ricerchie del Anat. Lab. Roma. 1899. 7:171-199.
Surface F. M. Histology of the oviduct of the hen. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1912. 206:395-430.
Swenson T. L., Mottern H. H. The oil absorption of shell eggs. Science. 1930. 72(1856):98 DOI: 10.1126/science.72.1856.98 [CrossRef]
Weston W. A. R. D., Halnan E. T. “Black spot” of eggs. Poultry Science. 1927. 6(16):251-258. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0060251 [CrossRef]