Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

Secondary sex characters in Asparagus officinalis L.

Authors

W. W. Robbins
H. A. Jones

Publication Information

Hilgardia 1(9):183-202. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v01n09p183. November 1925.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Abstract does not appear. First page follows.

Introduction

Common asparagus is normally dioecious. Casual observations in the field reveal no striking differences between the two sexes in their vegetative characters. Careful studies, however, show that there are significant quantitative differences between staminate and pistillate individuals.

Secondary sex characters in plants are far less striking than they are in animals. It is probably for this reason that they have received so little attention.

Cowles(1) calls attention to the fact that “immediately after flowering it often is possible to distinguish at some distance pistillate from staminate mulberry trees by their much smaller leaves, as though the constructive material in the former were utilized chiefly in fruit development, and in the latter, in leaf development.” Later in the season, the leaves are equally large on both pistillate and staminate individuals.

Guinier(3) states that dioecism in the case of Pinus montana and P. sylvestris is accompanied by a certain vegetative dimorphism. In purely staminate individuals, the branches terminating in inflorescences have the cones distributed over the greater part of the new shoots, a relatively small area being left at the apex for the short, leaf-bearing twigs. After these male cones have fallen, there is left a long bare section at the base of each new shoot, the leaves forming a tuft at the tip of the shoot.

Literature Cited

[1] Coulter J. M., Barnes C. R., Cowles H. C. A Textbook of Botany. 1911. 2:485-964.

[2] Green W. J. Asparagus. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 9, 2nd Ser. 1890. 3:241-244.

[3] Guinier P. Variation in sexuality, dioecism and sexual dimorphism of Pinus montana and P. sylvestris. Comp. Rend. Seances Soc. Biol. 1921. 84:94-96.

[4] McPhee Hugh C. The influence of environment on sex in hemp, Cannabis sativa L. Jour. Agr. Res. 1924. 28:1067-1080.

[5] Norton J. B. Methods used in breeding asparagus for rust resistance. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bureau Plant Industry, Bul. 1913. 263:1-60.

[6] Rosa J. T. Sex expression in asparagus. Hilgardia. 1925. 1(no. 12): (In press.) DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v01n12p259 [CrossRef]

[7] Tompson H. F. Asparagus notes. Market Growers Jour. 1923. 32:92

[8] Tiedjens Victor A. Some physiological aspects of Asparagus officinalis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1924. 21:129-140.

[9] Yampolsky Cecil. The occurrence and inheritance of sex intergradations in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1920. 7:21-38. DOI: 10.2307/2435083 [CrossRef]

Robbins W, Jones H. 1925. Secondary sex characters in Asparagus officinalis L.. Hilgardia 1(9):183-202. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v01n09p183
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu