Secondary sex characters in Asparagus officinalis L.
AuthorsW. W. Robbins
H. A. Jones
Hilgardia 1(9):183-202. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v01n09p183. November 1925.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
Common asparagus is normally dioecious. Casual observations in the field reveal no striking differences between the two sexes in their vegetative characters. Careful studies, however, show that there are significant quantitative differences between staminate and pistillate individuals.
Secondary sex characters in plants are far less striking than they are in animals. It is probably for this reason that they have received so little attention.
Cowles(1) calls attention to the fact that “immediately after flowering it often is possible to distinguish at some distance pistillate from staminate mulberry trees by their much smaller leaves, as though the constructive material in the former were utilized chiefly in fruit development, and in the latter, in leaf development.” Later in the season, the leaves are equally large on both pistillate and staminate individuals.
Guinier(3) states that dioecism in the case of Pinus montana and P. sylvestris is accompanied by a certain vegetative dimorphism. In purely staminate individuals, the branches terminating in inflorescences have the cones distributed over the greater part of the new shoots, a relatively small area being left at the apex for the short, leaf-bearing twigs. After these male cones have fallen, there is left a long bare section at the base of each new shoot, the leaves forming a tuft at the tip of the shoot.
 Coulter J. M., Barnes C. R., Cowles H. C. A Textbook of Botany. 1911. 2:485-964.
 Green W. J. Asparagus. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 9, 2nd Ser. 1890. 3:241-244.
 Guinier P. Variation in sexuality, dioecism and sexual dimorphism of Pinus montana and P. sylvestris. Comp. Rend. Seances Soc. Biol. 1921. 84:94-96.
 McPhee Hugh C. The influence of environment on sex in hemp, Cannabis sativa L. Jour. Agr. Res. 1924. 28:1067-1080.
 Norton J. B. Methods used in breeding asparagus for rust resistance. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bureau Plant Industry, Bul. 1913. 263:1-60.
 Rosa J. T. Sex expression in asparagus. Hilgardia. 1925. 1(no. 12): (In press.) DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v01n12p259 [CrossRef]
 Tompson H. F. Asparagus notes. Market Growers Jour. 1923. 32:92
 Tiedjens Victor A. Some physiological aspects of Asparagus officinalis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1924. 21:129-140.
 Yampolsky Cecil. The occurrence and inheritance of sex intergradations in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1920. 7:21-38. DOI: 10.2307/2435083 [CrossRef]
Also in this issue:Storage, shipping and precooling of stone fruits
Costs of methods of mechanized harvesting of alfalfa hay are subjects of comparative study
Comparative tests on plowed and unplowed soil for sugar beet seed-bed preparation
Fertilized legumes aid following crop of non-legumes
Control of vapors in storage essential for prolonging life of avocados and citrus fruits
Satisfactory control of wild morning-glory by use of 2,4-D requires proper application
Underground water supply during low rainfall seasons
Poultry nutrition research proves helpful to humans
Vertical cabinet type electric sterilizer tested for lethal effect on bacteria in milk cans
Differences in fertilization needs of citrus in Florida and in California explained
Abstracts of new publications