Pest management record-keeping duties shift with computerization
AuthorsMary Louise Flint
Frank G. Zalom
Authors AffiliationsM.L. Flint is Extension Entomologist, Department of Entomology, and Director of IPM Education & Publications, UC Statewide IPM Project, UC Davis; E. Cullen is Research Assistant, Department of Entomology, UC Davis; E. Zilbert is Research Agronomist, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, UC Davis; F.G. Zalom is Extension Entomologist, Department of Entomology, UC Davis, and Director, UC Statewide IPM Project; G. Miyao is Farm Advisor, UC Cooperative Extension, Yolo County; R. Coviello is Farm Advisor, UC Cooperative Extension, Fresno County. This project was sponsored by the California Tomato Research Institute with funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We wish to acknowledge the assistance of our advisory committee, which included, in addition to the two junior authors, Chuck Rivara, Tomato Research Institute/Processed Tomato Foundation; Kimberly Crum, California Agricultural Production Consultant's Association; Robert Curtis, Campbell's Soup/Processed Tomato Foundation; Robert Mullen, UC Cooperative Extension, San Joaquin County; and the assistance of the California Tomato Growers' Association and the California Agricultural Production Consultants Association for help in obtaining mailing lists.
Hilgardia 52(4):27-31. DOI:10.3733/ca.v052n04p27. July 1998.
Computer software has been widely adopted in the tomato processing industry for maintaining pest management records. Although computers have not reduced the time necessary to complete record-keeping requirements, they have shifted some of the burden from growers to pest control advisers (PCAs). Most records kept are pesticide use records required by law or by processors, and the legally required written recommendation. There is little evidence that computer software is being used to maintain or analyze field scouting data.
Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.. 1978. New York: John Wiley.
Krueger RA. Focus Groups.. 1994. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Toscano N, et al. UC IPM pest management guidelines for tomatoes. 1995. Oakland, CA: University of California DANR Publication 3339. ( http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu ).
UC Statewide IPM Project. Integrated Pest Management for Tomatoes.. 1990. 3rd ed. Oakland, CA.: University of California DANR Publication 3274.
Also in this issue:Ecology of a blackberry-leafhopper-parasite system and its relevance to California grape agroecosystems
Potpourri: New strategies, funding, partnerships
Scientists score dustbusting efforts in Antelope Valley
Summer boating main source of lake's MTBE
DustBusters reduce pollution, wind erosion: Though difficult to achieve, revegetation is best way to stabilize soil
Wind barriers offer short-term solution to fugitive dust
Grape growers report losses to black-foot and grapevine decline
Verticillium survives heat in Mojave Desert alfalfa
Latinos improve food habits through nutrition education
Celery petiole lesion damage caused by insecticide